ERIC ZUESSE |
08.01.2017 | WORLD
US Aristocracy Panics that Maybe Trump Is Serious
On January 2nd, the U.S. Republican Party’s Wall
Street Journal headlined «Tensions
Within GOP Rise Over How to Handle Russia», and reported
that the policy toward Russia by the incoming Republican President Donald Trump
is being opposed not only by Democrats in the U.S. Congress, but also by some
Republicans, and perhaps even by enough Republicans to jeopardize confirmation
of his nominee for U.S. Secretary of State, as well as some nominees for other
crucial diplomatic and military positions.
A key insightful passage in that news-report was: «‘What you are
seeing on Russia within the Republican Party is in some ways more a symptom of
realignment across the board within American political parties,’ said Matthew
Rojansky, director of the Washington-based Kennan Institute. ‘This speaks to
something very critical that’s going on in our political system right now.’»
Trump is being significantly opposed by both Parties regarding his
foreign policies, even though his domestic policies are being opposed on a far
more partisan basis, by Democrats, and have a higher chance of congressional
passage than his international initiatives do, because of the almost-solid
support for his domestic policies on the part of Republican members of Congress
— and because Republicans control both the Senate and the House.
The «realignment across the board within American political parties» is
actually a realignment only in the field of foreign policy — not at
all in domestic policy. What used to be «Republican foreign policy» ever since
the time of Richard Nixon, has been called «neoconservatism» — referring to a
hard line against communism and then against Russia and any country that’s
friendly toward Russia — but the incoming Republican President Trump campaigned
consistently against neoconservatism, and now Democrats are almost
solidly neocons, while some Republicans are actually joining the
Republican President in condemning neocons.
Whereas Trump is generally called «conservative» on his domestic policy
statements, he could possibly turn out to be more of a «progressive» than his
Democratic Party predecessor, President Barack Obama, was, regarding foreign
affairs. And this terrifies the U.S. aristocracy in both of the political
Parties, because the U.S. aristocracy — both its Republicans and its Democrats
— has been solidly neoconservative: they
are virtually united, on this, against Trump.
The U.S. aristocracy control not only the major American corporations,
but all influential ‘news’ media, and their respective ‘news’media; and their
shared fear and loathing for incoming U.S. President Donald Trump is clear,
even though he himself is one of them. Nobody knows what will happen to the
U.S. government under his stewardship, but the fear amongst almost all of the
other aristocrats is that maybe Trump hasn’t only been pretending to
want a ‘populist’ government — they fear that he might really have such
revolutionary intentions. They are consequently afraid: might it
really be the case that a revolution — especially one transforming
America’s foreign policies, which are the policies that are of
the greatest interest to aristocrats (more even than domestic policies are) —
will be led by a member of their own class? Is the ruling class —
the thousand or so of them in the U.S. — perhaps now splitting, in a way that
is far more meaningful than the merely superficial (rhetorical) distinctions
that still remain between America’s two major political Parties, the
Republicans and the Democrats?
The old ideological political alliances within the United States have
now utterly broken down, and the reason is that in recent decades, both the
right and the left had been controlled behind the scenes, by America’s billionaires
and centi-millionaires, who are virtually unanimous on some policy-issues (so
that the U.S. has a one-party government on these matters), with no significant
ideological dissent amongst the U.S. aristocracy on those key issues,
especially about continuing the old ideological Cold War
against communism, switched now into a purely nationalistic and
increasingly hot war against Russia, as allegedly an evil and
imperialistic nation in ways that the United States itself is supposedly not
(but actually is even more so than Russia or any other nation in the
world, and widely
recognized as such, except inside the United States itself, where
the aristocracy’s ‘news’ media hide this ugly nationalistic fact about the
land they control —
the fact of America’s being the world’s most aggressive nation).
America’s super-rich have no objection against the government that they
control conquering others, like the Iraq-invasion in 2003, and the U.S. coup overthrowing and
replacing the democratically elected and Moscow-friendly President of that
country in 2014, and aiding jihadists in Syria to overthrow Syria’s
pro-Russian secular government; and the phone-tapping of all Western leaders
including Angela Merkel and generally practicing cyber-invasions everywhere in
the world — but they and their agents allege that Russia is doing these things
even worse than America is, and needs to be punished by the ‘virtuous’ U.S.
government for (allegedly) doing what the U.S. actually does far more
than any other nation in the world.
Though Trump has reversed himself on many things that threaten the U.S.
aristocracy, such as by his saying he won’t, after all, prosecute Hillary
Clinton for her crimes (which were never really investigated under Obama’s
regime — and protecting the legal immunity of aristocrats is crucial to the
aristocracy of both political Parties), Trump still hasn’t — now just
days before entering the White House — reversed himself regarding his
intention to improve relations with Russia.
Becoming even more hostile toward Russia is almost a unanimous goal of
the U.S. aristocracy. They’re thus rebelling against him, in their ‘news’media,
and they won’t stop trying to cripple his Presidency unless and until he
relents on this, turns around, and continues, ever-hotter than before, their
(under Obama, increasing) ’Cold War’ against Russia: going beyond even what
President Obama has been doing (coups, invasions, sanctions, etc.), aiming to
replace the Russian government’s allies by the American government’s allies,
and thus to isolate and weaken Russia, ultimately to take over Russia itself.
During the early years of the Cold War, America’s Republican Party
and their ‘news’ media, especially insisted upon increasing the war against
the Soviet Union; but, now, in the purely nationalistic war against Russia,
it’s instead Democratic Party politicians and ‘news’ media, who are
especially fervid to conquer Russia. Republican Party ‘news’ media, such as Fox
‘News’, are now considerably less hateful toward Russia, no longer obsessed
against it, like the Democratic Party’s ‘news’ media have become — thereby
switching political roles.
Consequently, too, for example, the Democratic Party’s Washington
Post is doing everything they can to encourage U.S. conquest of
Russia, such as by spreading fake ‘news’ stories against the few small
independent Western newsmedia that are pointing out the lies (especially the
ones against Russia) in such media-giants; and some of the Republican Party’s ‘news’media
now are even doing in-depth actual news-reporting about the fraudulence of the
Democratic Party’s ‘news’media, on these matters that are of such intense
interest to America’s aristocrats.
Excellent examples of this phenomenon are provided by the various
‘news’media of the rightwing-populist Alex Jones, which featured, on New Year’s
Day, the video «Dems Want War
With Russia To Stop Trump», and an associated investigative
news report from their Mikael Thalen, «Washington
Post Stirs Fear After False Report of Power Grid Hack by Russia»,
exposing the WP’s lying propaganda for «War With Russia» — Democrats’ (and
a few Republicans’) lies basically to promote unsubstantiated allegations by
the Obama regime, that ‘Russian hacking’ is a danger both to American
‘democracy’, and to American national security.
That «War With Russia» video (at 5:00-) presents the futurist, Gerald
Celente, discussing liberal Democrats who were saying, totally without
evidence, such things as »Vermonters
and all Americans should be both alarmed and outraged that one of the world’s
leading thugs, Vladimir Putin, has been attempting to hack our electric grid,
which we rely upon to support our quality of life, economy, health, and
safety.» The infamous 1950s Republican, Joseph R. McCarthy, has thus
non-ideologically returned from the grave, now, in the guise of liberal
Democrats (or should that instead be ‘Democrats’?), as part of the U.S. aristocracy’s
war to force the Republican President, Donald Trump, to join the tradition
that the Republican President George Herbert Walker Bush established, on 24
February 1990, of treating Russia as being America’s enemy, no
longer communism as being America’s enemy.
These people simply can’t draw enough of other people’s
blood. Bram Stoker might
be shocked that reality has thus produced ghouls who would
make Stoker’s own legendary vampires seem like angels by comparison. Will Trump
perform the role of Stoker’s hero, Abraham van
Helsing here, or instead become just another of the vampires
himself (which all of America’s major, and most of its minor, ‘news’media are
demanding)?
No comments:
Post a Comment