ERIC ZUESSE |
25.07.2017 | OPINION
The
Current Big Lie Is...
The
Big Lie today is as enormous as, and potentially far more harmful than, any Big
Lie throughout history has been; and, it will be exposed fully here, and will
be documented even more fully, by means of the links that are provided in this
summary of it. (This Big Lie is certainly important enough for that care,
because if the lie is continued unexposed, that massive fraud will produce
World War III, a world-destroying nuclear war, perhaps even soon.) So, this
will be only a summary of it, but a completely documented summary — not a mere
‘exposé’ that’s expected to be believed because it is already generally
suspected or thought to be the case, but, instead, something that's
presented in the expectation that the key facts of the case have, to the
contrary, been so effectively hidden from the public, as to make
necessary here the providing of full documentation of it, for anyone who wants to delve
more deeply into this ongoing rape of history — the super-dangerous Big Lie
that’s ongoing right now.
This
Big Lie today, which is to be described here, is the lie, upon the basis of
which the Cold War against the dictatorial communistic USSR — which Cold War
had been such a boost to US weapons-makers such as Lockheed Martin while it
lasted — actually became restored in 2014, and
continues today, as, this time, not a ‘cold’ but a hot war, by the US and its
allies, all united together (for the benefit of the owners of their
international corporations, and especially of the big US arms-suppliers)
against democratic post-communist Russia (which gets blamed for trying to
defend itself, at every step of the way that it does so). This increasingly hot
war started in early 2014 (after at least three years of advance-preparation of
it by the US Administration of American President Barack Obama), in Ukraine
(formerly a part of the USS.R.), when a CIA coup that was perpetrated under the cover of
‘democracy’ demonstrations, against the democratically elected Ukrainian
President, Viktor Yanukovych — when this CIA coup installed there, in Ukraine,
a rabidly anti-Russian government, bordering Russia. That is certainly a
provocation to war, just as would be the case if instead Russia had overthrown
Mexico’s government and installed there a rabidly anti-US regime.
In
this Big Lie, which reigns today and is almost universally believed in the US
to be true, that bloody coup in Ukraine is simply ignored, and
instead the focus is placed upon the peaceful and voluntary breakaway of Crimea
from Ukraine, which breakaway actually resulted directly from that coup,
which was the real precipitating-event for ’the new Cold War’
— the basis of the US-and-allied economic sanctions against Russia, and for the
massing of NATO troops and weapons onto Russia’s borders, ready to invade
Russia. (How would Americans feel if the Russian government did all of that,
to us?)
The
Big Lie today is this: that the reason for
the economic sanctions against Russia, is that ‘Putin’ or Russia ‘stole’ or
‘conquered’ or ‘seized’ the Crimea region of Ukraine. The Big Truth, about the
matter, is that US President Obama conquered Ukraine itself (all of it), via a
February 2014 CIA coup that he had secretly started planning by no later than 2011, which on
20 February 2014 culminated with the violent
overthrow of the democratically elected President of Ukraine,
Yanukovych, who had won 90% of the votes in the far-eastern Donbass area of
Ukraine, and 75% of the votes in the far-southern Crimea area of Ukraine,
both of which intensely pro-Yanukovych regions refused to be ruled by the
Obama-appointed rulers — the hard-right, fascist and rabidly anti-Russian, team
that the Obama regime imposed upon Ukraine, after Obama’s
agent Victoria Nuland told Obama’s Ambassador to Ukraine on 4 February 2014,
that «Yats» (Arseniy Yatenyuk), a hard-right and even racist anti-Russian Ukrainian politician, was to
become appointed to run the country as soon as the coup would be over, which
happened 23 days later (and Yatsenyuk did then receive the
appointment and establish very hard-right anti-Russian policies —
including massacres of ethnic Russians in Ukraine).
The legalities of the situation are as heinous on America’s
side as the moralities are; and, yet, America’s vassal-states, in the EU
and elsewhere, slavishly honor Obama’s sanctions against the victim-nation
here, Russia (even while acknowledging that the residents of Crimea are overwhelmingly supportive of having separated
themselves from Ukraine and grateful to Russia for now protecting them
against the rabidly anti-Crimean US-imposed rulers of
Ukraine). Furthermore: by no later than 26 February 2014, the leaders of the EU knew
that the ‘revolution on the Maidan’ had, in fact, been a brutal coup, nothing
at all ‘democratic’ — but decided to ignore that fact. So, they too are
culpable in this, though not nearly to the extent that Obama is.
On
Friday 21 July 2017, the anti-Russian Reuters ‘news’
(propaganda) agency headlined «Crimean scandal prompts Siemens to retreat from Russian
energy» and reported that, «Germany's Siemens tried to distance itself
from a Crimean sanctions scandal on Friday, halting deliveries of power
equipment to Russian state-controlled customers and reviewing supply deals. The
industrial group said it now had credible evidence that all four gas turbines
it delivered a year ago for a project in southern Russia had been illegally
moved to Crimea, confirming a series of Reuters reports». The false
underlying assumption in this propaganda-article was that the
«scandal» it refers to had been initiated and perpetrated by Russia, not by
the United States government (which initiated the sanctions against Russia,
which Siemens and Russia are now being punished for). The Wikipedia propaganda
site says in its article «Russian financial crisis (2014–2017)» that «The
financial crisis in Russia in 2014-2015 was the result of the collapse of the
Russian ruble beginning in the second half of 2014» and barely even mentions
the economic sanctions, other than to say, «The second [reason for it] is the
result of international economic sanctions imposed on Russia following Russia's
annexation of Crimea and the Russian military intervention in Ukraine» —
implying, but not stating, that Russia had started that war — which just happened to
be on its doorstep, not on the doorstep of the US — as if
Mexico had been taken over by an enemy nation and the people of America were
being threatened, which is what this takeover by the US government was equivalent
to for the Russian people: a very real and grave national-security
threat to them.
The
Reuters article simply ignored the fact that Ukraine had been seized by Obama,
and it simply presumed that Crimea (and also Donbass) had been
seized by Putin. (Furthermore, the appeal by Donbass to become a part of
Russia, was declined by Putin on 17 September 2014. But, still, the lie
is also being pumped by pro-US-regime ’news’media, that Russia is trying to
steal Donbass from Ukraine’s government. The US team’s lying is beyond bizarre. Sometimes, by their using carefully veiled language to deceive without outright
asserting their lies, they implicitly blame Russia regarding the impasse in
Donbass, even three years after Putin said no to that appeal by the
residents of Donbass. And, still: Russia, which had — despite the Obama
regime’s refusal to participate — signed and even had helped set up the Minsk
agreements to settle the war in Donbass, gets blamed in the US-allied press for
what are actually Ukraine’s refusal to honor the commitments it had signed to
there. As usual, the victims get blamed. And the Trump Administration says that «there should be no
sanctions relief until Russia meets its obligations under the Minsk
agreements». No good deed will go unpunished — ever.)
Nor
has Reuters (nor the rest of the US regime’s press) reported that a power-struggle is now occurring in the post-coup Ukraine,
between the overt nazis (or racist-fascists) there, and the post-coup (rump
remaining Ukrainian-elected) (that’s the fascist but not outright nazi) elected
government (in elections that excluded non-fascists). The fascists, whom the
current US regime supports, are being attacked by the nazis. The nazis
are being led by Dmitriy Yarosh, whose followers are unabashedly nazis and often even boldly flash German Nazi
Party insignia. The US Obama regime was one
of only three governments throughout the world that voted against a resolution
that had been introduced in the United Nations condemning fascism, racism and denial
of the Holocaust. The two other pro-Nazi nations were Ukraine, whose
US-installed regime felt the resolution to be personally offensive even though
it wasn’t specific to Ukraine and didn’t even mention Ukraine, and the other
country was Canada, which is a US vassal-nation and also has a powerful
community of Ukrainian Nazis who escaped Ukraine right after WW II ended in
1945. Canada’s current Foreign Minister, appointed by the Liberal Party’s Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau, is Chrystia Freeland, a racist-fascist who is proud of her Nazi
grandparents and who championed in Canada the fascist takeover of
Ukraine.
When
the International Criminal Court issued, on 14 November 2016, its annual «Report on Preliminary
Examination Activities», it included, on pages 34-43, a section on
«Ukraine,» but considered only accusations that the Obama-installed Ukrainian
government had lodged against Russia, and none of the demonstrated crimes
(which are amply documented in the links herein), including the illegal coup,
that the Obama regime had, in fact, perpetrated against not only the people of
Ukraine, but the people of Russia next door; and the discussion by the ICC did
not (such as an influential but grossly false Forbes article
six days later headlined and yet provided no documentation
for, «International Criminal Court: Russia's Invasion Of Ukraine Is
A 'Crime,' Not A Civil War») even allege that any «crime»
had been committed by any party; but, nonetheless, the Russian government
(which had never ratified the treaty that established the Court) condemned the
report as being «one-sided,» which was an understatement, because the report
included many gross falsehoods, outright lies, such as (and I boldface the
falsehood):
«At
the time of the start of the events that are the subject of the Office’s
preliminary examination, the democratically-elected Government of Ukraine was
dominated by the Party of Regions, led by President at the time, Viktor
Yanukovych. The Maidan protests were prompted by the decision of the
Ukrainian Government on 21 November 2013 not to sign an Association Agreement
with the European Union».
As
I and others have documented, the overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically elected
President started well before that time, and the coup even was already being organized inside the US Embassy there by no
later than 1 March 2013; and the US State Department had begun its work to prepare it, no later than 2011 — it
didn’t simply ‘happen’. And it certainly wasn’t ‘democratic’; it ended whatever
democracy Ukraine had. Furthermore, Yanukovych’s turn-down of the EU’s offer
was, itself, a part of the Obama regime’s plan: Yanukovych had turned it down
because the Ukrainian Academy of Science’s analysis of the EU’s offer (which
had been prepared in accord with the US government’s urgings) had concluded
that to accept the deal would produce losses for Ukraine of $160 billion.
This
is the Big Lie straight out of hell, because, unless the United States
acknowledges publicly that it has been lying, and that the anti-Russia
sanctions that the US initiated, are based on that lie and should therefore
never even have been imposed (and should not be honored anywhere), there will
be war between Russia and the US Either those sanctions will be entirely
lifted, or else nuclear war will inevitably result, because Russia will not
forever tolerate having its economy squeezed to death on the basis of a clear
lie. But how can such sanctions be ended unless the perpetrator — here,
clearly, the US — publicly acknowledges that former US President Barack Obama,
and his Administration, lied through their teeth, in order to impose them, in
the first place? The US government would need to renounce, to the entire world,
that former US President. Or else, WW III would seem to be well-nigh
inevitable. This is an extremely serious matter, which isn’t so much as even
being discussed — much less, debated. WW III could result from it, but it is
entirely ignored. The Big Lie just continues to be promoted, instead of
exposed.
Back
on 20 February 2015, I headlined «Crimea: Was It Seized by Russia, or Did Russia Block Its
Seizure by the US?» and, in the years since, the documentation that it
was Obama not Putin who initiated (perpetrated) the new ‘Cold War’, has only increased. But the ‘news’media
hide this fact (just as they hid that article), because they exist in order to
pump the Big Lie, not to puncture it. (And, of course, that also is why they
won’t publish this, though it, too, is sent to all of them free-of-charge to
publish.)
Donald
Trump condemns many of his predecessor’s actions and decisions and statements;
but, on this one, which is the most important of them all and is blatantly a
fraud (the blame for the entire catastrophe in Ukraine), Trump remains
alternately supportive, and noncommittal, regarding Obama’s most enormous Big
Lie. Now, after half a year in office, does he even care — or does he instead
simply lack the courage?
It
is clear what a real leader would do — expose and renounce that biggest of all
Big Lies. Only a coward would not.
No comments:
Post a Comment