President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Mr Prime Minister, ladies
and gentlemen, friends, colleagues,
I would like to note right away that the visit
of Prime Minister of Italy Matteo Renzi turned out to be very
dynamic and intensive. First, we had a detailed, constructive
conversation on key issues of bilateral cooperation
at a meeting in narrow format, and then we held
an expanded-format meeting with the participation of Government
members and a broad cross-section of the business community.
We discussed practically the entire range of bilateral issues
with Mr Renzi. Our meetings on the sidelines of major economic
events are becoming a good tradition. A year ago,
on June 10, we opened the Day of Russia
at the World Universal Exhibition EXPO-2015 in Milan. This year
we are receiving Italy as the main guest of the St
Petersburg International Economic Forum. Mr Renzi’s personal participation
in this event ensured that the Italian business community was well
represented. In all, over $1.3 billion Euros worth of contracts have
been signed with Italian businesses on the sidelines
of the forum. The latest one – I understand it’s
the largest – is worth about one billion dollars.
Italy is fifth among Russia’s foreign trade partners.
At the same time mutual trade decreased in 2015. Regrettably,
the recession continued into the beginning of this year.
Understandably, the ups and downs of the economic situation
and different political restrictions have played a role in this.
During the talks we paid special attention to developing
specific steps to bolster trade and economic cooperation. We
understand how difficult this task is but will consistently work
to resolve it.
We see that our Italian friends are also ready to normalise
business relations. The talks showcased a common desire
to revive the work of the main mechanisms of practical
bilateral cooperation. Energy remains the strategic area
of Russian-Italian cooperation.
Italy is one of the largest consumers of Russian natural
gas. Despite lower price value last year, deliveries grew 12 percent
in physical volumes. Russian and Italian companies continue
to work together on large-scale joint projects. You have seen
the contracts that, on our side, were signed by Rosneft
and NOVATEK. The agreements centre on geological exploration,
oil extraction and refining, condensed gas production
and transportation. Production in Russia of cutting-edge
equipment for the energy industry is also in the deals.
We see on the whole great opportunities for Italian
companies to base production in Russia. The talks with our
Italian partners showed us that they are interested in that, too.
Expanding interregional ties and promoting cooperation
in such high-tech industries as the aircraft engineering
and space could have a positive effect.
You were present during the signing of the relevant
documents, but the road towards them did not start today. Finmeccanica,
for instance, has been on our market for a long time
and has achieved a good reputation. We talked with them today about
ways to deepen our cooperation and make it more stable.
Russia and Italy are working together to explore near-Earth
space. An Italian astronaut is currently in training
for an ISS mission in 2017.
Italian companies readily engage in large-scale infrastructure
projects in Russia. For example, here in St Petersburg, Italian
companies are building the Western High-Speed Diameter, while they also
are engaged in the Moscow-St Petersburg motorway,
and the M5 Ural federal motorway projects
in the Chelyabinsk Region.
Russian-Italian dialogue also continues in the humanitarian
sphere. Mr Prime Minister emphasised this during our talks today. Our countries
are making a great contribution to the preservation
of world cultural heritage. We have agreed that our experts should
coordinate their efforts on the preservation and restoration
of historical monuments in Palmyra. When talking about international
issues, we paid special attention to the threat of terrorism.
Both Russia and Italy share a view that an adequate response
to this global challenge can only be found through a common effort of the international
community. Of course, we discussed the settlement of crises
in Ukraine, Syria and other areas, where there is no peace yet.
I would mention one more fact. Traditionally
and historically, Italy is deeply involved in North Africa, and,
particularly Libya. We discussed this as well with Prime Minister Renzi
today.
In conclusion, I want to thank our partners
for an interested and constructive conversation and express
my hope that all the projects that we mentioned today will be
implemented.
Thank you.
Prime Minister of Italy Matteo Renzi (retranslated): President Putin,
my heartfelt thank you for the invitation. It has been
a pleasure and honour for us, for Italy, to visit
the forum, to be among the guests of the St Petersburg
International Economic Forum.
I would like to once again express my appreciation
to the organisers and to the city,
and to stress the high level and quality
of the discussion. This is a new contribution to our
bilateral relations.
As to us, this is our fifth bilateral meeting; we met
previously in Milan and in Turkey on the sidelines
of the G20 summit. Even the sixth meeting, I forgot about
Australia. And at all of our meetings we tried to work
together on all the dossiers, as we did today.
I am grateful to President Putin for his sensitivity
regarding North Africa issues, which are priority issues for us. We have
discussed the challenges of international magnitude, including
publicly, I stress, and including those we disagree on,
on the issues of European and international politics
and geopolitics. But whatever the case, we had a chance
to discuss everything quite frankly, in depth, and I hope,
very fruitfully.
Regarding our bilateral relations, we have emphasised, on our
side, the points highlighted by Mr Putin in his speech:
the extraordinary significance of our energy partnership
and everything arising out of it for all our companies,
and not just a few companies; opportunities opening up
in agriculture. We would like to put a stake on the Made
with Italy model in agricultural sector to uncover its potential
because both Russia and Italy can make mutually beneficial steps forward.
This also undoubtedly includes everything concerning scientific research,
as Mr Putin reminded us, and overall issues my colleague has
mentioned.
Our position is that it is building bridges rather than walls that has
strategic importance. I am saying this because Italian journalists have
participated today and have seen how the Astaldi company works. It
has nearly completed, in strict observance of the schedule,
the construction of a 14-kilometre long bridge here, in St
Petersburg. I believe Mr Putin will open the bridge
in a few weeks’ time. I also believe that this is not so much
a matter of infrastructure as a symbolic act. Today, we
need to resume building bridges.
And one more small detail in conclusion. It does not happen
every day that you learn from President Vladimir Putin that Team Italy scored
a goal on the 88th minute, as it happened
to me today. I hope this will bring us good luck. Let me remind you
that the next match is on Tuesday, and I will be waiting
for very good news from you.
All right, jokes aside, let us hope that it will bring good luck,
including good luck to Russia in holding the 2018 FIFA World
Cup.
Question (re-translated): A question forboth leaders, if
I may.
While recognising Russia’s fundamental role in the search
for acceptable solutions on all the international dossiers, from
the Iran dossier to the military intervention in Syria, is
it possible to suggest that Russia will also get involved in looking
for a general solution of the Libya issue?
Prime Minister of Italy Matteo Renzi: We have been
talking about it for a long time, and Russia is already working
together with the international community. Russia is not only a large
international power, it is also one of the countries that have
a permanent membership in the UN Security Council. That is why
everything, Libya included, passes via President Putin’s and Minister
Lavrov’s desk, and Mr Lavrov has an excellent relationship with
Italy’s Foreign Minister Paolo Gentiloni.
I believe that at the moment efforts are aimed
at minimising tensions in Libya, trying to arrive
at a government that would be capable of running
the country and influencing the reality so
as to finally bring peace to that nation after many years since
the interference began. It was probably not the best type
of interference, let’s be straight about it, it was a mistake
to organise military involvement in such a way. We hope that
the nation will finally see peace. We were looking for Russia’s
involvement, and Russia never spared efforts for us.
Vladimir Putin: I share Mr Prime Minister’s opinion
on the fallacy of the actions in Libya
and in some other countries of the region. I also
agree with him that in this case we should not so much look back but rather
look forward in search of a solution. The situation is very
complicated: the government, the parliament, armed groups,
the tribal concerns, economic, ethnic and other issues – it is
fairly difficult to narrow all that down to a common
denominator.
In the course of our conversation I assured Mr
Prime Minister that Russia will be working in a very constructive way
with the international community in the interests
of the Libyan people, of course, and not with the aim
of causing any kind of dissonance in the joint work but
to look for a solution acceptable for all the parties.
Question: At the opening ceremony, former President
of France Nicolas Sarkozy, speaking about the sanctions, said that,
in his opinion, Russia should make the first move and abolish
the counter-sanctions, which in fact were introduced in retaliation
to European sanctions. His reasoning is that the stronger opponent is
always first to extend his hand – and the stronger one is
Russia and you personally, he said – and Europe will
reciprocate. How would you comment on this proposal? Do you see this
compliment about you being stronger a disguised dare for you
to act?
Vladimir Putin: There are many ways to characterise people
and countries. Some may be strong, others less strong; some are smart,
and others not so smart. Some are clever. Mr Sarkozy is certainly very
friendly to our country, and we can be sure that he supports
a rapprochement between Russia and the EU.
We had a lengthy discussion on the subject
at the meeting the day before yesterday, and I think
there is a constructive aspect to his proposal, something we should
listen to. We would be willing to take this step if we were more confident
that they would not pull a fast one on us, to use a popular
term, as has happened before. We need to be sure that any unilateral
moves by Russia will be followed by reciprocal steps, real steps,
not, as a well-known classic said, “one step forward, two steps
back.”
It is hard to say at this stage who could even convince us
that our partners are geared to such work. I would say that here
and now, we are not the ones who need to be convinced, but
rather it is necessary to convince our partners in Kiev
to perform the clear obligations they have undertaken by signing
the Minsk Agreements. You know, I do not even want to talk about
this again. These are not some secret agreements; the entire text is
available online. What does it say?
Kiev agreed to amend the Constitution by the end
of 2015. We cannot do it for them.
To adopt the amnesty law. It has been adopted, but never
signed. I am not the President of Ukraine, so I cannot sign
the law for him.
To implement the special status law. The legislation was
adopted, but never put into effect; instead it was postponed
in a clever way: by adopting another amendment, Article 10
or something, which delayed its enforcement.
Well, they could manoeuvre endlessly, but they cannot expect us
to do something we cannot do.
I understand that it is not easy to make such decisions
in Ukraine now, that they require a lot of political courage
and support of the public and key political forces. But if
they signed the agreement, it means they made a commitment.
As for our European partners, knowing all this, they should
not shift all responsibility for the current developments onto us,
especially for things that are beyond our control. Why don’t they work
with their allies in Kiev instead, if they really mean well
for the Ukrainian people.
They need help to get out of this never-ending spiral.
The conflicting parties must finally establish a direct dialogue,
direct contact and direct negotiations. And if we see at some
point that everything is, in fact, being done, we will be willing
to take the first step – to amend various restrictions
on trade and the economy.
Question (re-translated): Italy was a country that treated
the sanctions with a lot of reflection, for example, it
insisted on a non-automatic extension of the sanctions.
In the past few days a proposal emerged worded by Italian
entrepreneurs, among others, on extending the sanctions
for three rather than six months which means the next date
for the decision on extending sanctions will be closer. What do
you think about this proposal? Do you think you could get it across to our
partners?
Mr President, good evening. I would also like to ask you
a question about Russia’s good relations with a set of political
parties and movements of Eurosceptics, who do not support political
integration. They include a movement in Hungary and Marine le
Pen’s National Front in France. The question I want to ask
is whether you prefer to have a dialogue with a strong
integrated Europe with a united voice, or with a weaker
and more diffused Europe, let’s put it this way.
Matteo Renzi: Italy’s position is very simple. The sanctions
are not extended automatically as if it were usual business. Mr Putin has
stated his position a number of times saying that the longer
the sanctions last, the longer it will take to find different
solutions. But the fundamental question is whether there is an active
stance on what is going on, and it is discussed, there are political
debates, or the sanctions turn into a routine, both sanctions
and counter-sanctions, for the reasons President Putin has just
stated. So I can assure you that we shall ask the ambassadors
at their next meeting in Brussels not to automatically extend
the sanctions and to find out what stage the implementation
of the Minsk Agreements has reached.
We shall ask regarding the Minsk Agreements, and they are not
secret, as Mr Putin has said, one can read their text online,
to state who has done what and by which date. In this case
the discussion will be conducted by the foreign ministers. But
the central issue is that all the parties must be urged
to implement the Minsk protocols.
We are doing it with our European partners who are responsible
for the project, we are doing it with our Russian friends
and with Ukrainians as well, we say clearly to them, and Mr
Putin has already said so, that the agreement should be implemented not
just by one party but by all the parties. This is a very
serious stance, and I think it is also very logical. We have been
saying this since day one.
Vladimir Putin: As to your question: it is made up of several
parts, and some of it repeats the widespread European cliché
that Russia supposedly supports certain nationalist parties and has
special relationships with them. As far back as ten years ago,
I told my European friends that the policy they pursued would
lead to inevitable rise in popularity of nationalist movements
and parties, which is precisely what is happening today, amid
the growing inflow of refugees and migrants. But we have nothing
to do with it, so you would have to ask those who are involved
in this work in Europe. This is an extremely sensitive
humanitarian issue, and people fleeing from war do need help. But it is
also clear that, while offering help, a country should primarily think
of its own citizens.
But we are not going to interfere in these matters,
and we maintain contacts with all political forces in Europe: those
in power and those in opposition. This is my answer
to the first part.
The second part seems to be related
to the so-called Brexit. Do you really want me to tell you how Russia
feels about this, or if Russia prefers to deal with a strong
or a weak Europe? Of course, Russia wants to interact with
a strong Europe, because a dialogue with a weak partner is more
trouble than it is worth: they can always be pressured by a third
party, and all agreements and cooperation plans go down
the drain. A strong partner would never allow this.
But what would we call a strong Europe? This problem is waiting
for a painstaking researcher, and I would rather it is you,
not us. Will Europe be stronger if Britain votes to leave
or to stay? Some experts say that Europe will be more focused, others
that it is the first step towards the collapse of the rest
of Europe, and so on and so forth.
I certainly have my own opinion on this matter. We
discussed this with my European colleagues, both yesterday
and the day before. I heard different points of view,
different approaches. I am not going to express my opinion
publicly today. I believe that we must respect the choice
of the British people, whatever that choice is. We just need
to wait a few days and see what happens.
Question: Mr Prime Minister, my congratulations
on the victory, your advancement to the play-offs,
the Italian team has a lot of female fans in Russia.
But I would like to ask a serious question. Italy has
traditionally been Russia’s long-term and reliable partner in energy
projects, in particular, in increasing Russian gas supplies
to Europe. Meanwhile, a number of projects have been frozen:
first the South Stream, then the Turkish Stream.
Is Italy still interested in Russian gas? Can the frozen
projects be revived, or is there a discussion of some new
projects comparable with the South Stream and the Turkish
Stream?
Vladimir Putin: Let me be the first to answer. Yes, our
Italian partners do have an interest in continuing our cooperation,
including cooperation in the infrastructure sphere. We had
a very lively discussion about it today. We spoke about the mistakes
we made in the past, we spoke about what can be done to avoid
them in the future, and about what is of interest
to us in the near and mid-term future.
This is an opportunity to work further
in the southern direction as well. As you know, just
recently Gazprom, Italian and Greek partners signed a memorandum
on searching for such joint projects. We spoke about Nord Stream 2,
and I will be frank, there is nothing classified about it. We spoke
about expanding our interaction to new areas in the energy
sector.
In fact, we think none of the issues have been closed.
We, the Russian side, are ready for this cooperation, yet we are
still waiting for our European partners, including Italian ones, will
adopt the same attitude, so that we can work to implement
the plans on our agenda. There are many plans. You witnessed
the documents being signed today at this desk, very important
documents, for example, on Yamal, or Rosneft’s cooperation with
its partners in the Barents or Black seas. This is also
in one way or another related to infrastructure development.
Gazprom has been and will continue cooperating with ENI. We are generally
satisfied with how the work is progressing. As to some
complexities, say, Europe’s third energy package and the like,
I think we will gradually find solutions and resolve those complicated
issues as well.
Matteo Renzi: In the course of our almost four-hour
talk, we certainly addressed energy issues more than once. Italy's position is
as follows. We have traditional friendly relations with the Russian
authorities. As President Putin said, the agreements signed here
during these hours convey the idea of what we think and do. We
have signed agreements worth more than a billion euros,
and potentially, these agreements will open up opportunities
for partnerships worth another four to five billion. This suggests we
have given attention to this sphere.
I would prefer the South Stream project to continue.
This is not the case. But neither Russia nor Italy is responsible
for that. This is what I think. In the next 20 years, going
back to what I said in my speech, Russia and Italy will
have several areas of cooperation. I could bet that the energy
sector will remain a priority and that, using common sense,
as President Putin said, we will be able to find a solution.
Efforts should be made by the Russian authorities, and certainly
by European governments as well.
In conclusion, I would like to make this point,
and I will try to be very clear, also in the European
context. As you may have noticed today, at the end of his
speech, President Putin sounded more like an Europeanist than I did,
because he said: ‘True, Europe can have problems, and I believe that
Europe has a future if it looks towards that future. I think we have
taken a small step in that direction today.’
Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment