Submitted
by Tyler Durden on
07/01/2015 16:32 -0400
Financial
experts in New York, London, and Brussels have tut-tutted Greece’s economic
travails as Athens considers its future with the European Union. Why
did they borrow so much money? How can they ever pay it back? Do they think
that much debt is sustainable?
Instead
of pointing fingers at the innumerates running Athens, they should
consider our own situation. Jason Russell of the Washington Examiner shows
how America’s debt projections look
suspiciously like Greece’s recent history.
With all the chaos unravelling in Greece, Congress would be
wise to do what it takes to avoid reaching Greek debt levels. But it’s not a
matter of sticking to the status quo and avoiding bad decisions that would put
the budget on a Greek-like path, because the budget is on that path already.
A quarter-century ago, Greek debt levels were roughly 75
percent of Greece’s economy — about equal to what the U.S. has now. As of 2014,
Greek debt levels are about 177 percent of national GDP. Now, the country is
considering defaulting on its loans and uncertainty is gripping the economy.
In 25 years, U.S. debt levels are projected to reach 156
percent of the economy, which Greece had in 2012. That projection comes from
the Congressional Budget Office’s alternative scenario, which is more realistic
than its standard fiscal projection about which spending programs Congress will
extend into the future.
If Congress leaves the federal budget on autopilot, debt
levels will soar. Instead, spending must be reined in to avoid a Greek-style
meltdown.
While
we’re right to be concerned about 2040, the U.S. is in deep trouble now. Yet if
you mention the debt to most Americans, they’re either confused or indifferent. “But
Obama lowered the deficit.” “Just print more money.“ “It’s Reagan’s fault!”
Since
most graphs look like this, I created my
own user-friendly debt chart focused on three big numbers: Deficit, revenue and
debt. (My first version was
published a couple of years ago. This one is updated with the
most recent figures).
It’s an imperfect analogy, but imagine the green is your
salary, the yellow is the amount you’re spending over your salary, and the red
is your MasterCard statement.
The
chart is brutally bipartisan. Debt increased under Republican presidents and
Democrat presidents. It increased under Democrat congresses and Republican
congresses. In war and in peace, in boom times and in busts, after tax hikes
and tax cuts, the Potomac flowed ever deeper with red ink.
Our leaders like to talk about sustainability. Forget
sustainable — how is this sane?
Yet
when a conservative hesitates before increasing spending, he’s portrayed as a
madman. When a Republican offers a thoughtful plan to reduce the debt over
decades, he’s pushing grannies into the Grand Canyon and pantsing park rangers
on the way out. While the press occasionally griped about spending under Bush,
they implore Obama to spend even more.
When
I posted the earlier version of this chart, the online reaction was intense. A
few on the right thought I was too tough on the GOP while those on the left
claimed it didn’t matter or it’s all a big lie. Others told me that I should
have weighted for this variable or added lines for that trend. They are free to
create their own charts to better fit their narrative and I’m sure they will.
But the numbers shown above can’t be spun by either side.
All of the figures come from the U.S. Treasury and math
doesn’t care about fairness or good intentions. Spending vastly more
than you have, decade after decade, is foolish when done by a Republican or a
Democrat. Two plus two doesn’t equal 33.2317 after you factor in a secret
“Social Justice” multiplier.
If
our current president accumulates debt at the rate of his first six-plus years,
the national debt will be nearly $20 trillion by the time leaves office. That
is almost double what it was when he was first inaugurated.
Like many Americans, I haven’t had the privilege of visiting
Greece. Unfortunately, Greece will be visiting us unless we change things and
fast.
No comments:
Post a Comment