Is the dreaded Zika virus another giant scam?
by Jon Rappoport
January 28, 2016
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power
Outside The Matrix, click here.)
Hysteria sells and…
It’s hysteria time again. Let me run it down for you.
This is the word: The dreaded Zika virus!
Watch out! It’s carried by mosquitos! It can cause birth defects—babies are
born with very small heads and impaired brains!
Here are a few scare headlines that were running on
Drudge as of 1/26:
“Brazil sends 200,000 soldiers to stop spread of
Zika.”
“Stay away from Rio if you’re pregnant.”
“’Losing battle’ against mosquito.”
“Virus threatening two continents.”
Want more hysteria? The Daily Mail indicates pregnant
women are being warned not to travel to 22 countries in Latin America and
Africa. Several Zika cases are being reported in Italy, the UK, and Spain.
Then we have this from the Washington Post (“As Zika
virus spreads, El Salvador asks women not to get pregnant until 2018,” 1/22, with italics added):
“The rapid spread of the Zika virus has prompted Latin
American governments to urge women not to get pregnant for up to two
years, an extraordinary precaution aimed at avoiding birth defects believed
to be linked to the mosquito-borne illness.
“…a potentially culture-shaping phenomenon in which
the populations of several nations have been asked to delay procreation.
The World Health Organization says at least 20 countries or territories in the
region, including Barbados and Bolivia, Guadeloupe and Guatemala, Puerto Rico
and Panama, have registered transmission of the virus.”
So we now have governments warning women not to get
pregnant. A new form of depopulation. Don’t get pregnant. If you do, and a mosquito bites you, you could give
birth to a severely damaged child. Not only that, we have massive advisories
against travel, for pregnant women. And 200,000 soldiers in Brazil, the site of
the upcoming Olympics, are going door to door and distributing information
about this new “plague.” Are the soldiers also telling men and women not to
have sex? Who knows?
So let’s take a little side trip to Scam City and
examine the science behind the Zika virus and the assertion that it is causing
birth defects.
Before a virus can be said to cause disease, a few
procedures need to occur. First, the virus must be proved to exist. It has to
be isolated from a human carrier as diseased tissue, and then that tissue has
to be put under an electron microscope, where many, many (Zika) viruses can be
seen. Second, tests have to be run on many suspected human cases, and these
tests have to reveal very large amounts of Zika in the body. That’s your basic
starter kit for deciding that a virus might be causing actual human disease.
In examining the published literature on Zika, so far
I see no reports of diseased-tissue removal from a human, followed by electron
microscope photos revealing large amounts of Zika.
As far as diagnostic tests on suspected human cases
are concerned, I see, as usual, two major types of testing: antibody, and PCR.
I’ll briefly review the egregious
flaws in these
tests.
Antibodies are immune-system scouts which identify
invaders in the body. The antibodies ID these villains so other elements of the
immune system can repel and destroy them. When a test shows that antibodies
geared to a specific virus/villain (like Zika) are present in the body, it
means the body has contacted that Zika virus—if the test was done well and
didn’t come up with a falsely-positive result. False positives are frequent. But
more disastrously, proving the body had contact with a specific virus says
absolutely nothing about whether the patient is sick or will get sick. In
fact, before 1985, a positive antibody test was generally taken to be a good
sign: the body’s immune system had encountered and overcome the invader. After
1985, the “science” was turned upside down: a positive test meant the person
was sick or going to get sick. And that meant, of course, more (false)
diagnoses of disease and more profit from treatments. In announced “epidemics,”
health agencies can falsely inflate the numbers of cases to the moon.
The PCR is a very sophisticated and tricky test to
run. It is prone to errors. It takes a tiny, tiny amount of material assumed to
be a fragment of a virus, and it amplifies (blows up) that fragment so it can
be observed. The first problem with the test is: did technicians indeed choose
a tiny sample that actually is a piece of the virus in question? Or is it
simply a bit of genetic debris? The second problem is: the test, despite claims
to the contrary, says nothing reliable about the amount of
virus (like Zika) that is in the patient’s body. Why is this important? Because
you need a great deal of virus in the body to begin to say it is causing
disease. A very small amount is trivial.
With these two useless tests in tow—the antibody and
the PCR—researchers and doctors don’t have a meaningful clue about whether a
patient is ill as a result of Zika infection. All case-number reports are
suspect, to say the very least.
Therefore, attributing very serious problems to Zika
on a worldwide basis is insupportable and speculative. It isn’t science.
And to make the leap to claiming the virus is causing
pregnant women to give birth to babies with very small heads and impaired
brains is absurd.
Who benefits from this Zika “science”? Certainly, the
people who are releasing genetically engineered (GE) mosquitos as a form of
disease-prevention. The big honcho is a company named Oxitec. So far, the GE
mosquitos are being used to curtail dengue fever in Brazil, Malaysia, and the
Cayman Islands. Florida is next up on the agenda. But with Zika coming on strong in the press as a
“mosquito-carried plague,” how long will it be before special bugs are modified
to save the planet from this new threat…
Just a few problems with the GE mosquitos, though.
A town in Brazil has reported continuing elevated
levels of dengue fever since the GE (genetically engineered) mosquitoes have
been introduced to combat that disease.
The scientific hypothesis is: the trickster GE bugs
(males) will impregnate natural females, but no actual next generation will
occur beyond the larval stage. However, this plummeting birth rate in
mosquitoes is the only “proof” that the grand experiment is safe. No long-term
health studies have been done—this is a mirror of what happened when GMO crops
were introduced: no science, just bland assurances.
Needless to say, without extensive lab testing, there
is no way to tell what these GE mosquitoes are actually harboring, in addition
to what researchers claim. That’s a major red flag.
Wherever these GE mosquitoes have been introduced, or
are about to be introduced, the human populations have not been consulted for
their permission. It’s all being done by government and corporate edict. It’s
human experimentation on a grand scale.
There are concerns that, if indeed the dengue-carrying
mosquitos are actually wiped out, the vacuum may be filled by another dengue
carrier, the Asian Tiger Mosquito—which breeds much faster.
Other than that, everything is perfect. Let’s have a
big parade and welcome genetically-engineered mosquitos to planet Earth.
Back to the Zika virus: what actually is causing
mothers to give birth to babies with very small heads and impaired brains? If
this is indeed a fairly recent phenomenon, I would start with a deep and very
specific investigation of the genetically engineered mosquitos that were
recently released in Brazil to decimate the dengue-fever mosquitos.
Then I would pay attention to a report like this (Rio
Times, 5/5/15, “Brazil
Shown to Be Largest Global Consumer of Pesticides”):
“The use of pesticides in Brazil grew by more than 162
percent from 2000 to 2012, according to the latest report by the Brazilian
Association of Collective Health (ABRASCO), making the country the number one
consumer of pesticides in the world. According to the entity, the Brazilian
agriculture sector purchased more than 823,000 tons of pesticides in 2012.”
“The ABRASCO report, titled ‘An Alert
of the Impacts of Pesticides on Health’, was released last week in Rio de Janeiro. The report
includes scientific studies including data from the National Cancer Institute
that shows a direct link between the use of pesticides and health problems.”
A quote inside the report:
“Not only are we using more [pesticides] but we are
using more powerful, stronger pesticides. We have been forced to import
pesticides which were not even allowed in Brazil to combat pests which attacked
GM soybean and cotton plants…”
“…22 of the fifty main active ingredients used in
pesticides in Brazil today have been banned in most other countries. “
How about an in-depth investigation, on the ground,
probing the connection between these pesticides and birth defects?
Or is it better, for the chosen few, to use a virus as
a false cover story, in order to explain away horrendous damage from what
amounts to chemical warfare?
****Try this study, published in Environmental Health
Perspectives on July 1, 2011:“Urinary Biomarkers of Prenatal
Atrazine Exposure…” Here
is a quote referring to what is now being called a prime Zika effect:
“The presence versus absence of quantifiable levels of
[the pesticide] atrazine or a specific atrazine metabolite was associated with
fetal growth restriction… and small head circumference… Head circumference was
also inversely associated with the presence of the herbicide metolachlor.”
Getting the picture?
Of course, both Atrazine and metolachlor pesticides
are used in Brazil. Why is this connection to birth defects being overlooked?
If this is still a serious question, in this day and age, and if the answers
aren’t obvious, the questioner just arrived from Pluto.
I have walked the path of making these
connections since 1987.
The covert op is played exactly like the old shell game. Look here, don’t look
there. This is important, that means nothing.
Tons and tons and tons of various pesticides and other
poisonous chemicals…but forget that, it’s all because of a virus.
“A virus” is the best false cover story ever invented.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE
MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE
THE MATRIX, Jon
was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District
of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the
purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a
Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years,
writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA
Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health,
logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for
his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine
emails here.
No comments:
Post a Comment