Crack
in German consensus on sanctions as Christine Lindner head of Germany's FDP
says sanctions policy has failed and time has come to face reality by
recognising Crimea as Russian.
Christian
Lindner, the head of the German liberal FDP, has broken a taboo in German
politics by saying that Germany should recognise Crimea as Russia
as a “permanent provisional solution” and lift sanctions on Russia thereafter.
We
have to get out of the dead-end situation. To break a taboo, I fear that
we must see the Crimea as a permanent provisional arrangement, at least for
now.
In
making this call Lindner made the obviously true point that the sanctions are
not working in that they have failed to change Russian policy. The result
is that relations between Germany and Russia and between Russia and Europe are
suffering, as are the commercial ties between them, to no purpose.
The
FDP is one of the important historic parties of Germany. For much of
German history since the end of the Second World War it has held the balance in
the Bundestag between the CDU/CSU on the right and the SPD on the left,
deciding which of these two blocs would form the government with the FDP the
junior coalition partner.
The
result was that the FDP was almost continuously in government in Germany
between 1961 and 1998, and continuously so from 1969 to 1998, sometimes in
coalition with the CDU/CSU, sometimes in coalition with the SDP.
Since
1998 the FDP has however struggled to retain influence as new parties such as
the Greens, the Left Party and more recently the AfD have emerged in Germany.
In the federal elections of 2013 it fell below the 5% share of the vote
needed to secure a place in the Bundestag, though it is expected to win enough
votes to re-enter the Bundestag in the forthcoming federal elections in
November. There have even been some suggestions that after the election
it might resume its old role as a junior partner in yet another coalition led
by Angela Merkel.
Whether
this is what happens or not, the importance of Lindner’s comment is that for
all its recent problems the FDP is very much an establishment party, in fact –
because of its long history in government – arguably the most establishment
party in Germany.
When
the leader of the FDP therefore says that the sanctions policy against Russia
has failed and that Crimea should be recognised as Russian – even if only as
part of some “permanent provisional solution” (whatever that means) – it
necessarily carries more weight than when the same thing is said by politicians
of the AfD and the Left party or retired politicians of the CDU or SPD.
Moreover
there is no doubt Lindner’s opinions are widely shared across the German
political establishment, even though others might be more wary of saying them
publicly. Suffice to say that German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel and
CSU leader and Bavarian Minister-President Horst Seehofer – both frequent
visitors to Moscow – are widely suspected of holding these views.
The
key point however is that Lindner openly expressed these opinions whilst
Germany is going through elections. Though his comments have been roundly
denounced – most vehemently by the now fiercely anti-Russian Green Party –
presumably Lindner would not have said them if he did not think that many
Germans – including much of the German business community – would agree with him.
It
is too early to say that opposition to the sanctions in Germany has reached a
critical mass. The sanctions are hardly a central issue for most Germans
– or even for most of German business – with most German business people
seemingly still loyal to Germany’s conservative Chancellor Angela Merkel.
However
three events have happened this year which may be causing opposition to the
sanctions in Germany to harden.
Firstly
there is the dawning realisation in Germany that Russia – far from being
crushed by the sanctions – is coming strongly out of recession, and is
increasingly forging closer economic links with China as German and European
businesses are becoming frozen out. There must be increasing numbers of
German businessmen who must be wondering whether Germany might be in danger of
missing the bus.
Secondly
there is the real anger in Germany at the latest sanctions law recently passed
by the US Congress and signed by President Trump. Not only does that law
obviously target Germany’s energy links to Russia – overwhelmingly viewed in
Germany as a fundamental economic interest – but many Germans must now realise
that Germany itself in effect opened the door to this law agreeing to impose
sanctions on Russia in the first place. Inevitably that must make more
Germans question the wisdom of Germany persisting with any anti-Russian
sanctions at all.
Lastly
there is the growing sense of distance between Germany and the US. This
goes beyond German hostility to President Trump, but also takes in US pressure
on Germany to increase military spending and such vexing issues as the campaign
the US authorities are waging against the German car industry on the subject of
toxic diesel emissions.
It
remains to be seen whether Lindner and the FDP in the face of the pressure they
are coming under will stick to the positions on Crimea and sanctions that
Lindner has just expressed, and beyond that there is the overriding issue of
what the outcome of the forthcoming German elections will be. However
Lindner’s comments suggest that the direction of the wind is changing.
No comments:
Post a Comment