Rand Corp: how to destroy Russia
by Manlio Dinucci
00
Force the adversary to expand recklessly in order to unbalance him, and
then destroy him. This is not the description of a judo hold, but a plan
against Russia elaborated by the Rand Corporation, the most influential think
tank in the USA. With a staff of thousands of experts, Rand presents itself
as the world's most reliable source for Intelligence and political analysis for
the leaders of the United States and their allies.
The Rand Corp prides itself on having contributed to the elaboration of
the long-term strategy which enabled the United States to win the Cold War, by
forcing the Soviet Union to consume its own economic resources in the strategic
confrontation. It is this model which was the inspiration for the new plan, Overextending and Unbalancing Russia,
published by Rand [1]. According to their
analysts, Russia remains a powerful adversary for the United States in certain
fundamental sectors. To handle this opposition, the USA and their allies will
have to pursue a joint long-term strategy which exploits Russia's
vulnerabilities. So Rand analyses the various means with which to unbalance
Russia, indicating for each the probabilities of success, the benefits, the
cost, and the risks for the USA.
Rand analysts estimate that Russia's greatest vulnerability is that of
its economy, due to its heavy dependency on oil and gas exports. The income
from these exports can be reduced by strengthening
sanctions and increasing the energy exports of the United States. The goal
is to oblige Europe to diminish its importation of Russian natural gas, and
replace it by liquefied natural gas transported by sea from other countries.
Another way of destabilising the Russian economy in the long run is to encourage the emigration of qualified
personnel, particularly young Russians with a high level of education.
In the ideological and information sectors, it would be necessary to encourage internal contestation and at the same time, to undermine Russia's image on the exterior, by excluding it from international forums and boycotting the international sporting events that it organises.
In the ideological and information sectors, it would be necessary to encourage internal contestation and at the same time, to undermine Russia's image on the exterior, by excluding it from international forums and boycotting the international sporting events that it organises.
In the geopolitical sector, arming
Ukraine would enable the USA to exploit the central point of Russia's exterior
vulnerability, but this would have to be carefully calculated in order to
hold Russia under pressure without slipping into a major conflict, which it
would win.
In the military sector, the USA could enjoy high benefits, with low
costs and risks, by increasing the number
of land-based troops from the NATO countries working in an anti-Russian
function.
The USA can enjoy high probabilities of success and high benefits, with
moderate risks, especially by investing
mainly in strategic bombers and long-range attack missiles directed against
Russia.
Leaving the INF Treaty and deploying in
Europe new intermediate-range nuclear missiles pointed at Russia
would lead to high probabilities of success, but would also present high risks.
By calibrating each option to gain the desired effect - conclude the
Rand analysts - Russia would end up by paying the hardest price in a
confrontation, but the USA would also have to invest huge resources, which would therefore no longer be
available for other objectives. This is also prior warning of a coming major
increase in USA/NATO military spending, to the disadvantage of social budgets.
This is the future that is planned out for us by the Rand Corporation,
the most influential think tank of the Deep State - in other words the
underground centre of real power gripped by the economic, financial, and
military oligarchies – which determines the strategic choices not only of the
USA, but all of the Western world.
The « options » set out by the plan
are in reality no more than variants of the same war strategy, of which the
price in sacrifices and risks is paid by us all.
Il manifesto, 21 May 2019
Translator: Pete Kimberley
[1] Overextending and Unbalancing Russia. Assessing the Impact of Cost-Imposing Options, by James Dobbins, Raphael S. Cohen, Nathan Chandler, Bryan Frederick, Edward Geist, Paul DeLuca, Forrest E. Morgan, Howard J. Shatz, Brent Williams, Rand Corporation, May 2019.
«DICHIARAZIONE DI FIRENZE»
Per la creazione di un fronte internazionale NATO EXIT in tutti i paesi europei della NATO
DANSK DEUTSCH ENGLISH ESPAÑOL FRANÇAIS ITALIANO NEDERLANDS
PORTUGUÊS ROMÎNA SLOVENSKÝ SVENSKA TÜRKÇE РУССКИЙ СРПСКИ
PORTUGUÊS ROMÎNA SLOVENSKÝ SVENSKA TÜRKÇE РУССКИЙ СРПСКИ
No comments:
Post a Comment