Washington Reaches New Heights of Insanity with the “Kremlin Report”
Washington Reaches New Heights of Insanity with the “Kremlin Report”
Paul Craig Roberts
In an act of insane escalation of provocations against Russia, Washington
has produced a list of 210 top Russian government officials and important
business executives who are “gangsters,” “members of Putin’s gang,” “threats,”
“people deserving to be sanctioned,” or however the Western presstitutes care
to explain the list. The absurd list includes the Prime Minister of Russia, the
Foreign Minister, the Defense Minister, and executives of Gazprom, Rosneft, and
Bank Rossiya. In other words, the suggestion is that the entirety of Russian
political and business leadership is corrupt.
The Russians do not seem to understand the purpose of the list.
Presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that the government sees the list as
an attempt to interfere in the Russian presidential election. There is no doubt
that Washington would like to reduce Putin’s public support so that Washington
can use the Western-funded NGOs operating in Russia to present American stooges
as Russia’s true voices. However, it is unlikely that the Russian people are
stupid enough to fall for such a trick.
Washington’s list has three purposes:
1) To undercut Russian diplomacy by presenting the top echelons of Russia
as gangsters.
2) To present Russia as a military threat as per the ridiculous announcement by British defense minister Gavin Williamson on January 26 that Russia intends to rip British “infrastructure apart, actually cause thousands and thousands and thousands of deaths,” and create “total chaos within the country.”
3) To shift American and European attention away from the coming release of the House Intelligence Committee’s report that proves Russiagate is a conspiracy between the FBI, the Obama Department of Justice and the Democratic National Committee against President Trump. Washington’s Russian list will give the presstitutes something else to talk about instead of the act of treason committed against the President of the United States. Expect to hear nothing from the presstitutes except that the House Intelligence Committee report is only a political effort to shield Trump from accountability.
There is likely a fourth reason for the list. Israel wants Washington’s
pressure on Russia, because Russia has so far prevented Israel’s use of the US
military to create the same chaos in Syria and Iran as has been created in Iraq
and Libya. Israel wants Syria and Iran destabilized because they support
Hezbollah, which prevents Israel from occupying the water resources of southern
Lebanon. The Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, which
requires the list, passed the House and Senate by a vote of 517-5. Normally,
such unanimous foreign policy votes are associated with demands from the Israel
Lobby.
The Russian government and the Russian people need to understand that Washington considers Russia to be a threat because Russia is not under Washington’s thumb. The Zionist neoconservatives control US foreign policy. Their ideology is world hegemony. They do not use diplomacy. They rely on disinformation, threats, and violence. Therefore, there is no American diplomacy with which Putin and Lavrov can engage.
The Russian government and the Russian people need to understand that Washington considers Russia to be a threat because Russia is not under Washington’s thumb. The Zionist neoconservatives control US foreign policy. Their ideology is world hegemony. They do not use diplomacy. They rely on disinformation, threats, and violence. Therefore, there is no American diplomacy with which Putin and Lavrov can engage.
Putin, being a responsible political leader of a great power, does not
respond to provocation with provocation. He ignores the insults and continues
to wait for the West to come to its senses. But what if the West does not come
to its senses?
For the West to come to its senses requires the complete overthrow of the
Zionist neoconservatives and/or the breakup of NATO.
The overthrow of the
neoconservatives would require a rival foreign policy voice, and that voice is
very weak as it is shut off from the media, the think tanks, and the
universities. The breakup of NATO would require European political figures to
give up their Washington subsidies and the career advancement that Washington
provides.
As I write the Atlantic Council is holding a members and press call in
for a discussion with Atlantic Council members Amb. Daniel Fried and Anders
Aslund. The Atlantic Council is a neoconservative propaganda agency. The
purpose of the “discussion” is to further undermine US-Russian relations.
The Russian government faces a difficult situation. The foreign policy of
the US, and thereby of the Western world, is controlled by neoconservatives who
are determined to present Russia in the most threatening light. Russian
diplomacy can do nothing to change this. The non-provocative and responsible
Russian response has the effect of encouraging more provocations from
Washington. At some point Russian passivity might convince the neoconservatives
that they can successfully attack Russia. Alternatively, the continual
provocations might convince Russia that the country is targeted for attack,
thereby causing a Russian pre-emptive action.
Everyone in the world should realize the threat of nuclear war that is
inherent in Washington’s policy toward Russia, and everyone in the world
should understand that the only threat that Russia poses is to Washington’s
unilateralism.
No comments:
Post a Comment