4 August
201616:32
Foreign
Ministry Commissioner for Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law
Konstantin Dolgov’s interview with Rossiya Segodnya International Information
Agency, August 4, 2016
1399-04-08-2016
Question: The
media have reported that Moscow is ready to exchange Russian pilot Konstantin
Yaroshenko, now serving a prison term in the United States, for US citizens who
have been convicted by Russian courts. Are Russia and the United States
currently discussing prisoner exchanges?
Konstantin
Dolgov: Indeed, we have repeatedly called on the US side,
during our efforts to return Konstantin Yaroshenko home as soon as possible, to
use the relevant international law mechanisms, including the 1983 Council of
Europe Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons, which stipulates the
possibility of exchanging and returning sentenced persons who would eventually
serve prison terms at home. But, so far (we hope, so far) we have not heard the
US side’s readiness for this.
We have also
suggested some other options to the US side, including the possibility of US
President Barack Obama pardoning Mr Yaroshenko. As his presidency draws to a
close, President Obama has pardoned numerous prisoners, including those
sentenced to life for grave crimes. Of course, neither Mr Yaroshenko nor Viktor
Bout has committed any similar crimes. Their guilt was not proven during
politically motivated trials. Their allegedly criminal intentions, for which
they were sentenced in the United States, were not proven either.
The President
of the United States could show mercy, considering the dire humanitarian plight
of Mr Yaroshenko. So far, we do not see the US side’s readiness to meet our
urgent requests halfway. Nor do we see a desire to assess the humanitarian
nature of the situation with Mr Yaroshenko that was created by US special
services and law enforcement agencies. For a long time, they have prevented him
from undergoing a comprehensive medical check-up, and he is not receiving
proper treatment. Of course, all this affects his health. US authorities which,
unfortunately, ignore their international law obligations are responsible for
the life and health of that Russian citizen.
We will
continue our efforts to secure the release of Russian citizens. The US side is
well aware of various options. Most importantly, the United States should show
political will. So, far we don’t see such political will.
Question: Does
this mean that the United States fails to reply to all our requests?
Konstantin
Dolgov: Doubtless, we conduct one-sided dialogue with the US.
We voice our concerns, suggest various options, including those that involve
the Council of Europe Convention, but so far we do not see any readiness on the
part of the United States.
Question: Has
there been a response from the US authorities concerning a comprehensive
medical exam of Konstantin Yaroshenko with the participation of
Russian-speaking doctors?
Konstantin
Dolgov: Regrettably, the US authorities have set many
preconditions for this. For example, one of these is that each doctor should be
licensed in New Jersey, where Yaroshenko is being kept in prison. We made
different proposals but they remain unanswered. We are ready to accept a
medical exam outside the prison; doctors do not have to be Russian but it is
important that they speak the language. Our priority is to protect the health
of a Russian citizen rather than press one of our proposals on the Americans.
We are ready to be flexible but, regrettably, the Americans have done nothing
so far.
Mr Yaroshenko
says it’s a lie that he was granted proper medical aid.
When we spoke
with Mr Yaroshenko over the phone, he confirmed that, just as the Russian
authorities, he has very serious grounds for concern over his health. This is
an urgent issue. Political aspects aside, the health of our citizen is at
stake. We will insist that the US authorities take into account our concerns.
Question: What
are his chances for returning home?
Konstantin
Dolgov: As a diplomat I should remain optimistic but,
unfortunately, there is no tangible headway on behalf of the US. However, this
doesn’t mean that we will let it go, neither in Mr Yaroshenko’s case nor other
similar incidents. That said, the politicisation of this strictly humanitarian
issue has been over the top in Washington.
Question: What
about the defence of the rights of another Russian citizen: Viktor Bout?
Konstantin
Dolgov: Regrettably, Mr Bout is in a similar position. We are
actively helping the attorneys of Mr Bout and Mr Yaroshenko but, regrettably,
the US justice system is again demonstrating its biased attitude and reluctance
to consider serious evidence that their attorneys have collected in favour of
revising both cases.
Mr Bout is
being kept in unacceptable conditions. He is still in a separate cell for the
worst criminals, although the US authorities do not conceal that he is not a
source of special concern and does not threaten US national security. For this
reason, we cannot understand why he is still kept in this separate cell. All
appeals by his attorneys remain unanswered, as well as their well-grounded
requests to transfer him to the normal detention regime.
Luckily, he
does not have health problems like Mr Yaroshenko. And like Mr Yaroshenko, he
tries to keep himself in good shape and is not losing his spirit. We respect
the courage of these people. Neither of them agreed to make a deal with the US
authorities and admit their guilt, although attempts to subject them to
wrongful psychological pressure continue. The refusal to transfer Mr Bout from
a separate cell and denial of a medical exam for Mr Yaroshenko are indirect
forms of this wrongful pressure.
Question: Has
Russia been notified by the United States about a possibility of extraditing
Ravil Mingazov, who is kept in Guantanamo? Could this happen under the current
US Administration?
Konstantin
Dolgov: I’ve seen these reports but there was no official
notification. We hope that after this decision, if it is confirmed, the US
authorities will release Mingazov without delay and extradite him to Russia.
Our Embassy is maintaining contact with the US authorities on this issue.
After 14 years
the Americans admitted that it is inexpedient to keep Mr Mingazov in this
special prison. Well, better late than never. We believe his rights and lawful
interests were crudely violated from the start and under the US legislation as
well. This is unacceptable. Now the Obama Administration is making frenzied
attempts to shut down this prison or transfer it somewhere else or scatter the
prisoners, because Congress does not consent to transferring them to US
territory.
Question: Are
you going to visit the United States in the near future to discuss the adoption
of Russian children? Has the US side confirmed its readiness to discuss
Russia’s concerns?
Konstantin
Dolgov: In a note sent to the Russian Foreign Ministry, the
US side refused point-blank to hold special meetings of the Russian
interdepartmental delegation with the US State Department and the Department of
Justice to discuss a host of long overdue bilateral problems of the adoption
issue. We have been actively proposing such meetings during the past few
months, since last year. This and other notes confirm that Washington continues
to hold a very unconstructive position on this urgent humanitarian issue. The
US approach shows that Washington is merely paying lip service to its
commitment to the protection of the rights and legal interests of US-adopted
Russian children. The US attempt to erode the discussion of this issue in a
bilateral consular dialogue is obviously at variance with its importance and
scale.
This
irresponsible position of the US confirms once again that the passing of the
Dima Yakovlev Law that banned adoptions of Russian children by US citizens in
December 2012 was well grounded. Washington is doing harm to itself by
occupying this position.
We are not
avoiding consular dialogue, but this issue is much too urgent to be discussed
only within its framework. We are ready to discuss it there, too, but there was
a special channel of dialogue that the Americans are closing down now. This is
regrettable and shows their reluctance to seriously resolve the accumulated
problems. We hope they will revise their position. I’m ready to come to the United
States any time or meet them here to discuss these problems. At any rate, we’ll
continue using all available political and diplomatic means for insisting on
strict observance of the rights, freedoms and legal interests of Russian minors
in American adoptive families. We hope international organisations and
agencies, including the UN Human Rights Council and human rights champions,
will pay special attention to this issue, which we consider a priority.
Question:
Has Moscow received any official notice regarding the detention of Russian
citizen Dmitry Ukrainsky in Thailand at the request of the FBI?
Konstantin
Dolgov: So far, according to available information, there
has been no such official notification from the Thai side about the arrest of
the Russian citizen, nor has there been a reply to the note sent by the Embassy
of Russia in Bangkok on July 16. The note emphasised the unacceptability of
extraditing the Russian citizen to the United States and the need to resolve
the issue exclusively by legal means.
Currently,
talks between the prosecutor general’s offices are underway in Thailand, and
issues related to Dmitry Ukrainsky’s case are being discussed as well. I can
confirm that the Prosecutor General’s Office had sent a request to the Thai
authorities regarding extradition of the Russian citizen to Russia.
We hope that
our Thai partners will not succumb to pressure from Washington, which is
demanding the extradition of Mr Ukrainsky to the United States, as was the case
with Viktor Bout in 2011.
Question: What
are the odds of our request for extradition being granted? Washington sent its
preliminary inquiry first, followed by Russia.
Konstantin
Dolgov: The general prosecutor's offices are discussing this
issue. We hope that Thailand will take into account the friendly relations
between our countries and will extradite Mr Ukrainsky to his country of
citizenship. The American practice of hunting for our citizens all over the
world is totally unacceptable. It constitutes a violation of international law
and US-Russia bilateral agreements, in particular, the 1999 agreement on mutual
legal assistance. We will continue to strongly protest and fight such practices
regardless of whether a particular citizen is guilty or not guilty.
In this
particular case, the Russian investigators have reasons to believe that Mr
Ukrainsky has violated Russian laws. If so, the investigation should take place
in Russia, and procedures must be held in Russia as well. If the Americans are
interested in combating crime, we should work on this together within the legal
framework and according to the rules.
Question:
Mr Ukrainsky’s detention in Thailand at the US request is not the first such
case. What legal steps can be taken to protect Russian citizens?
Konstantin
Dolgov: We are holding consultations with Thailand to expand
and adapt the legal framework in order to avoid, in future, situations
involving violations of the rights of our citizens, and, at the same time, to
provide closer cooperation through our prosecutor general’s offices and
ministries of justice to address the issues of combating crime.
Incidents
similar to those of Viktor Bout and Dmitry Ukrainsky, which will, hopefully,
not materialise, should be avoided in the first place. I think it is not only
in our interests, but in Thailand’s interests as well.
Question:
Racial discrimination in the US was a major domestic issue during the
presidency of Barack Obama. What, do you think, should the next president do to
address this?
Konstantin
Dolgov: The problem of racial discrimination in the United
States has been in a latent phase for many decades and has recently become
exacerbated. Clearly, all attempts by the Obama administration to bring relief
to this situation using some half-hearted measures have failed, and protests
are gaining momentum. Unfortunately, things are getting worse and are further
provoked by disproportionate actions by the police, who often kill unarmed
black US citizens in situations where they do not pose an immediate threat.
This has happened on many occasions, and American law enforcement agencies
should deal with these situations on their own.
We believe
that the issue should be addressed systematically and consistently. Providing
concrete recipes would not be correct, but I think that the American authorities
should have a pretty clear idea of what racial discrimination is all about.
Most importantly, they should focus on human rights in their own country and
refrain from mentoring other nations, including Russia. They should cut down on
lecturing others, and focus more on human rights in their own country, because
what is happening there is a major widespread human rights issue. This problem
is recognised by the Obama administration, because not recognising it is
impossible. We have yet to see effective steps, though. I think that the next
US president, whoever it may be, will have to deal with a difficult and complex
legacy.
Question:
You recently said that Russia had asked Kiev to provide information about
Russians who are serving time in Ukraine. Did you receive an answer? When can
we expect them to be exchanged for Ukrainian prisoners in Crimea? Are there any
preliminary estimates regarding the number of prisoners? What are the Ukrainian
authorities promising?
Konstantin
Dolgov: On June 28, the Russian Foreign Ministry sent to the
Ukrainian Embassy in Russia a note concerning the failure to submit, or delayed
submission, by the Ukrainian side, of information about detained Russian
citizens in Ukraine. In this document, the Foreign Ministry also asked to
provide the exact number of Russian citizens in pre-trial and other detention
centres in Ukraine. No reply has yet been received.
According to
human rights activists, and based on requests by relatives of the detained
Russian citizens, we note that the problem has taken on a systemic dimension.
The Ukrainian authorities do not provide information about the death, arrest or
detention of Russian citizens on their territory, and do not provide timely
consular access, which violates the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and
the bilateral consular agreement. We will seek an answer to this note.
Unfortunately,
the Ukrainian authorities are no strangers to violations of international law
and bilateral agreements with Russia. We will seek to redress this situation
and to investigate all cases where there’s information about the use of torture
with regard to our citizens. The time is ripe to put an end to arbitrary
behaviour in Ukraine, and Kiev should revise its position and listen to the
demands of international human rights organisations and the UN Human Rights
Council.
Reportedly,
Ukraine may have hundreds of people who have been charged with political
accusations related to the internal Ukrainian conflict in Donbass. We believe
that the Ukrainian side will not delay its response to our request, and that it
will be meaningful.
No comments:
Post a Comment