Who
Rules the Anglosphere?
By Moti Nissani on
August 5, 2016
America’s real
rulers have access to immense fortunes, operate behind the scenes, and enjoy
near-absolute power
“[The
Controllers of the Invisible Government] would continue to grow in strength,
until they had the whole silly world, the whole credulous world, the whole
ingenuous world, in their hands. Anyone who would challenge them, attempt
to expose them, show them unconcealed and naked, would be murdered, laughed at,
called mad, ignored, or denounced as a fantasy-weaver.” — Taylor Caldwell, Captains
and the Kings, 1972
The
Controllers
This
article argues that the five major countries of the Anglosphere —
Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, and the US — are governed behind
the scenes by a coterie. This coterie shapes historical events,
accounts for the near-uniformity of these five countries’ political
developments, and enjoys partial or full control of most nations of the
world. As far as we can guess, this coterie is comprised of a few banking
families and their allies and subordinates in the information, corporate,
military, intelligence, secret society, and “religious” worlds.
This coterie
and its members go by such names as the deep state, One Bank, bankers,
oligarchs, Directors, Men in the Shadows,
Owners, or Princes of Power.
In this series, I shall refer to the entity itself as the Invisible Government
and, following Aldous Huxley,
to its head honchos as the Controllers.
What is it
that the Controllers are after? Why aren’t they content with what they
already have? The best guess is that they are just as sick as the
fictional Eddorians:
While
not essentially bloodthirsty—that is, not loving bloodshed for its own sweet
sake—they were no more averse to blood-letting than they were in favor of
it. Any amount of killing which would or which might advance an Eddorian
toward his goal was commendable; useless slaughter was frowned upon, not
because it was slaughter, but because it was useless—and hence inefficient.
And, instead of the multiplicity of goals sought by the various entities of any
race of Civilization, each and every Eddorian had only one. The same one:
power. Power! P-O-W-E-R!! (Doc Smith, Triplanetary,
1948)
Likewise, the
head of the Invisible Government in This Perfect Day reveals
his real motives:
“Chip,
listen to me,” he said, leaning forward, “there’s joy in having it,
in controlling, in being the only one.”
_________
Why
Prove the Reality of the Invisible Government?
I’m
not aware of any near-conclusive proof for the existence of the Invisible
Government. This article attempts to close that gap.
Also, most
people are not even dimly aware of the Invisible Government. And even the few
who are awake can still be mesmerized by the charade of elections, still
subscribe to the fiction that the president of the USA is elected by the people
(in reality, he is selected and disposed of by the Controllers), still look
upon said president as an independent actor, still talk about him as “the most
powerful man in the world.” They fail to see a simple truth: It doesn’t
matter who the president of the USA is, who sits in Congress or on the Supreme
Court, who performs for the mainstream media or organized religion. It
doesn’t matter who writes for the New York Times, who recites at National
Public Radio, who avers whatever in any of the major think tanks. All
these people are jumping jacks. Hopefully, proving the reality of the Invisible
Government will help some people extricate themselves from the Controllers’
pervasive propaganda.
But, you may
wonder: Is it conceivable that so many people mistake puppets for
puppeteers? Hollywood provides a trivial illustration. Most movie
watchers know the actors, but few know the controllers behind the camera:
producers, scriptwriters, and directors.
I shall
explore elsewhere the profound strategic implications of shifting our focus
from the puppets to the puppeteers. If mercenaries are invading your
republic, your most logical target is their financial sponsor. Once you
effectively shine the light on, impoverish, arrest, intimidate, or assassinate
this sponsor, the looting of your country will cease. Likewise, reformers and
revolutionaries must shift their attention from the likes of Monsanto, British
Petroleum, President of the United States, Senior Senator from Arizona,
Governor of Wisconsin, or Chancellor of Germany, to the handful of their
financial sponsors.
_________
Who
are the Controllers?
Jeff Nielson
offers the following brilliant deduction:
At
first glance; the question appears elementary. The One Bank is a financial
crime syndicate which controls 40% of the global economy – a global economy
with annual GDP of roughly $70 trillion. Clearly the owners of the One Bank
would have to be “the world’s richest people” (richest men?).
Here
the Corporate media is only too happy to be of service to us. Once a year; we
are presented with a “world’s richest list”, which is then parroted by all of
the other outlets of the Big Media oligopoly, ad nauseam. Thus, we simply
peruse this list for the names at the top, and we have our “owners” of the One
Bank. Et voila!
More
than 90% of the actual wealth in the world today (real and paper) is hidden
from us.
Instead,
the only rational answer is that there is another, entire tier of the “world’s
richest”, an echelon above all the B-List Billionaires on the official lists.
The real “world’s richest” are, in fact, not billionaires at all, but rather
trillionaires: the Oligarch Trillionaires who own (among other things) the One
Bank.
How
wealthy are these Oligarchs? Not only are these Oligarchs wealthy enough to be
able to hide their names (and fortunes) from all public scrutiny, these
trillionaires wield enough power to even prevent the word “trillionaire” from
being recognized as an official word in our dictionaries.
Nielson then
identifies the Controllers’ with the Rothschild clan.
For my part, I
have been trying to fathom the Controllers’ identities for a long time. I’ve
read many competing speculations but never encountered a definitive
answer. So I have some vague notions about their identity and suspect that
somehow the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers (Rs&Rs) are involved.
Apart from
that, I can only offer a few queries.
To
avoid assassination, the Controllers typically rely on proxies,
shadows, and surveillance mirrors. As we shall soon see, besides the
Rothschilds, the Rockefellers sit atop an immense web of
regimentation. So, are the Rs&Rs collaborating as equals? Are
they competitors? Or are the Rockefellers merely the American agents of
the Rothschilds? (not farfetched—the “mighty” J.P. Morgan was a Rothschild
agent).
Above the
ordinary billionaires, way up in the stratosphere, Nielson says, are the
trillionaires. That could be another way of identifying the men in the
shadows: Do the Rothschild and Rockefeller clans control
trillions? Does the Catholic Church? Do British or Dutch
royalties? Do some secret societies?
The
intelligence agencies, the police, the armed forces of the USA, UK, Israel, and
allied countries, have a license to kill, and they could perhaps do away with
the bankers and become the top dogs. Why don’t they? How do the
Controllers keep these Praetorian Guards in line?
It’s important
to note, however, that our limited information about the Controllers’ identity
in no way invalidates our forthcoming conclusion that the Controllers,
conniving in the background, are the real power brokers. Humans have
always known that water exists, even though they were often ignorant of its
constituent parts. The same goes for the Invisible
Government: Truth-seekers have excellent reasons to believe it exists,
although information about its internal structure and the identity of its
members remains as elusive as they are.
_________
Evidence
Supporting the Existence of the Invisible Government
Insider
Quotes: Many Insiders Tried to Alert us:
Banking
establishments are more dangerous than standing armies. — Thomas Jefferson,
1816
A
power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves,
consisting of many and various powerful interests, combined in one mass, and held
together by the cohesive power of the vast surplus in banks.– John C. Calhoun,
1836
As
a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption
in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavour
to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all
wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.–Abraham
Lincoln
Behind
the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no
allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this
invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt
business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the
day.—From the Platform of President Theodore Roosevelt’s
Progressive (“Bull Moose”) Party
[W]e
have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled
and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government
by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the
majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small
groups of dominant men. – Woodrow Wilson, 1913
“The
real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant
octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation. To depart
from mere generalizations, let me say that at the head of this octopus are the
Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses
generally referred to as the international bankers. The little coterie of
powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for
their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, write
political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of
private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for
high public office only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of
corrupt big business. These international bankers and Rockefeller–Standard Oil
interests control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country.
They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of
office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt
cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a
self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies,
schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public
protection.” — John Hylan,
1922
“I
find that the Morgan [=Rothschild] and Rockefeller groups alone held, together,
341 directorships in 112 banks, railroad, insurance, and other corporations,
and one of this group made an after-dinner speech in which he said that a
newspaper report had asserted that 12 men in the United States controlled the
business of the Nation, and in the same speech to this group he said, ‘And I am
one of the 12 and you the balance, and this statement is correct.’ . . . Unless
we provide for the redistribution of wealth in this country, the country is
doomed; there is going to be no country left here very long.” — Huey Long,
1932
When
the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not
perceive . . . that this country was to supply financial power to an
international superstate — a superstate controlled by international bankers and
international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own
pleasure.”– Congressman Louis T. McFadden,
1932
The
real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial
element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of
Andrew Jackson.— Franklin Delano
Roosevelt, 1933
The
Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully
following a plan to use their economic power to gain political control of first
America, and then the rest of the world. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I
do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope,
generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent. — Congressman Larry P. McDonald,
1975
_________
Views
of Other Knowledgeable Observers
The first
quote is from an outraged journalist (in those bygone days when some mainstream
journalists defended truth and people). The next two are from high-level
captive intellectuals.
The
treason of the Senate! Treason is a strong word, but not too strong, rather too
weak, to characterize the situation in which the Senate is the eager,
resourceful, indefatigable agent of interests [the Rockefellers] as hostile to
the American people as any invading army could be, and vastly more dangerous;
interests that manipulate the prosperity produced by all, so that it heaps up
riches for the few; interests whose growth and power can only mean the
degradation of the people, of the educated into sycophants, of the masses
toward serfdom. — David Graham Phillips, Treason of the Senate,
1906
The conscious
and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the
masses is an
important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen
mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true
ruling power of our country… We are governed, our minds are
molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never
heard of. — Edward Bernays, 1928
There grew up
in the twentieth century a power structure between London and New York which
penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign
policy. . . . In addition to their power over government based on government
financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they
wished them to go by other pressures. the advice given to governments by
bankers . . . was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for
governments, businessmen, and the people generally. — Carroll Quigley
_________
Invisibility
Slips
An article in
one of the Invisible Government’s chief propaganda organs clearly
underscores who is really in charge of the UK:
Governed
either by or on behalf of the people who fleece us, we cannot be surprised to
discover that all public services are being re-engineered for the benefit
of private capital. . . . The financial sector exploits an astonishing
political privilege: the City of London [London’s financial district] is the
only jurisdiction in the UK not fully subject to the authority of parliament.
In fact, the relationship seems to work the other way. Behind the Speaker’s
chair in the House of Commons sits theRemembrancer,
whose job is to ensure that the interests of the City of London are recognised
by the elected members.
In the U.S.,
the Rockefellers played a key role for some 140 years. David Rockefeller
in particular, in rare exhibitionist moments, likes to brag:
We
are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time magazine, and
other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and
respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have
been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject
to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more
sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The
super-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely
preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.
_________
So, we have it
straight from the Psychopath’s mouth: It’s Rockefeller and his lackeys—and
not the nominal governments—who are conspiratorially developing their “plan for
the world” and who possess enough power to do so. If they get their way,
we shall become the slaves to conscience-less bankers like David Rockefeller
and to such “intellectual” flunkeys of theirs as Kissinger, Brzezinski,
Friedman, Greenspan, and Sachs.
In another
overweening moment, David Rockefeller allowed these lines to be inserted into hisown encyclopedia:
Rockefeller
has met with and advised every American President since Eisenhower… President
Jimmy Carter offered him the positions of United States Secretary of the
Treasury and Federal Reserve Chairman but he declined both instead preferring a
private role… Rockefeller has been able to act as bridge to various
interests around the world, including Saddam Hussein and Communist leaders such
as Fidel Castro, Nikita Khrushchev, and Mikhail Gorbachev… Rockefeller also
reportedly has connections to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). David
was extensively briefed on covert intelligence… Additionally, he serves as
the only member of the Advisory Board for the Bilderberg Group… In 1992, he was
selected as a leading member of the Russian-American Bankers Forum, an advisory
group set up by the head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to advise
Russia on the modernization of its banking system, with the full endorsement of
President Boris Yeltsin… Rockefeller began a lifelong association with the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) when he joined as a director in 1949, the
youngest member appointed to that position yet. He would later become head of
the nominating committee for future membership and after that the chairman of
this foreign policy think-tank. In 1965, Rockefeller and other businessmen
formed the Council of the Americas to stimulate and support economic
integration in the Americas. In 1992, at a Council sponsored forum, Rockefeller
proposed a “Western Hemisphere free trade area”, which subsequently became the
Free Trade Area of the Americas in a Miami summit in 1994… Rockefeller helped
found the Trilateral Commission in July 1973.
Given this web
of subjection, given the Rockefellers’ 140-year-long dominance of American
politics, it seems reasonable to suppose that the Rockefeller clans belongs to
the exclusive club of world puppeteers.
_________
Uniformity
Near-identical
policies suggest that the same entity(s) is
pulling strings everywhere.
At times, the
Controllers are careless, treating us to such bizarre spectacle as the “heads”
of Canada and Australia reciting the same speech. Is
it conspiratorial to suppose that they were reading a speech handed to them by
someone possessing more power than they could ever dream of having?
Here is
another trivial, and yet suggestive, example of
convergence:
What
do New York City and London have in common? Both are eliminating their
public libraries against the will of the public and replacing them with luxury
housing, using secretive, deceptive tactics. . . . It is almost as if the
authors of the London and NYC articles copied each other and substituted
different libraries, one from London, the other from NYC.
That grotesque
uniformity applies to all key policies of the Anglosphere and its
colonies. They all fight “terror” and are subjected to “terror,” they all
deliberately and needlessly impoverish and poison their people, they all pay
lip service to environmental stewardship—while steadily undermining the
physical and biological foundations of life itself.
Or take the
curious case of Crimea. Any decent person who knows what really happened
in the Ukraine since the 2014 CIA regime-change operation would agree that the
people of Crimea—mostly anti-fascist Russians—had a right to secede from
Ukraine and join their historical Russian home. Instead, the official
policies of all Western countries is that this act of Russian “aggression”
calls for nuclear brinkmanship that could cost—deliberately or accidentally—the
lives of billions. Only a central authority controlling all these
countries could bring about such suicidal compliance.
How far would
the Controllers go to achieve their stated goal of “full spectrum dominance,”
using the USA as their primary tool? 1. Neither the USA nor any of its allies
is under the remotest threat of being invaded or encroached on by anyone. 2.
The Controllers plan to enrich and empower themselves by investing $10,000
dollars of each American’s household money on weapons of mass destruction (like
the one shown nearby). Couldn’t the average American put that money to better
use elsewhere? 3. The Controllers probably have underground cities to wait out
the aftermath of multiple explosions. Do you have a similar hiding place? 4.
Does their striving for power justify the killing of billions and the possible
extinction—accidental or deliberate—of humanity? 5. Why, in heaven’s name, do
ordinary people take such irresponsible brinkmanship lying down?
_________
Aaron
Russo’s Testimony
Shortly before
dying of cancer, renowned filmmaker Aaron Russo said:
So
I had a friend, Nick Rockefeller, who was one of the Rockefeller family. . . .
And one of the things that we used to talk about . . . the goals of the banking
industry — not just the Federal Reserve System but the private banks in
Germany, and England, all over Italy, all over the world — they all work
together, they’re all central banks. . . . And so, the ultimate goal that these
people have in mind is the goal to create a one-world government, run by the
banking industry. . . there’ll be no more cash. . . . And I used to say to him
that I never really did that because that wasn’t where I was coming from. As
much as I like you, Nick, your way isn’t my way, we’re on the opposite side of
the fence. I don’t believe in enslaving people.
[Rockefeller
said something like]:
What
do you care about them? What do you care about those people?
What difference does it make to you? Take care of your own life. Do the best
you can for you and your family. What do the rest of the people mean to you?
They don’t mean anything to you. They’re just serfs, they’re just people.”
It was
just a lack of caring. And that’s just not who I was. It was just sort of cold.
_________
Massive Concentration
of Wealth
“You’re
looking at the most expensive Congress money can buy.” — Bill Moyers,
2013
Jeff Nielson reminds us:
Roughly 2½ years ago,
readers were introduced to a paradigm of crime, corruption, and control which
they now know as “the One Bank.” First they were presented with a definition
and description of this crime syndicate.
That
definition came via a massive computer model constructed
by a trio of Swiss academics, and cited with favor byForbes magazine. The
computer model was based upon data involving more than 10 million “economic
actors,” both individuals and corporations, and the conclusions which that
model produced were nothing less than shocking.
The One Bank
is “a super-entity” comprised of 144 corporate fronts, with approximately ¾ of
these corporate fronts being financial intermediaries (i.e. “banks”). According
to the Swiss computer model; via these 144 corporate tentacles, the One Bank
controls approximately 40% of the global economy. The only thing more appalling
than the massive size of this crime syndicate is its massive illegality.
Attentive
readers will notice that there is nothing new under the sun: This computer
model echoes what Huey Long said 84 years ago.
The golden
rule of politics states: He who has the gold, rules. Wouldn’t the owners
of ill-gotten almost everything use their wealth to rule the world?
_________
The
Controllers are above the Law
Here is Jeff
Nielson again:
On
a near weekly basis; the Big Banks of the West are caught-and-convicted (but never punished),
perpetrating criminal conspiracies literally thousands of times larger than any
other financial crimes in human history. The U.S. government has now publicly
proclaimed that its Big Banks have a license to steal.
Another
example is provided by a U.S. Congressional report,
entitled “Too Big to Jail: Inside the Obama Justice Department’s Decision Not
to Hold Wall Street Accountable.” This report proved that—“despite
criminal wrongdoing as insidious as supporting major drug cartels and catering
to states considered enemies of the United States”—certain
Big Banks are above the law.
That is
precisely what you would expect from a Department of Justice that is ruled by
the very individuals it is obligated to put behind bars.
_________
Challenging
the Controllers is a Life- or Career-Threatening Business
If
the Invisible Government exists, then its control of government and
information sources confers upon it a license to sideline, smear, incarcerate,
or kill, its influential challengers.
This subject
has been covered extensively elsewhere;
for the moment we only need to mention that 4 of the 12 people cited in this
posting for hostile criticisms of the Invisible Government were probably
assassinated: Presidential candidate Huey Long, muckraking journalist
David Graham Phillips, Congressman Louis McFadden (“heart attack,” having survived
two earlier assassination attempts), and Congressman Larry McDonald (airplane
“accident”).
Four others in
this list died or were incapacitated comparatively young: Ex-President Theodore
Roosevelt died at age 60, President Wilson was incapacitated in office, age 62,
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt died in office (years after surviving a
coup attempt) age 63, and Aaron Russo died of cancer, age 64.
On the other
hand, activist Upton Sinclair died at age 90. Henry A. Wallace died at 77,
Oscar Callaway at 74, and NYC ex-mayor John Hylan died at 67. All four were
viciously smeared by the Rockefeller media. Thanks to those media and the
Controllers’ power, the last three were unceremoniously evicted from the
political world.
These data are
certainly more consistent with the existence of an all-powerful Invisible
Government than with its absence.
_________
The
Acknowledged Power of Billionaires
The
Rockefellers and Rothschilds (Rs&Rs) hand-pick a few
shrewd yet acquiescent individuals to positions of political power (e.g.,
Rockefeller stooges Kissinger or Brzezinski) or, in all likelihood, help some
people become billionaires (e.g., Bill Gates, Mikhail Khodorkovsky). In
return, the politicians promise obedience and the billionaires undertake to toe
the line and never, ever, share their excessive wealth with the
people. Some of these handpicked billionaires—unlike their cautious
masters—are kept in the limelight while promoting their masters’ agenda (so
that, if push comes to shove, they, and not their benefactors, will be
pitchforked).
Here
are a few examples:
Russia’s
Criminal Oligarchs
In Russia, the
Rs&Rs created, out of thin air, a few plundering oligarchs. One,
Mikhail Khodorkovsky, was powerful enough at one point to challenge a popular,
democratically-elected, government.
According to
Andrei Raevsky, a
titanic struggle is being waged between Russian patriots and the Controllers’
oligarchs who are still running Russian finance and banking, key economic
ministries, and the Central Bank. These oligarchs “are, by far, the single
biggest threat . . . to the Russian people as a whole.”
George
Soros
David Galland
and Stephen McBride write:
During the
1980s and 1990s, Soros used his extraordinary wealth to bankroll and fund
revolutions in dozens of European nations, including Czechoslovakia, Croatia,
and Yugoslavia. He achieved this by funneling money to political opposition
parties, publishing houses, and independent media in these nations.
There’s no
doubt about Soros’s great influence on US foreign policy. In an October 1995
PBS interview with Charlie Rose, he said, “I do now have access [to US Deputy
Secretary of State Strobe Talbott]. There is no question. We actually work
together [on Eastern European policy].
If you wonder
why Soros meddled in these nations’ affairs, part of the answer may lie in the
fact that during and after the chaos, he invested heavily in assets in each of
the respective countries.
He then used
Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs to advise the fledgling governments
to privatize all public assets immediately, thus allowing Soros to sell the
assets he had acquired during the turmoil into newly formed open markets.
Having
succeeded in advancing his agenda in Europe through regime change—and profiting
in the process—he soon turned his attention to the big stage, the United
States.”
Why is Soros
spending a fortune establishing a variety of organizations, mimicking his
“successes” in Europe? For one simple reason: to buy political power.
More recently,
Soros has given more than $33 million to the Black Lives Matter group, which
has been involved in outbreaks of social unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, and
Baltimore, Maryland, in 2015. Both of these incidents contributed to a
worsening of race relations across America.
He is intent
on destroying national borders and creating a global governance structure with
unlimited powers. From his comments directed toward Viktor Orbán, we can see he
clearly views national leaders as his juniors, expecting them to become puppets
that sell his narrative to the ignorant masses. . . .
By all
appearances, Soros is conspiring against humanity and is hell-bent on the
destruction of Western democracies.
Soros alone,
it would appear, wields more power than America’s Congress, President, and
Supreme Court. Moreover, is it just a coincidence that Soros carries out
David Rockefeller’s stated agenda?
Sheldon
Adelson
Eric Margolis writes
about Netanyahu:
[In
2015] came the triumphant visit to Congress by Israel’s rightwing prime
minister . . . Congress put on a truly revolting display of sycophancy,
servility and brownnosing . . . that included 23 rapturous standing ovations.
If you have an
exceptionally strong stomach, you might want to watch this video:
_________
This
is neither the first time, nor the worst: In 2011, in a disgraceful, shocking,
display of subservience, the thoroughly corrupt Netanyahu received 29 standing
ovations.
Why are these
politicians openly betraying humanity and the American people? The
intrigues of one minor billionaire, working probably with the explicit or tacit
consent of the Invisible Government, provide a partial answer.
“[Sheldon Adelson]
has already threatened to invest unlimited sums of money to prevent the
reelection of any Senator or Representative who is absent from Netanyahu’s
speech.”
Gambling
godfather Sheldon Adelson invested $92 million in the 2012 presidential
election cycle
_________
Historical
Episodes Illustrating the Invisible Government’s Enormous Power
American
“Medicine:” Follow the Rockefellers
No
other peaceful population, probably since the 1839 Opium Wars, has been so
devastated by a drug epidemic encouraged by a government.—James Petras and
Robin Eastman-Abaya (Genocide by Prescription)
Cutthroat
oilmen, moneychangers, and despoilers of everything: John D. Rockefeller Sr.
and Jr.
Isn’t it
curious that the life expectancy at
birth of people born in Spain or Switzerland is 83 years, while in the USA it
is 79 (38th place in the world)—even though per capita spending on health in
the USA is roughly 3.5 times greater than
in Spain (in 2013, $9,146 vs. $2581)? Have you ever asked yourself why a Cuban
born today is likely to live as long as her American counterpart, even though
the per capita spending on health in the USA is 15 times larger than in Cuba?
As Americans .
. . wonder how the country became enslaved to the highest healthcare costs in
the world, we turn back the pages to look at how the modern medical paradigm
came together in the early 20th century, courtesy of the Rockefeller Foundation
and their cronies.
[The
healthcare industry came into being] “as a result of a concerted and carefully
plotted plan that was laid out generations ago by people with malice of
forethought. . . . By taking over the medical industry in 1910 through studies
which he made through the Carnegie foundation, John D. Rockefeller emerged as
the kingpin of the medical monopoly in the United States. And he now presided
over an allopathic system of medicine, controlled through every legislature by
accreditation of hospitals, control of physicians, control of medications and
which is essentially what we have today. . . . Interestingly enough, the
Rockefellers control every major drug company in the world, and when I say
control, I mean directly. . . . I think we understand that profit isn’t in and
of itself a motivating driving factor for the David Rockefellers and others of
the world. . . . America became the most expensive healthcare system in the
world . . . through methodical planning over the course of generations by
people with almost unthinkable amounts of wealth.
You might want
to click on the nearby link, before your next chemotherapy session, bi-annual
dental X-rays, or visit to a conventional physician, dentist, or pharmacist:
Prohibition: Follow
the Rockefellers
Using alcohol
as an alternative to oil would actually drive down food
prices, help enrich the soil, and have a lot of other benefits. . .
. So if alcohol can provide a cheaper and better fuel than gasoline,
why doesn’t anyone talk about it today?
Well, John D.
Rockefeller, under the ruse of Christian temperance, gave 4 million dollars to
a group of old ladies and told them to fight for Prohibition (they successfully
used the money to buy off Congress). Why? Rockefeller owned Standard Oil, the
main company pushing gas as an alternative fuel to alcohol. By getting Congress
to pass Prohibition laws, Rockefeller eliminated his competition.
Global
Brainwashing Operations: Follow the Rockefellers
William Hearst
remarked: “The newspapers control the nation.” The Controllers understood
that, and wisely decided to subvert most information sources. After all,
why should criminals who can print as much money as they wish, steal national
gold hordes, manipulate governments, and possess a license to sideline, steal,
defame, and kill, have to put up with inconvenient truths? Why should they
have to tolerate the likes of David Graham Phillips writing in a main
circulation magazine about their crime syndicate?
The wily
Rockefellers rose to the occasion, with the sad result that most
people—intellectuals included—remain clueless because they read newspapers,
listen to radio, watch television, go to school, and study “history” books.
We may note in
passing that only one in a thousand sees the obvious: As in the case of
cyanide poisoning, the only way to prevent brain poisoning is to avoid
exposure.
In 1917,
Congressman Oscar Callaway explained how the Controllers colonized our minds:
In March,
1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest,
and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the
newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in
the United States and sufficient number of them to control, generally, the
policy of the daily press. . . . They found it was only necessary to
purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was
reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an
editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information
regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and
other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests
of the purchasers.
To be sure,
truth served money and power long before 1915. Thomas Jefferson famously said
in 1807:
I
really look with commiseration over the great body of my fellow citizens, who,
reading newspapers, live and die in the belief that they have known something
of what has been passing in the world in their time.
The 1915 and
subsequent campaigns merely refined the conversion of mainstream journalists
into presstitutes. Here, for instance, is Upton Sinclair,
writing in 1919:
I was
determined to get something done about the atrocious conditions under which
men, women and children were working the Chicago stockyards. In my efforts
to get something done, I was like an animal in a cage. The bars of this cage
were newspapers, which stood between me and the public; and inside the cage I
roamed up and down, testing one bar after another, and finding them impossible
to break.
Every
seeker of compassion and rationality since then would
recognize Sinclair’s cage as her own.
_________
Moti Nissani is
the compiler of “Revolutionary’s Toolkit.” This
article first appeared in The Greanville Post. Many thanks
to Dr. Rowan Wolf for helping to improve an earlier draft.
No comments:
Post a Comment