The Art
of War
PESCO is born from NATO’s rib
by Manlio Dinucci
After a
60 year gestation period, Roberta Pinotti, the Defense Minister announces that
“PESCO” is on the verge of being born in December. PESCO is a EU “Permanent Structured
Cooperation” in the military sector. To
start with, 23 of the 27 EU member states are participating in it.
Jens
Stoltenberg, NATO’s Secretary General, explains what this cooperation might
entail. Participating in the EU’s Council for Foreign Affairs, he emphasizes,
“the importance, evidenced by so many European leaders, of European Defense needing
to be developed so that it does not compete with NATO, but rather complements
it”. The first way of achieving this is for each European member state to
increase its individual military expenditure. PESCO establishes that one of the
“joint ambitious and rather onerous undertakings” is “the periodic increase in
real terms of the defense balance sheets in order to reach the agreed
objectives”.
21 of the 27 EU member
states are NATO members. NATO’s
continuously increasing budget now has the additional expenditure of the
European Defense Fund through which the EU will earmark 1.5 billion euro per
year to finance research projects in military technology and to buy shared arms
systems. This will be the base line figure, destined to increase over the
years.
On top of PESCO, are additional costs for “developing new capabilities
and preparing to participate together in military operations”.
“Capabilities
complementing NATO requirements”: on 8th November 2017, NATO’s North Atlantic
Council resolved to adapt the command structure so that, “the capacity to
strengthen the Allies quickly and effectively” in Europe would be increased. For this purpose, two new commands are
established. A Command for the Atlantic, with the mandate of maintaining “free
and secure maritime lines of communication between Europe and the United
States, vital for our Transatlantic Alliance”.
A Command for Mobilization, tasked
with “improving NATO military forces’ capability to move through Europe”. To
enable forces and arms to be moved rapidly on European territory, the NATO
Secretary General explains that European countries must “remove many bureaucratic
obstacles”. Much has been done since 2014, but there is still a lot of work that
needs doing so that “national laws that facilitate military forces passing across
borders are fully applied”. Moreover Stoltenberg adds that NATO needs to have
available in Europe, sufficient capability to transport soldiers and arms, largely
provided by the private sector.
It is even more important for Europe’s “civil
infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, railways, airports and ports to be improved– so that they are adapted to NATO’s
military requirements”.
In other words, European countries must carry out, at
their own expense, works to make the civil infrastructure fit for their
military use: for example a bridge that
is fit for the traffic of trams and lorries will have to be strengthened to
allow tanks to pass. This is the strategy that PESCO forms part.
This strategy
is the expression of dominant European interests that, while colliding with US
interests, then realign themselves in harmony with them, within a NATO under US
Command. This occurs whenever the fundamental interests of the West endangered
by a world that is changing, are at stake.
So when the “Russian Threat” kicks off, it will be
confronted by a “United Europe”, which, while slashing its welfare expenditure and
blocking off its internal borders to migrants, balloons its military
expenditure and dismantles its internal borders when it comes to soldiers and
tanks, so that they can roam about freely within.
Il
manifesto, 21th November, 2017
Translator:
Anoosha Boralessa
No comments:
Post a Comment