FULL TRANSCRIPT OF DARK JOURNALIST INTERVIEW OF CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS

FULL TRANSCRIPT OF DARK JOURNALIST INTERVIEW OF 

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS

Also available  HERE

Elite Endgame, Transhumanist Agenda & 2016 Political Race  

   

DJ: Hi, this is Dark Journalist. Today, we're excited to welcome back former US assistant housing secretary and financial expert, Catherine Austin Fitts. Now Catherine's latest Solari Report, "Where to Stash the Cash" contains many references to an "Endgame" being played out among financial elites and sovereign governments, that may have stunning implications for our future.  

Catherine, it's just great to have you back here on the show. 

CAF: It's good to be back.

DJ: One of the things that I noticed, while reading your latest report, "Where to Stash the Cash in 2016?" which is just a fascinating read and really contains some powerful information. What are these frequent references that you make to the "Endgame" and so let's start off with that. What is this Endgame all about? 

CAF: Well, I think what you're referring to is the Endgame on centralization; the assertion of what George HW Bush used to call "Centralizing resources into tighter and Righter hands," and we are watching the shift into a new phase of centralization...

...My subscribers and clients are beginning to feel the pinch; people who hadn't felt that pinch before are now beginning to feel the pinch and it's getting very uncomfortable. 

DJ: Why do you think this is happening now? Why is this the Endgame?

CAF: Daniel, I can't tell you. There's a couple of possibilities. One is that it's like a machine that works from outside in and now, it's getting down to the core! 

The other thing is, as the debt growth model wears out, the system is hungry for resources and cash, so there's all sorts of groups that it's left alone but now, it's coming for them, too... Whereas before, things that would only happen in the poorer neighborhoods. Now, they're happening in the wealthy neighborhoods. 

Some of the wealthy are beginning to experience it and feel it...They were thinking, "It's not going to happen to me. I'm in this bubble and we're excluded from these problems" - but now, that the system has eaten the subsidy on the edges, now it's coming for the subsidy, at the heart of the system.

So, whether political or economic, the easy pickings are over and it's coming at the heart of the matter. 

DJ: So we may be, in this Presidential Election year, be looking at a big change in the economy. Maybe this is a major turning point?

CAF: I think it's a turning point for the people who have been untouched and are now being touched - but I do think we're shifting into a new phase because, for example, up until this point, you needed a certain number of people running the train tracks and now for example, what you're seeing that in the Presidential Election in the United States is you've had all sorts of people who were on the establishment payrolls, who figured out that when this election is over, they're going to be thrown off the bus. 

So, we've re-engineered manufacturing, we re-engineered...all sorts of different sectors, now we're going in and re-engineering management...one of the things happening, in the next phase is you're seeing a very significant re-engineering of the management classes...Executives are suddenly waking up to the fact that they're being re-engineered! 

Part of it is technology...Before, you needed five people and now you need two and you can globalize one to India. So, that's less bankers at JPMorgan-Chase!

DJ: When you look at this period that we're in and all that's come before us; we had the labor unions and they were busted by sending their jobs and all of our manufacturing over to China and Mexico; so if we look at it now, they're going to start outsourcing these executive jobs too, to get even cheaper labor costs for the corporations.

The last time we did that with blue collar jobs, we got massive unemployment here at home; a lower quality of life, all around for average Americans and finally, massive amounts of people living on Food Stamps. So that definitely sapped the vitality of the average American. What's going to happen when they outsource these white collar jobs? 

CAF: Well, remember what happened with manufacturing is yes, we moved the manufacturing abroad and busted the unions. The problem, in that process was was not that we did that; I would argue, because technology said, "OK we can do it for lower price"...the problem was that we purposefully shut off the flow of capital and equity capital to the group that had been busted, so that they couldn't start small business and compete effectively in the marketplace. 

So, we used regulation and we used the manipulation of the financial system to basically make sure they couldn't come back in the game. So I think there was a disenfranchisement which was counter to the law and counter to what was in the best interests of mutual fund investors and the taxpayers. 

It's very expensive for the taxpayers, to engineer that disenfranchisement. I think that the problem now, when you do the same thing to the executive class, the question is, are you going to shut off the cost of capital to them - and it looks to me like you're planning on it.

DJ: Catherine, what is a real telltale sign that these globalist forces are moving into this Endgame phase...What will be the character of the narrative that they come up with, that will act as a sign for us to know that they're really on the move. 

CAF: This is going to sound like a shifting the conversation but I just finished whole series of interviews related to the latest documentaries on on vaccinations. Have you seen 'Vaxxed' yet?

DJ: Yes, 'Vaxxed' is amazing. It's the film that investigated the cover-up by the CDC of these links between vaccines in this case, the MMR vaccine and autism. 

Robert DeNiro got behind this film and actually got it in the Tribeca Film Festival, which is incredible and the media frenzy that came out of that was over the top so they put heavy political pressure on the Festival and they pulled it, so you know I think that only made people more curious about what was happening there. 

CAF: Well, one piece in 'Vaxxed' relates to the increased growth rate in autism. Basically, in the United States we're facing an epidemic. We've gone from one in 10,000 to now, depending on who you talk to, one in 65 to 25. There's one researcher from MIT, who's interviewed in 'Vaxxed', who says, at the current rate, in 2032, one out of every two children will be autistic and 80% of the males will be autistic.

DJ: Wow. That's an amazing statistic. 

CAF: ...and one of the focuses of the documentary is a CDC whistleblower, who basically describes African-American males as four times as likely to get autism as white males - and males are, I think they're many times more likely to get autism than females.

So, let's just connect the dots between two things: we have a huge promotional campaign going on, for the last 10 years, trying to promote the idea that the way to solve the problems in the world is to put women in leadership positions in business and government so we'll end the corruption by putting women in charge (ha!)

So, I that's just one thing that's happening, while you're rolling out having schedules of vaccinations and mandating triple-shot vaccinations through the schools that we know will dramatically increase that the likelihood of autism, in net.

Now, let's take a look at those two things. One of the estimates I heard from one of the mothers who was interviewed in 'Vaxxed' is that the cost to family of having an autistic child is $5 million.

DJ: That's devastating!

CAF: So, and I've had clients with autistic kids and what I will tell you is the ramifications, economically to a household, to a marriage to a family and to the siblings - to everybody, of an autistic child can be absolutely devastating. So when you talk about one out of every two children, you're talking about wreaking havoc with American marriages, with American households - everything.

Now, let's go back to what we're talking about: out-sourcing jobs in the executive class. You know, it's one thing for the executive class to deal with that process. It's another thing for the executive class to deal with that process, if every other household has an autistic child. 

DJ: It would definitely wipe out any chance they had...

CAF: Right. So that's vaccines. Let's talk about GMOs and food and health. I was just watching the trailer for Jeffrey Smith's new movie. 

So, let's add to that, one out of every two households is getting sick because of GMO food and bad food supply. 

DJ: Now, GMOs have, in many ways been exposed but is that slowing down their growth, at all in the marketplace? 

CAF: It's clearly making a dent and one of the reasons it's making a dent, Daniel is the marketplace is saying "No!"

If you look at the percentage growth rates of fresh and organic food, it's off the charts. It's one of the few areas that's going gangbusters in the economy. The message from the consumer is: "We don't want it" - but if you look at the percentage of people who are still eating it, it's very high - and the and the health ramifications are devastating.

DJ: Sure. 

CAF: Remember, even if you're growing all your food and eating very "clean", your taxes and the quality of your life, is very much going to be dependent - you know - everybody around you is eating the crap, it's going to impact your life, in many different ways, both financially and personally. 

DJ: This goes to your ecosystem point, also. While it's true that we can only take responsibility for our own actions, if we're making good choices; going organic - and the general public is being duped into eating GMO foods, then it will affect everyone, across the board, in terms of the general kind of unhealthy environment that it creates. 

CAF: Right. The problem executive class has is the problem everybody has, which is you're getting hit on multiple fronts by multiple forces. 

Your banker's stealing from you. So, let's say you were an investor in Madoff and you've got a real food-fight, to find real food, unless you're sitting next to the right store and you're having to take your kids out of public school because of the vaccination policies, so you put them in private school or home school or else, they're getting attacked by Common Core - and the next thing you know, you're getting a notice saying you have to pay a fine, because you don't have the right healthcare policy, under Obamacare. 

So, if you look at every aspect of both your income statement, your expenses, your balance sheet - you're getting attacked by centralization on all sides and each aspect of the centralization is trying to basically harvest you, financially for something else - so the least of your problems is that you're getting laid off!

DJ: Right. I can definitely see that and what I find so fascinating is, with you saying that these things are starting to come to a breaking point this year, this is how 2016 started. We talked about DeNiro backing the 'Vaxxed' film but there was also Trump in the debates, talking about 9/11 and the inconsistencies there and the 28-page report that implicated the Saudis, that the Administration won't release and then we had Hillary Clinton on late night talk shows, talking about reviewing the secret files on UFOs and even new revelations around the JFK assassination 50 years later. 

I can honestly say, we haven't had a year that started with a tone like this in a long time and I seriously wonder if the establishment is running around, just trying to figure out how to co-opt these subjects and put them back in the box because the real questions are out there, in the public about what the truth is about all these things.

CAF: Well, here's some questions. Trump - I think the person who pulled it out of the box the most is Trump...Trump hit vaccines, he hit Common Core, he hit government statistics, he's hit, not all of them - but a lot. The way he did this has opened things up right now and it's almost given people permission to start talking about these things.

DJ: Definitely, yes.

CAF: When Trump first stated he would run, I said he would be dead shortly and I think one of the things that kept him alive is by punching a crack in the dam, again and again and again. Then you had other people. On vaccines, Bob Wright, the former head of NBC came out with a book. 

Part of this, Daniel, from 2006 to 2012, we lived through the financial coup d'état/Endgame and and that really woke people up. It shook their faith in the establishment but they were willing to go along and see what happened and when things haven't come back and they haven't gotten better, now they're starting to say, "OK, what can we do?" 

So I'll give you a perfect example. From 1998-2009 I wrote and warned people about the mortgage fraud and the extent of it and one of the things I discovered is nobody believed what I said - and even in 2009 - after the big drop, what I discovered is financial people really still didn't understand or believe me. 

In 2012, one of the top commentators on the web - financial commentators on the alternative web - wrote an article and it started off, "If this is true, 'Kaboom!' It's all over," and and then he started, "Catherine Austin Fitts has been saying this for a long time." And then, he started to describe the extent of the mortgage fraud and I could tell, from writing, that to the first time in his life, he understood; it started to dawn on him, what I was saying was true. Until that moment, he couldn't fathom it. 

So the next week, I'm visiting a friend of mine, who's a very significant professional in the financial world, who I've known for many, many years. Long-standing close collaboration. I would have told you this is a person who trusts me. So, I'm telling him about this article, that said that I've been saying this for a long time - and the guy who looks at me, stares straight in the eye and said, "Well, you know, I have to confess I've never believed you." 

And I said, "After 27 trillion dollars of bailouts? Let's get the numbers straight: At the time we paid the $27 trillion in bailouts, $8 trillion would have retired all the single-family mortgages in this country."

DJ: Incredible! 

CAF: You could have paid them all off! 

So, it's more than 300%! $27 trillion is more than 300% of what it would take to pay off every single-family mortgage in the country. 

So I said, "After 27 trillion dollars of bailouts, you still don't believe me about mortgage fraud?" and he said, "Well, I'm starting to."

DJ: Ha! There's so many layers of denial to get through there, it's amazing.

CAF: Now, I was the former Assistant Secretary of Housing, I was a former Managing Director at a private equity firm. My company got taken down because they wanted to steal and shut down our databases. I've documented this all - but it is so hard for people to fathom. What one guy told me, "Look, you're telling me is the sky is not the sky. You're telling me this sky is really a ceiling and there's a sky above it - and I just can't go there." 

DJ: Yes, and this is the core of the problem. They can't go there. So, it's actually a consciousness issue, if you think about it; where they can't grasp that the official version of reality is so different from the facts on the ground, so they just don't want to see it, at all.

CAF: Well, there's multiple phenomena - but they don't want to go there unless the Establishment will go there, because they're like, here's Reality and then here's Official Reality - and Official Reality has become its own morphogenic field. 

Its MORE than just an Official Story - it's now a field - and they don't want to leave the field, because they perceive being in the field as being "safe". 

And the message is, they get laid off - and guess what? "It's no longer safe! There's a smaller field - and you're not in it!"

Then, they say, "Well then, if I can't get in the smaller field, if I don't have a locker in the underground base, why don't I just check out reality?"

DJ: Right - so now, they have to go in search of the real thing. 

CAF: They leave and they go watch Dark Journalist! "OK, well now I'm going to watch Dark Journalist and figure out what our reality is," right?

DJ: Ha! Exactly, and now we're going deeper than ever, because you're here! 

What I really find amazing is that you've called the 2016 presidential election 'The Kingsmen Campaign', after the new movie that deals with entrainment technology and there are elements in this campaign that are touching on the untouchable, in a sense, as you mentioned with Trump, a moment ago. 

Now, Trump poses an interesting riddle, here because, as a billionaire hotel and casino developer, he must have incredible inside connections - and yet, the establishment media despises him with a passion, which makes him, in this scenario an outsider.

CAF: Of course, he's not an outsider! Let's let's go back. Why did Las Vegas get created? 

DJ: Well, Mafia money is part of it. 

CAF: Las Vegas is here - and right below it, is where? Area 51. 

DJ: Exactly.

CAF: Go to the airport in Las Vegas every morning and what's happening? Tons of people are getting in a special plane to fly to Area 51 to do their job, right?

DJ: Yes. 

CAF: Right. OK. So what did Las Vegas do? So, when Barry Seal was running drugs into Mena Arkansas, he would stop at Area 51. Daniel Hopsicker, when he was doing the research on Seal, said to me, "Well, why would Barry Seal -- ?" 

DJ: On the surface, it seems like a weird combination.

CAF: I said, "Danny, he was dropping off the money...Because Area 51 was a "Cash Need", OK? Mena, Arkansas; the drug-dealing was a "Cash Cow" and the goal of the Cash Cow was to generate cash for the Need, right? 

So, I told Daniel, "Look, it's very simple, you know. Barry Seal was dropping by, to drop off the money. It's pretty simple.

DJ: Good point.

CAF: So why did everybody want a casino? Because, you know, if Las Vegas is getting all the money laundering, right? Why did they want Cuba? The Agency's plan was Cuba would do the casinos on the East Coast; Las Vegas could to do the West Coast - and you had it covered. 

So, when they didn't get Cuba back in 1963, you needed another plan. What was the plan? Atlantic City, right? 

DJ: Right.

CAF: OK, so why would the New York banks want Atlantic City? 

DJ: That's a good question. Probably to give them the East Coast Mafia contacts, that they would need and to make money laundering a more expanded operation, with that incredible New York financial engine.

CAF: Whoever they wanted to deal with, you know, they had a need for significant money flows being handled through casino operations - and Atlantic City was it, OK? 

DJ: So, it was money laundering, that they needed...

CAF: Yeah. Now, money laundering done behind the National Security Council is considered to be legal, OK? So, what I'm not saying is that it was illegal - in that sense. Everything the Deep State does is legal! (Hahaha!)

So, you're telling me that the that the man who built the big casinos in Atlantic City is an "outsider"? I don't think so!

DJ: Well, this is an excellent point you're making, here but we have a bit of a conundrum because, as you say Trump, to be such a big part of Atlantic City, he needed the Mafia and the intelligence connections to do that but the reason we have him looking in this scenario, like an outsider is recently, we had a major meeting of the Bilderberg Group and one of their big aims this year is to "Stop Trump". So, they look like they're definitely enlisting the media companies to do it, so that elite machine doesn't want him in there, apparently. 

Maybe they're afraid, that as one of them, he'll go "off the reservation" and expose their operations, you know. It's possible that could be the reason, as we've discussed. He's let some things out of the bag...

CAF: There's no way that Trump could be - I go back to the 'Kingsmen Campaign'. From what I could see, Trump and Clinton and Sanders, you know, within certain respects have entrainment. Because, you want to have a horse race. 

Remember, part of this is entertainment. So, there's no way Trump gets as far as he got without some kind of support, particularly from the media. Remember - you know, if you - I just did a book review on a book the by wonderful professor from MIT on the technology used in the online gaming and and machine gambling and it's very much entrainment technology. 

So, if you look at Trump's background, both in gambling and in Reality TV, he's like Mr. Entrainment!

DJ: Right.

CAF: OK, so there's no way he gets this far without some level of entrainment technology and and those kind of systems, right? 

DJ: Well, I wonder if he's convinced that he can play an even bigger game in the establishment for them. He's probably like a bull in a china shop and I recall in one of the debates, where he brought up the 9/11 Report with Jeb Bush and it was very uncomfortable and a real departure from the usual game and it seemed like he was at least defying the Republican Establishment - now, they can't be too happy about that! 

CAF: Here's one question and this is a question: One possibility is if you were basically the Deep State and you want to put Clinton in, as President, the question is how? Because, if you look at her negatives, her negatives are so significant.

DJ: Yes! 

CAF: You look at those negatives - as a political campaign manager - will look at somebody with those negatives and say. "It's impossible!"

DJ: Right.

CAF: The question is, how do you white-out the Republicans and put in someone who's so bad, that you could get Clinton in?

So, one of those possible scenarios is, how you white-out the Republicans and get Clinton in? That's one possibility. 

DJ: OK. 

CAF: The second possibility is you really do have a group of people who are going to support Donald Trump and get him in, just so that they can get in control. 

It's very interesting, I keep coming back to an interview with James Baker and in the end - let me see if I can find it on the Financial Times. Let me see if I can get it for you. 

DJ: Sure, definitely take a moment and find that for us and when we come back, we'll explore the more telltale signs of Deep State involvement in this Presidential Election and some of the bolder moves they may have in store for us before we reach November, even.

===

DJ: And we are back. This is Dark Journalist and I'm speaking with the former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and former Managing Director of Dillon, Read & Company, Catherine Austin Fitts.

This is a special two-part episode, so make sure you subscribe now, with that discount to get part two, next week. This is a powerful topic, we're dealing with; here the Endgame and how these transhumanist policies will play out. We're focusing on the political side here, in Part 1. 

Catherine, you were just about to dish out a very interesting quote from James Baker, the major Bush insider, regarding this election, do you have that ready? 

CAF: This is this is Baker quote: "Hillary Clinton was never given anything to do. She was just here, at the State Department to run for President. I won't get my panties in a wedge because of what I'm hearing from the political candidates. What they say in the campaign and what they do, once they're in the White House are not the same thing. 

"I don't care who wins, whoever gets into the White House. Presidents can do a lot but they can only do so much, in system of checks and balances. We're a country of laws, limited by bureaucracy and the power structure in Washington. Presidents are not unilateral rulers. If they do not know that, they will find out soon." 

Which I interpret Baker as saying is: "They'll do what we tell them to do!" (Hahaha!)

DJ: Yeah, exactly. 

CAF: Now, here's the problem. The Presidency of the United States is not an entry-level position. 

DJ: Yes.

CAF: ...Trump's not a guy - if you come from the private sector, where you can have a lot of control - Trump's not a guy who is used to dealing with the level of double binds you have...there are so many different circumstances, where you basically have to comfort, mollify, handle people - and that's not what he's good at - and so, if you look at the fact that he doesn't have the experience and background to handle a little, let alone, the temperament, I think that's the opposition.

Now, my expectation is if my first theory is correct, what you'll see is both of them lock-up the nomination and then Trump progressively loses more and more of the entrainment and support and other kind of support and then the Republicans get left fighting to hold the Senate and the House, which is going to be very difficult. 

DJ: Definitely. That's quite a scenario. Now, let's go into the Hillary campaign aspects for a moment, here. 

You do an excellent job of pointing out her jaded past in public life and her support of for-profit prisons and Monsanto. In fact, we have more than a few Monsanto honchos, right there in her campaign operation. 

One of our faves, out there Peggy Noonan and writing in the very mainstream Wall Street Journal wrote, "This campaign is coming down to a choice between crazy man and criminal." So we see cracks, even in that mainstream reporting, reflecting on Hillary and that corruption trail. 

On the other hand, in early June, we had her on the verge of losing to Bernie Sanders in California - and on the eve of the election, the AP news comes out of nowhere reports that she magically "clinched" the nomination, according to "inside sources" - and the New York Times followed suit; picks it up - and off we go. 

It depressed a voter turnout and of course, the media working there, behind the scenes to get her elected and they start announcing, "Hey she's the first woman nominee." So we're definitely seeing a media push for Hillary. What's going on there? 

CAF: Here's what's interesting if you look at what happened on a multi-prong level. It's when the Deep State moves to get something done, it's amazing to watch, in terms of an exercise of power. 

So, you have a friend of mine, who showed up at the polls at 7AM in a very wealthy San Francisco suburb and there were 12 people standing in front of them and four of them got bounced, and said they weren't registered. These were wealthy white Seniors - and they were given provisional ballots. 

DJ: Haha! That's unbelievable.

CAF: And the mailing list confirmed their polling place. Now, that is an extraordinary exercise in vote-rigging! 

You know, four Seniors in a wealthy neighborhood - presumably, people who've lived there for decades. When you can bounce them out, that's pretty amazing, Daniel. 

And you know what, then you have the T-money get bold - so for the first eight or nine days of the month, nobody gets their EBT money. You know, if they can't get their Food Stamps, they're scrambling to get money to buy food for the kids, they can't take the time to go vote. 

So, between the wealthy Seniors and people on Food Stamps, now you've got huge numbers - and God knows what was going on with the computer systems, behind the scenes.

So you've got the media doing AP, they got the EBT system doing what it's doing, you've got the vote-rigging in the computers doing what they're doing - and then, you've got the market suddenly - despite all the fundamentals - shooting up - and everything looks like it's "Morning in America". So, across multiple systems, you're suddenly seeing a whole series of things happen, which are designed to be bad for Sanders. 

DJ: Right.

CAF: Now, take a look at that. What that says to me is they're adamant that they want to get Clinton in. I can give my theories on why - but to me, it looked like the Deep State is pulling out all the stops, to make sure that Clinton is the candidate but they need to make it look like she won.

DJ: Uh-huh. 

CAF: I think the reason why Sanders has been allowed to do what he's doing is that they want to make it look like it's a horse race and to really make it look like she won something.

If you look at how the whole thing has unfolded, it's quite remarkable, because Sanders has not touched her own tough stuff and the interesting thing is that Trump has started to do some things -

DJ: Oh yeah - he's not gonna hold back, especially with strategists like Roger Stone around his campaign! We know Stone has written a book on all of the Clinton dirty criminal secrets but I do think that there's something interesting going on with this campaign because, she's also on a razor-thin edge; about being indicted. How do you think this is all going to play out? 

CAF: When it comes to Clinton, I want to focus you - because I want you to think in terms of putting yourself and in the position of the Deep State and looking at the world from their point of view.

One of the big money managers put it out a chart, a couple of months ago, it was "Chart of the Day" on MarketWatch, and it showed the GNP of all the women on the planet. The GNP of [women in] the United States, together added up was much bigger than the GNP of China or Asia. 

Basically, what it said was the "Soft Revolution" tactic of, "We're here to help women - you know (hahaha) - because we're always here to help, Daniel! We're here to help women and make sure you're going to have an equal footing! 

Now, I've watched for decades while, the minority card, the woman card is how you roll the local boys. So, you come into a local area disabled, "We bring equality to women and we bring equality to blacks and these white guys, you can't trust them because they take advantage - so trust us!" 

And it's been one of the most effective tactics for the guys centralizing things but I think now, they want to play it on an absolutely global scale and there's no doubt, they're moving a lot of women up into big positions and in government and business - having a woman as President - 

If you look at Obama, he make more money for the Deep State than any President in the history of the country.

DJ: Fascinating.

CAF: The bailout, Obamacare, Common Core - the guy has absolutely delivered to the Deep State - things that no Bush could ever get for them so I think they think the African-American card worked really well and then they want to double down with women - and they don't care how much the women in America hate Hillary! This is a global play. They're playing for the global consumer market and global political control and they're looking to roll the Muslims and looking to roll anybody with conservative religious values and this is the way to do it.

This is the soft revolution and basically, Hillary's going to do it. They don't think of Hillary as somebody who has any particular great talents, they just think of Hillary as somebody who will say and do what they tell her to do - AND she wants to die a billionaire! 

So, "Do what we say and you'll end up a billionaire and just shut up and do what we say!" And all they need is a female. They don't really care if the female can do anything. It's what Baker said, "We didn't give her anything to do, she was just running for President." (Hahaha!)

DJ: That sounds dangerously close to the truth!

CAF: Have you been watching 'House of Cards"? 

DJ: Once in a while.

CAF: I think the Netflix guys - you know, if you look at the Robin Wright character, it's basically a First Lady who will do anything to become President, whether she's qualified or not. I mean, the synergies are so remarkable. Anyway, here's the question: so, the Deep State is vested on having a woman President for strategic, business and political issues, that if you look at things from their point of view makes total sense. Their problem is, "How are we going to get through the election without having a discussion on what the American establishment has really been up to?" 

The interesting thing is if Donald Trump decides to have a serious discussion about what the American establishment has been up to, it's going to get very interesting.  

DJ: Yeah, that's the wild card.

CAF: Will the Deep State allow that? 

DJ: Good point!

CAF: Will the Deep State allow a discussion of Mena, Arkansas and what really went on in Benghazi and what Bill has really been doing with Jeffrey Epstein (hahaha!)

DJ: Yes, that's right - and the Clinton Foundation and the massive payoffs they've been taking in, there. It does seem like, if they get in again, it will be more corrupt than ever. They really seem to stretch the limits of how much in-your-face criminality the public can handle. 

CAF: Here's the interesting thing - here's the interesting question, one example: the world's greatest hypocrite is not Hillary Clinton; the world's greatest hypocrite is Alan Greenspan. 

So, Alan Greenspan comes out with the speech saying, "Productivity in America has flatlined and if we have flatlined productivity the world's headed for a disaster." 

So, "Alan, why would we have flat productivity? What did everything you do have to do with it?" You know? Talk about hypocrisy! But he tried. Productivity has flatlined. If you spend all day dealing with your autistic kid, you can't be very productive. 

DJ: Right.

CAF: The question is, with the debt growth model. We've covered up - as productivity has declined - was just thrown more debt at the problem, more debt at the problem - and that's kept the liquidity going. But now that you can't continue to do that, the question is how to get productivity up?

Now, here's the problem: the message of the Clinton Presidency will be, "Crime pays." (Hahaha!) 

DJ: Right.

CAF: That's the message. "Crime pays." And if that is the message to every person in the G7 Nations, then what you're going to get are people who assume. "OK, the economy's criminal, the leadership is criminal. Crime pays. I'll just be a criminal - or I'll just shut down and avoid criminals." 

There are different coping mechanisms but the reality is, you're absolutely saying you can't have faith in the system, because crime pays. 

DJ: Well, this is intriguing because, if the Deep State wants to play the woman card, they want to get these hardcore policies through under the cover of using the soft, fluffy female empowerment cover-sheen, all over everything, knowing what a real militaristic hawk that Hillary is, this is going to be the ultimate makeover?

CAF: Right. If you look at the Clinton Foundation, it's remarkable. If you read what they're doing in Haiti. So basically, they're raising billions of dollars and then they're going and having a wedding for Chelsea, where the cake cost $25,000 and in the meantime, people in Haiti are starving to death because none of that money gets through.

DJ: Huh.

CAF: you know and but they're publishing all sorts of pictures of helping Haiti and it's all very fluffy, so the the people who show up at the wedding feel like "insiders" and they get lots of money through the Clinton Foundation. 

So, they're all happy and you know and the fluffy pictures go out, the Soft Revolution is successful and the US looks like it's helping Haiti and you know, all the guys are getting the mining contracts for the gold and in Haiti - they're happy and the American people can feel happy because, "We're helping," right? We're good people. So, all the cash flows work, you just have to pretend that what's going on in Haiti isn't happening.

DJ: Wow, that disaster capitalism - they're just great at it!

CAF: Right. They are! 

DJ: Absolutely just amazing.

Well, we'll wrap-up Part 1, here but in Part 2, we'll go deep on this Transhumanist Agenda, driving everything, from Common Core to this AI takeover that they're working on. Part 2 will be up for subscribers next week, at darkjournalist.com.

This is the right time to subscribe and that helps the show out, a lot so, Catherine's new report is "Where to Stash the Cash in 2016". 

Catherine, thank you and let's get ready here for Part 2.

CAF: It's been great being on, Danny.

DJ: Well, it's great to have you here! 

Thank you for joining me for this fascinating episode with former Assistant Housing Secretary, Catherine Austin Fitts on the Elite Endgame and the Transhumanist Agenda.

Video: (49 mins):

Catherine Austin Fitts: Elite Endgame, the Transhumanist Agenda and 2016 Political Race

http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/catherine-austin-fitts-transhumanist-endgame-in-2016-political-race-27733