President Obama: The Race for the Imperial
Legacy
04.29.2016 :: United States
Only the rankest gang of corrupt media pundits in the US media can pretend this gangster President should evade a war crimes tribunal.
Introduction:
President Obama is racing forward
to establish his imperial legacy throughout Russia, Asia and Latin America. In
the last two years he has accelerated the buildup of his military nuclear
arsenal on the frontiers of Russia. The Pentagon has designed a high tech
anti-missile system to undermine Russian defenses.
In Latin America, Obama has shed his shallow
pretense of tolerating the center–left electoral regimes. Instead he is has
joined with rabid authoritarian neo-liberals in Argentina; met with the judges
and politicians engineering the overthrow of the current Brazilian government;
and encouraged the emerging far-rightwing regimes in Peru under Keiko Fujimori
and Colombia under President Santos.
In Asia, Obama has clearly escalated a military
build-up threatening China’s principle waterways in the South China Sea. Obama
encouraged aggressive and violent separatist groupings in Hong Kong, Tibet,
Xinjian and Taiwan. Obama invites Beijing billionaires to relocate a trillion
dollars in assets to the ‘laundry machines’ of North America, Europe and Asia.
Meanwhile he has actively blocked China’s long-planned commercial ’silk route’
across Myanmar and west Asia.
In the Middle East, President Obama joined with
Saudi Arabia as Riyadh escalated its brutal war and blockade in Yemen. He
directed Kenya and other African predator states to attack Somalia. He has
continued to back mercenary armies invading Syria while collaborating with the
Turkish dictator, Erdogan, as Turkish troops bomb Kurdish, Syrian and Iraqi
fighters who are engaged on the front lines against Islamist terrorism.
President Obama and his minions have
consistently groveled before the Jewish State and its US Fifth Column,
massively increasing US ‘tribute’ to Tel Aviv. Meanwhile, Israel continues to
seize thousands of acres of Palestinian land murdering and arresting thousands
of Palestinians, from young children to aged grandparents.
The Obama regime is desperate to overcome the
consequences of his political, military and economic failures of the past six
years and establish the US as the uncontested global economic and military
power.
At this stage, Obama’s supreme goal is to leave
an enduring legacy, where he will have: (1) surrounded and weakened Russia and
China; (2) re-converted Latin America into an authoritarian free-trade backyard
for US plunder; (3) turned the Middle East and North Africa into a bloody
playpen for Arab and Jewish dictators bent on brutalizing whole nations and
turning millions into refugees to flood Europe and elsewhere.
Once this ‘legacy’ is established, our
‘Historic Black President’ can boast that he has dragged our ‘great nation’
into more wars for longer periods of time, costing more diverse human lives and
creating more desperate refugees than any previous US President, all the while
polarizing and impoverishing the great mass of working Americans. He will,
indeed, set a ‘high bar’ for his incumbent replacement, Madame Hilary Clinton
to leap over and even expand.
To examine the promise of an Obama legacy and
avoid premature judgements, it is best to briefly recall the failures of his
first 6 years and reflect on his current inspired quest for a ‘place in
history’.
Fear, Loathing and Retreat
Obama’s shameless bailout of Wall Street
contrasted sharply with the desires and sentiments of the vast majority of
Americans who had elected him. This was a historic moment of great fear and
loathing where scores of millions of Americans demanded the federal government
reign in the financial criminals, stop the downward spiral of household
bankruptcies and home foreclosures and recovery America’s working economy.
After a brief honeymoon following his ‘historic election’, the ‘historic’ President
Obama turned his back on the wishes of the people and transferred trillions of
public money to ‘bailout’ the banks and financial centers on Wall Street.
Not satisfied with betraying the American
workers and the beleaguered middle class, Obama reneged on his campaign
promises to end the war(s) in the Middle East by increasing the US troop
presence and expanding his drone-assassination warfare against Afghanistan,
Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Somalia and Syria.
US troops re-invaded Afghanistan, fought and
retreated in defeat. The Taliban advanced. The US expanded its training of the
puppet Iraqi army, which collapsed on its first encounters with the Islamic
State. Washington retreated again. Regime change in Libya, Egypt and Somalia
created predator-mercenary states without any semblance of US control and
dominance.
Obama had become both a master of military
defeats and financial swindles.
In the Western Hemisphere, a continent of
independent Latin American governments had emerged to challenge US supremacy.
The ‘Historic President’ Obama was dismissed as a clueless hack of the US
Empire who lacked any rapport with governments south of the Panama Canal. While
trade and investment flourished between Latin America and Asia; Washington fell
behind. Regional political and economic agreements expanded, but Obama was left
without allies.
Obama’s clumsy attempts at US-backed ‘regime
change’ were defeated in Venezuela and elsewhere. Only the small, corrupt
narco-state of Honduras fell into Obama’s orbit with the Hillary Clinton-engineered
overthrow of its elected populist-nationalist president.
China and Russia expanded and flourished as
commodities boomed, wealth expanded and demand for Chinese manufacturers
exploded.
By 2013 Obama had no legacy.
The Recovery: Obama’s Lost Legacy
Obama began the road to establishing his
‘legacy’ with the US-financed coup in Ukraine, spearheaded by the first bona
fide Nazi militia since WWII. After celebrating the violent ‘regime change’
against Ukraine’s elected government, Obama’s new oligarch-puppet regime and
its ethno-nationalist army have been a disaster, losing control of the
industrialized Donbas region to ethnic Russian rebels and completely losing the
strategic Crimea when the population overwhelmingly voted to re-join Russia
after 50 years. Meanwhile, the oligarch-’president’ Poroshenko and his fellow
puppets have pilfered several billion dollars in ‘aid’ from the EU…all in
pursuit of the Obama legacy’.
Obama then slapped devastating economic
sanctions against Russia for its role in the Crimean referendum and its support
for the millions of Russian speakers in Donbas, and in the process forced the
European Union to make major trade sacrifices. For their role in creating a
real “American legacy” for Mr. Obama, the Germans, French and the other
twenty-eight countries have sacrificed billions of Euros in trade and
investments - alienating large sectors of their own agricultural and
manufacturing economy.
The Obama regime placed nuclear weapons on the
Polish border with Russia, pointed at the Russian heartland. Estonians,
Lithuanians and Latvians joined Obama’s military exercises stationing US ships
and attack aircraft in the Baltic Sea threatening Russia’s security.
Obama’s Legacy in Latin America
The Obama regime intensified its efforts to re-establish
supremacy with the demise of the center-left regimes following elections in
late 2013 to the present.
Obama’s ‘legacy’ in Latin America is based on
the return to power of neo-liberal elites in the region. Their successful
elections were the result of several factors, including: (1) the rise of
rightwing economic power in Latin America; (2) the decay and corruption of
political power within the Left; 3) incapacity of the Left to develop its own
independent mass media to challenge the media monopoly of the right; and (4)
the failure of center-left regimes to diversify their economy and develop
growth outside the boundaries defined by the dominant capitalist sectors.
The Obama regime worked closely with the
political-business elite, organizing the political campaigns and controlling
key economic policies even during the center-Left governments. The Left regimes
had financed, subsidized and rewarded right-wing business interests in
agro-mineral industries, banking, and the media as well as in manufacturing and
imports.
As long as worldwide demand for primary
materials was strong, the Center-Left governments had plenty of room to adjust
their social spending for workers while accommodating business interests. When
demand and prices fell, budget deficits forced the Center-Left to cut back on
social spending for the masses as well as subsidies for the business elite. In
response, the business sector organized a full-scale attack on the government -
in defense of elite power. The Center-Left failed to counter the growing power
and position of their business elite adversaries.
The business elite launched a full-scale
propaganda war via its captive mass media - focusing on real or imagined
corruption scandals discrediting Center-Left politicians. The Left lacked its
own effective mass media to answer the Right’s accusations, having failed to
democratize the corporate media monopolies.
The Center-Left parties adopted the elite’s
technique of financing political campaigns - namely, through bribes, contract
concessions, patronage other deal making with billionaire private and state
contractors. The center-Left imagined it could compete with the free-market
rightwing in financing campaigns and candidates via swindlers - and not through
class struggle. This was a game they could never master.
The Right, however, mobilized their allies
within police, judicial and public institutions to prosecute and disqualify the
Center-Left for committing the same crimes the Right had evaded.
The Center-Left did not mobilize the workers
and employees to establish even minimal controls over the elite and assume some
managerial power. They thought they could compete with the Right on its own
terms, through shady business and chicanery.
The Center-Left relied on financing its
administration and policies through the commodity boom in demand for its
natural resources - overlooking the fundamental instability and volatility of
the global commodity market. While the Right openly condemned the ‘weakness of
the Center-Left’ - in private, it pursued policies even more dependent on
overseas speculators and narrow elites.
In Argentina, as the economy declined, the
leadership of the rightwing, led by Mauricio Marci, launched a successful
presidential campaign involving the mass media, banks, middle class voters and
agro-mining elites. Immediately upon taking power, the Macri regime cut social
services for workers and the lower middle class, slashing their living
standards and lay off thousands of government employees. Obama saw Macri as his
kind of legacy savior and viewed Argentina as the new center of US power in
Latin America - with plans for more regime change in Brazil, Venezuela and
throughout the region.
In Brazil, the Center-Left Workers’ Party (PT)
faced a massive attack on its power base by the extreme rightwing parties.
Corruption scandals rocked the entire spectrum of the political class, but the
PT was most heavily implicated by massive fraud in Brazil’s huge national oil
company, Petrobras. The PT regime’s troubles intensified as the country entered
a recession with the drop in demand for its agro-mining exports. Growing fiscal
deficits compounded the regime’s problems. The Brazilian hard Right mobilized
its entire apparatus of elite power - the courts, judges, police and
intelligence agencies - in a bid to overthrow the PT government and impose an
authoritarian neo-liberal regime seizing all financial, business and productive
assets.
The Center-Left had never been very left, if at
all. Under Presidents Lula and Rousseff (2003-2016), the powerful mining and
agricultural elites flourished; banking, investment and multi-national
enterprises prospered. The Center-Left made some paternalistic concessions to
the lowest income classes, and increased wages for labor and farm workers. But
the PT relegated labor to the background while it signed business agreements
and granted tax concessions to capital. It failed to engage Brazilian workers
in class struggle.
The Right was never engaged in any struggle
with a genuine leftist government pressing business for structural changes.
Nevertheless, the Right sought to eliminates even the most superficial reforms.
It would accept nothing short of total control, including: the privatization of
the major national oil company, the reduction of wages, pensions and transport
subsidies and a slashing of social programs. The Brazilian Rightwing coup - a
fake impeachment organized by indicted crooks - is designed to vastly
re-concentrate wealth, and re-establish the power of business, while plunging
millions into poverty and repressing the principal organized mass movements. In
Brazil, the elite-controlled media, courts and politicians act as judge, jury
and jailers - against a center-left regime which had never taken control over
the major institutions of elite power.
Obama and the Axis of his Legacy
Political rightists join police to control the
multitudes and seize power, re-establishing deep ties among Brazil, Washington
and Argentina. They will then move toward the neo-liberal re-conquest of all
Latin America. Against this new wave, it must be understood that Obama’s Latin
American legacy is too recent, too hasty and too disjointed - the new Right
exhibits the same or even worse features of the recently deceased Left.
Argentina’s Marci borrows $15 billion at 8%
interest, when the economy is fracturing, employment is collapsing, exports and
worldwide demand is declining. At the same time, President Mauricio Marci’s
cabinet is plagued by major financial scandals ‘a la Panama Papers’. The entire
political party-trade union-employed working class is profoundly disenchanted
with Marci’s minority rule.
Argentina may not turn out to be Obama’s
enduring Latin Legacy: While Macri may open the door for a brief Washington
take-over, the results will be catastrophic and the future, given Argentina’s
recent history of popular street uprisings, is uncertain.
Likewise in Brazil, the impeachment/coup will
result in new and more numerous investigations with trials of post-impeachment
politicians and a deepening economic crisis. Brazil’s Vice-President, who
turned against Rouseff, now faces corruption charges, as do his supporters. The
prolonged confrontation precludes any basic continuity. The rightwing regime’s
policy of slashing wages, pensions and poverty ‘baskets’ will detonate
large-scale confrontations with the polarized population. Obama’s ‘legacy’ will
be a brief episode - celebrating the ouster of the Workers’ Party President
followed by a long period of instability and disorder.
Rightist regimes in Venezuela, Colombia and
Peru will be part of Obama’s ‘legacy’ but to what lasting end?
The Venezuelan rightwing congress - dubbed the
MUD - seeks to overthrow the elected president. It demands the release of
several right-wing assassins from prison, the privatization of the oil
industry, and a deep cut in social programs (health and education). They would
reduce employees’ wages and eliminate food subsidies. The MUD has no competent
plan or capacity to grow the oil economy and overcome chronic food shortages.
The MUD would merely replace the Left’s subsidized economy with massive price
increases for basic commodities — reducing domestic consumption to a fraction
of its current level. In other words, the right-wing offensive may defeat the
Chavista left but it will not stabilize Venezuela or develop a viable
neo-liberal alternative. Any new rightwing regime will deteriorate rapidly and
the chronic problem of criminal violence will exceed the current levels. The
alliance between Washington and Venezuela’s far right will hardly support
Obama’s claim to a historic legacy. More likely, it will serve as another
example of a failed right wing state unable to replace a weakening left regime.
Similar circumstances can be found among other
‘emerging’ rightist regimes.
In Colombia, the current rightwing President
Santos talks to the FARC guerrillas, but also accommodates the paramilitary
death squads. His talks of peace settlements and social reform are linked to
the genocidal right, led by the former President Uribe. Meanwhile, the economy
stagnates with oil and metal prices collapsing on the world market. Colombian
living standards have declined and the promise of a rightwing revival grows
dim. The US-Colombian alliance may undercut the FARC but the rightwing does not
offer any prospect for modernizing the economy or stabilizing the society.
Similarly in Peru, the rightwing wins votes and
embraces free markets, but growth declines, investments and profits dry up and
mass disenchantment grows among the poor promising street conflicts.
The Obama ‘legacy’ in Latin America has
followed a series of brutal victories, which have no capacity to re-impose a
stable ‘new order’ of free markets and free elections. The initial wave of
favorable investments and lucrative concessions will fail to revive and
recalibrate a new growth dynamics.
More ominously, Obama relied on mass murder to
replace an elected leftist-nationalist president in Honduras and imposed a
regime of terror against the poor and indigenous population. Meanwhile, illicit
offshore handouts reward speculators in Argentina.
Obama’s legacy in Latin America reflects an
entire spectrum from illicit-rightwing coups to oust the elected governments in
Brazil and Venezuela, to elected authoritarian presidents in Peru and Colombia
with historic links to death squads and multi-million dollar overseas accounts.
Obama’s contemporary ‘Latin American legacy’
reeks of gross electoral manipulation preparing the ground for bloody class
wars.
Obama’s Legacy in the Ukraine, Yemen and Syria
The Obama regime thought it could manage
widespread conflicts, uprisings and wars to advance its global supremacy.
To that end, Obama spent billions of dollars in
weapons and propaganda arming Neo-Nazi para-military troops to seize power in
Ukraine. A grotesque, brutal gang of oligarchs (and disgraced, foreign
fugitives - like the ousted Georgian leader, Mikhail Saakashvili) served
Washington in the puppet Kiev regime. Critics, journalists, jurists and
citizens are being assassinated. The economy has collapsed; prices skyrocket;
incomes declined by half; unemployment tripled and millions have sought refuge
abroad. Wars raged between Russian ethnic citizen armies in the Donbas and the
puppet Kiev regime. The people of Crimea voted to rejoin Russia. Meanwhile,
economic sanctions against trade with Russia have exacerbated shortages for the
people of Ukraine.
Under Obama’s stewardship the Ukraine became a
world-class… basket case: so much for his European legacy. He can rightly claim
credit for imposing a thoroughly retrograde regime of Klepto-capitalism with no
redeeming feature.
Obama embraced Saudi Arabia’s war against Yemen
- destroying the life and cities of the poorest nation in the Middle East.
Obama’s ‘legacy’ in Yemen stands for the systematic obliteration of a sovereign
people: Obama performs his tricks for billionaire Saudi despots while savaging
the innocent. To the Israelis in Palestine and the Saudis in Yemen, Obama pays
homage to the criminals responsible for millions of shattered lives.
What of the Obama ‘legacy’ in Syria and Libya?
How many million Africans and Arabs have been murdered or fled on rotten boats
in destitution. Only the rankest gang of corrupt media pundits in the US media
can pretend this gangster President should evade a war crimes tribunal.
Conclusion
The Obama regime has pursued wars of
unremitting destruction. It has forged partnerships with terrorists and death
squads as it seeks short-term imperial victories, which end in dismal failures.
The imperial legacy of this ‘historic’
president is a mirage of pillage, squalor and destruction. The effect of his
political lies has even begun register here among the American public: Who
trusts the US Congress and the President? And in Europe, who trusts Obama’s
European partners as they eagerly pushed for wars in the Middle East and North
Africa and now fear and loathe the millions of their victims–refugees fleeing
to the cities of Europe, with the drowned corpses of uprooted communities
spoiling their beaches?
Obama pushed for wars and the Europeans receive
the victims - with fear and disgust.
Obama’s victories are temporary, blighted and
reversed.
Obama bombed Afghanistan yesterday and now
flees renewed resistance.
Obama’s allies are again plundering Latin America
but face imminent ouster via popular uprisings.
Obama terrorized and fragmented Syria yesterday
but lost elections the day after.
Obama threatens China’s economy while eagerly
buying China’s products.
The Obama legacy began as a failed military and
economic offensive accompanying a profound social crisis. During his final year
in office, Obama tries to forge alliances with the dregs of the hard right to
save his legacy. His brief advance into this sordid world of neo-liberals,
neo-Nazis and Saudi despots is a prelude to more retreat and chaos.
Obama’s public celebration of the right turn in
Asia, Latin America, Europe and the Middle East applauds the most retrograde
alignment of forces in modern times: Saudis and Israelis; Egyptian generals and
Libyan jihadis; neo-Ottoman Turks with Ukrainian gangster-oligarchs. Regime
changes in Argentina and Brazil encourage Obama to claim vindication of his
imperial legacy.
His ‘moment’ of imperial truth is brief, all
too brief. Everywhere, we witness the rapid rise of imperial success followed
by a series of debacles.
Throughout Latin America capitalist profiteers
plunge into wild financial adventures, theft and chaos. In the Middle East, the
US stands on the crumbling palaces of a moribund Saudi regime. The much-proclaimed
imperial advances are based on grand theft everywhere, from Egypt and Turkey to
the Ukraine.
Simply stated: the US formula for a successful
legacy is failing at the precise moment that it claims success! Obama and the
Right have created a world of chaos and disintegration. Obama and his legions,
the US and Europe have no future in peace or war, election or defeats.
There is no imperial legacy for the ‘historic’
President Obama!
No comments:
Post a Comment