Will Russia Wake Up?
Will
Russia Wake Up?
Paul
Craig Roberts
Russians
are having a difficult time comprehending their Western enemy or even
understanding that Russia has an enemy that seeks the destruction of Russia.
Has
it occurred to Russia that it is very strange that the UK, a country of no
military significance, a country that could be completely destroyed forever in
a few minutes by Russia, would concoct false charges against the Russian
government, announce these charges publicly without providing any evidence
whatsoever, bring the unsupported charges to the UN, issue an ultimatum to
Russia, dispel Russian diplomats and seize Russian assets on the basis of mere
allegations, all the while refusing any evidence and any cooperation with
Russia, as required by law, in the investigation of the charges?
Russians,
both government, media and youth brainwashed by American propaganda and the
Washington-funded NGOS that the Russian government permits to operate against
itself in Russia, seem to think that the many accusations and threats issued
against Russia are some kind of mistake that can be rectified by recourse to
evidence and law. Apparently, after all these years the Russians still do not understand
that Washington and its vassals have no interest whatsoever in facts or law.
At
the UN the Russian ambassador, in response to the evidence-free accusation by
the UK prime minister that the Russian government had used a military-grade
nerve agent to attempt to kill two people on an English park bench, went
through all the legal reasons, including the requirement of collaboration with
Russia in examining the evidence, to establish that the UK accusation was in
violation of law and unsupported by any evidence.
Why
do the Russians think the British government cares a hoot about law or
evidence? Are the Russians really this brainwashed about the West?
The
British government of Tony Blair cooperated with the George W. Bush regime in
propagating the lie that Saddam Hussein in Iraq had “weapons of mass
destruction.” This lie was used to invade and to destroy Iraq and to leave the
country 15 years later in chaos.
The
British government also supported the lies about Gadaffi in Libya and
participated in overthrowing the Libyan government. The British government also
supported the lie that Iran had a nuclear weapons program. There was never any
evidence, but evidence was of no interest. An agenda was in motion, and the
agenda was independent of evidence.
Although
the British Parliament voted down British participation in Obama’s planned
invasion of Syria, the current British government supports the lie that Assad
is using chemical weapons “against his own people.”
By
now one would think that Russians, both government, media, and public, would
understand that all the West is capable of is to lie. The purpose of the lies
is to demonize Russia and to set up Russia for military attack.
But
somehow Russians can’t get the message. Russians think it is all some kind of
mistake that facts and legal processes and diplomacy can clear up. “Please just
listen to us, we can clear up all the misconceptions!” As if the West cares.
Washington wants “the misconceptions.” That is why Washington creates them.
The
inability of Russians to understand the West, which Russia stupidly wants to
join, is the reason that World War 3 is near at hand.
What
if, instead of reciting the legal process and the law governing it that the UK
PM refused to follow before publicly accusing Russia without the presentation
of any evidence, The Russian UN Ambassador had simply said: “If the UK exists
tomorrow, it will be due entirely to the forbearance of the Russian government.”
By
relying on law, about which no Western country gives a hoot, the Russian UN
ambassador permitted Washington’s French puppet and other of Washington’s
European puppet states to say that they supported the British charges against
Russia despite the absence of evidence. Perhaps the Russians noticed that none
of those European governments required any evidence that Russia was
responsible. All that was required was the accusation.
In
the exceptional, indispensable Western World ruled by Washington, accusation
alone is proof of Russian mendacity. When British Labour Party leader Jeremy
Corbyn asked PM May if she actually had any real evidence that Russia had tried
to kill the former British double-agent, Corbyn was shouted down not only by
the corrupt Conservatives but also by members of the Labour Party that he
heads. How much more evidence does Russia need that facts are not important to
the West?
Will
Russia wake up? Or will its demented desire to be part of the West leave
Russians unprepared for Washington’s nuclear strike, which is coming.
What
if the Russian government simply told Washington: “If you or your terrorist
mercenaries attack Syrian forces, we will eliminate your presence in the Middle
East and Israel as well.” This is something that Russia can do at the drop of a
hat.
What
would the British and Washington do, other than wet their pants? Clearly, they
would get the message and decide that peace is a better idea.
The
Russian government simply does not understand that Washington regards Russian appeals
to diplomacy, law, facts, evidence, as signs of extreme weakness and lack of
confidence. Washington and its puppet states do not need any facts. They
have an agenda. By calling for facts, the Russians show their weakness.
The
Russian display of weakness encourages Washington’s aggression. Does Russia’s
desire to be a part of the West exceed its desire for national survival?
No comments:
Post a Comment