They’ve been through A with AIDS, C with cancer, D
with diabetes, E with Ebola, H1N1, superbugs, etc. Now, they are down to Z with
Zika virus.
Here’s the fear mongering channeled through Reuters,
“There is no treatment for Zika infection.
Efforts to combat Zika are focused on protecting
people from being bitten and on eradicating mosquitoes, a tough task in many
parts of Latin America, where people live in poverty and there are plentiful
breeding grounds for the insect.
“We do not have a vaccine for Zika yet. The only thing
we can do is fight the mosquito,” Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff said on
Friday, reiterating her call for a national eradication effort.
Rousseff said tests for the development of a vaccine
would begin next week at the Butantan Institute, one of Brazil’s leading
biomedical research centers in São Paulo.
U.S. President Barack Obama spoke on Friday with
Rousseff about the spread of the virus, the White House said.
“The leaders agreed on the importance of collaborative
efforts to deepen our knowledge, advance research and accelerate work to develop
better vaccines and other technologies to control the virus,” the
White House said in a statement.
Zika has hit Brazil just as it prepares to host the
Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro on Aug. 5-21, an event that draws hundreds of
thousands of athletes, team officials and spectators. The International Olympic
Committee (IOC) assured teams on Friday the Olympics would be safe from Zika,
but urged visitors to carefully protect themselves.
U.S. lawmakers have begun to press the Obama
administration for details of its response to Zika. At least 31 people in the
country have been infected, all of them after travel to affected countries.”
We should not just be looking at the issue from the
standpoint of healthcare only but also from its geopolitical implications.
Because, as always, the enemies of humanity do have the skills, capability and
appetite for inflicting pain and suffering into many aspects of our existence.
With bioweapon Zika virus, they can:
- shake
up one of the pillars of the BRICS Collective, i.e. Brazil’s economy, to
hasten its fall from grace [here, here, and here];
- continue
thinning the herd through mass sterilizations via birth control
virus-tainted vaccines in pursuant to their upgraded United Nations’
Sustainable Agenda 2030, and;
- continue
profiting from sales of more vaccines.
The development and spread of the Zika virus in Brazil
is never an act of nature.
Zika Outbreak Epicenter in Same Area Where GM
Mosquitoes Were Released in 2015
The World Health Organization announced it will convene an Emergency Committee under International
Health Regulations on Monday, February 1, concerning the Zika virus ‘explosive’
spread throughout the Americas. The virus reportedly has the potential to reach
pandemic proportions — possibly around the globe. But understanding why this
outbreak happened is vital to curbing it. As the WHO statement said:
A causal relationship between Zika virus infection and
birth malformations and neurological syndromes … is strongly suspected. [These
links] have rapidly changed the risk profile of Zika, from a mild threat to one
of alarming proportions.
WHO is deeply concerned about this rapidly evolving
situation for 4 main reasons: the possible association of infection with birth
malformations and neurological syndromes; the potential for further
international spread given the wide geographical distribution of the mosquito
vector; the lack of population immunity in newly affected areas; and the
absence of vaccines, specific treatments, and rapid diagnostic tests […]
The level of concern is high, as is the level of
uncertainty.
Zika seemingly exploded out of nowhere. Though it was
first discovered in 1947, cases only sporadically occurred throughout Africa
and southern Asia. In 2007, the first case was reported in the Pacific. In
2013, a smattering of small outbreaks and individual cases were officially
documented in Africa and the western Pacific. They also began showing up in the
Americas. In May 2015, Brazil reported its first case of Zika virus — and the
situation changed dramatically.
Brazil is now considered the epicenter of the Zika outbreak, which
coincides with at least 4,000 reports of babies born withmicrocephaly just since October.
When examining a rapidly expanding potential pandemic,
it’s necessary to leave no stone unturned so possible solutions, as well as
future prevention, will be as effective as possible. In that vein, there was
another significant development in 2015.
Oxitec first unveiled its large-scale, genetically-modified mosquito
farm in Brazil in July 2012, with the goal of reducing “the incidence of dengue
fever,” as The Disease Daily reported. Dengue fever is spread by the same Aedes mosquitoes
which spread the Zika virus — and though they “cannot fly more than 400
meters,” WHO stated, “it may inadvertently be transported by humans from one
place to another.” By July 2015, shortly after the GM mosquitoes were first
released into the wild in Juazeiro, Brazil, Oxitec proudlyannounced they had “successfully controlled the Aedes
aegyptimosquito that spreads dengue fever, chikungunya and zika virus, by
reducing the target population by more than 90%.”
Though that might sound like an astounding success —
and, arguably, it was — there is an alarming possibility to consider.
Nature, as one Redditor keenly pointed out, finds a way — and the effort to control dengue,
zika, and other viruses, appears to have backfired dramatically.
Juazeiro, Brazil — the location where
genetically-modified mosquitoes were first released into the wild.
Map showing the concentration of suspected
Zika-related cases ofmicrocephaly in Brazil.
The particular strain of Oxitec GM mosquitoes, OX513A,
are genetically altered so the vast majority of their offspring will die before
they mature — though Dr. Ricarda Steinbrecher published concerns in a report in September 2010 that a known survival rate of 3-4 percent
warranted further study before the release of the GM insects. Her concerns,
which were echoed by several other scientists both at the time and since,
appear to have been ignored — though they should not have been.
Those genetically-modified mosquitoes work to control
wild, potentially disease-carrying populations in a very specific manner. Only
the male modified Aedes mosquitoes are supposed to be released
into the wild — as they will mate with their unaltered female counterparts.
Once offspring are produced, the modified, scientific facet is supposed to
‘kick in’ and kill that larvae before it reaches breeding age — if tetracycline
is not present during its development. But there is a problem.
According to an unclassified document from the Trade and Agriculture Directorate
Committee for Agriculture dated February 2015, Brazil is the third largest in
“global antimicrobial consumption in food animal production” — meaning, Brazil
is third in the world for its use of tetracycline in its food animals. As a
study by the American Society of Agronomy, et. al., explained, “It is estimated that approximately 75% of
antibiotics are not absorbed by animals and are excreted in waste.” One of the
antibiotics (or antimicrobials) specifically named in that report for its
environmental persistence is tetracycline.
Aedes aegypti mosquito. Image credit: Muhammad Mahdi Karim
In fact, as a confidential internal Oxitec document divulged in 2012, that survival rate could be as
high as 15% — even with low levels of tetracycline present. “Even small amounts
of tetracycline can repress” the engineered lethality. Indeed, that 15%
survival rate was described by Oxitec:
After a lot of testing and comparing experimental
design, it was found that [researchers] had used a cat food to feed the
[OX513A] larvae and this cat food contained chicken. It is known that
tetracycline is routinely used to prevent infections in chickens, especially in
the cheap, mass produced, chicken used for animal food. The chicken is
heat-treated before being used, but this does not remove all the tetracycline.
This meant that a small amount of tetracycline was being added from the food to
the larvae and repressing the [designed] lethal system.
Even absent this tetracycline, as Steinbrecher
explained, a “sub-population” of genetically-modified Aedes mosquitoes
could theoretically develop and thrive, in theory, “capable of surviving and
flourishing despite any further” releases of ‘pure’ GM mosquitoes which still
have that gene intact. She added, “the effectiveness of the system also depends
on the [genetically-designed] late onset of the lethality. If the time of onset
is altered due to environmental conditions … then a 3-4% [survival rate]
represents a much bigger problem…”
As the WHO stated in its press release, “conditions
associated with this year’s El Nino weather pattern are expected to increase
mosquito populations greatly in many areas.”
Incidentally, President Obama called for a massive research effortto develop a vaccine for the Zika virus, as one does
not currently exist. Brazil has now called in 200,000 soldiers to somehow help combat the virus’ spread. Aedes mosquitoes
have reportedly beenspotted in the U.K. But perhaps the most ironic — or not
—proposition was proffered on January 19, by the MIT
Technology Review:
An outbreak in the Western Hemisphere could give
countries including the United States new reasons to try wiping out mosquitoes
with genetic engineering.
Yesterday, the Brazilian city of Piracicaba said it
would expand the use of genetically modified mosquitoes …
The GM mosquitoes were created by Oxitec, a British
company recently purchased by Intrexon, a synthetic biology company based in
Maryland. The company said it has released bugs in parts of Brazil and the
Cayman Islands to battle dengue fever.
This article (Zika Outbreak Epicenter in Same Area
Where GM Mosquitoes Were Released in 2015) is free and open source. You have permission to
republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Claire Bernish and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If
you spot a typo, email edits@theantimedia.org.
Here’s more to the Zika story…
Zika Freakout: The Hoax and the Covert Op Continue
Thanks to reporters and researchers Jim Stone, Kathy Ford, the fullerton informer, Jim West, Martin Maloney, and Claus Jensen, who have moved
this story forward and exposed the scam.
If you want to hide anything on this planet, twist it
into a (fake) story about a virus. You’re home free.
This is my second article on the Zika-virus scam (article
archivehere). I’ve been to these rodeos before: HIV, West Nile,
Swine Flu, SARS, Ebola. In each case, a virus is blamed for illness and
death that actually arises from other causes.
The Zika virus, now being blamed for the birth of
babies with very small heads and impaired brains, has been around for a long
time—late 1940s, early 1950s—and suddenly, without warning or reason, after
inducing, at best, mild illness, it’s producing horrendous damage? This is
called a clue. A clue that scientific liars are lying. Furthermore, many of the
women who are giving birth to deformed babies test negative for the presence of
the Zika Virus.
So, what is causing babies to be born with very small
heads and brain damage? While researching my first book in 1987-8, AIDS INC., I concluded: don’t assume there is only one
cause for illness. That can be very misleading. Various factors can combine to
produce disease and death.
For example, in the case of this “Zika” phenomenon:
One: Pesticide use in Brazil:
Brazil, the center of the “Zika” crisis, uses more
pesticides than any nation in the world. Some of these are banned in 22 other
countries. And as for babies born with smaller heads, here is a study from
Environmental Health Perspectives (July 1, 2011), “Urinary Biomarkers of Prenatal Atrazine
Exposure…”:
“The presence versus absence of quantifiable levels of
[the pesticide] atrazine or a specific atrazine metabolite was associated with
fetal growth restriction… and small head circumference… Head
circumference was also inversely associated with the presence of the herbicide
metolachlor.” (emphasis
added)
Atrazine and metolachlor are both used in Brazil.
Two: The TdaP vaccine:
This is a case of suspicious correlation. A study
posted in the US National Library of Medicine, “Pertussis in young infants: a
severe vaccine-preventable disease,” spells it out:
“…in late 2014, the [Brazilian] Ministry of Health
announced the introduction of the Tdap vaccine for all pregnant women in
Brazil.”
Obviously, pregnant women are the target group; they
are giving birth to babies with smaller heads and brain damage, and the
recommendation for them to take the vaccine was recent; 2014.
Barbara Loe Fisher, of the National
Vaccine Information Center,
writes:
“Drug companies did not test the safety and
effectiveness of giving influenza or Tdap vaccine to pregnant women before the
vaccines were licensed in the U.S and there is almost no data on inflammatory
or other biological responses to these vaccines that could affect pregnancy and
birth outcomes…The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lists influenza and Tdap
vaccines as either Pregnancy Category B or C biologicals which means that
adequate testing has not been done in humans to demonstrate safety for pregnant
women and it is not known whether the vaccines can cause fetal harm or affect
reproduction capacity. The manufacturers of influenza and Tdap vaccines
state that human toxicity and fertility studies are inadequate and warn that
the influenza and Tdap vaccines should ‘be given to a pregnant woman only if
clearly needed.’” (emphasis
added)
Three: Genetically engineered mosquitoes that have
already been released in Brazil to “combat” dengue fever—a project implemented
by Oxitec, a company supplied with grant money from Bill Gates:
A town in Brazil has reported continuing elevated
levels of dengue fever since the GE (genetically engineered) mosquitoes have
been introduced to combat that disease.
The scientific hypothesis is: the trickster GE bugs
(males) will impregnate natural females, but no actual next generation will
occur beyond the larval stage. However, this plummeting birth rate in
mosquitoes is the only “proof” that the grand experiment is safe. No long-term
health studies have been done—this is a mirror of what happened when GMO crops
were introduced: no science, just bland assurances.
Needless to say, without extensive lab testing, there
is no way to tell what toxic elements these GE mosquitoes may actually be
harboring, in addition to what researchers claim. That’s a major red flag.
Wherever these GE mosquitoes have been introduced, or
are about to be introduced, the human populations have not been consulted for
their permission. It’s all being done by government and corporate edict. It’s
human experimentation on a grand scale.
Four: Pesticide manufacturing in Brazil:
Reuters, May 19, 2015, “Brazil prosecutors seek $16 million
from pesticide makers”:
“Brazilian prosecutors said on Monday they would seek
at least 50 million reais ($16.6 million) from multinational pesticide
manufacturers for alleged safety violations at a collection facility for used
pesticide containers… Those manufacturers, prosecutors said, include the
Brazilian units of BASF, DuPont, Monsanto, Nufarm, Syngenta, Adama, FMC and
Nortox… The charges come as scientists, regulators, public health officials and
consumers increasingly complain that Brazil’s ascent as an agricultural
powerhouse has led to unsafe and excessive use of pesticides. Reuters reported
in April that at least four foreign manufacturers sell pesticides in
Brazil that they are not allowed to sell in their home markets.” (emphasis added)
How convenient for these corporate giants to evade
blame for horrific birth effects—out of nowhere a virus is touted as the cause.
Five: Severe and endemic malnutrition, lack of basic
sanitation, and grinding poverty:
These are major factors in all illness and death, in
the areas where they are prevalent (e.g., major parts of Brazil). Suppression
of the immune system is the result, and anything that then comes down the
pipeline, germs or manmade toxic substances, become catastrophic to the body.
Six: anti-mosquito sprays:
The Guardian, January 26, 2015, “Brazil is ‘badly losing’ the battle
against Zika virus, says health minister”:
Sprays are now being given out to 400,000 pregnant
women in Brazil. Naturally, the sprays are toxic. What better way to multiply
the attack on mothers and their unborn children? For example, widely used
organophosphates in sprays can be highly disruptive to the nervous system.
Some or all of these six elements I’ve listed, in
combination, form a sustained attack on human life.
And as I keep stressing, the virus becomes the formidable
cover story that conceals the truth.
And don’t forget the Rio Olympic Games, coming up in
August. There are multiple scenarios which could play out in front of a global
television audience. Will Zika be pushed as some sort of worldwide pandemic? Will a Zika vaccine be magically “discovered” and rushed into production, in time to show (as an advertisement) lines of
people dutifully trudging up to receive shots?
Every fake epidemic is, in part, designed to create
fear and induce blind compliance to medical and government dictates. The germ
is positioned as the “tiny terrorist” in this stage play.
In my first book, AIDS INC. (1988), I indicated that covert medical ops are the
most dangerous, because they appear to be politically neutral, they fly under
no flag, and they claim to forward only humanitarian aims. But in fact, modern
“Rockefeller Medicine” is built as a vast partner in the Globalization of the
planet. Its vision is a universal in-utero-to-cradle-to-grave system for the
human race: every human walks a bleak lifelong path of disease-diagnosis after
diagnosis, receiving toxic drugs and vaccines at every turn, which weaken his
body and mind, and make him unable to consider what is happening outside his
perimeter of suffering or resist political totalitarianism.
Medical freedom means: the freedom to refuse medical
care, and it’s based on knowledge of destructive effects. This freedom must
win, against any odds.
“Official science” is a contradiction in terms, and a
grand illusion.
Like all other outbreaks before, we are calling this
one just another fear mongering to divert our attention from more pressing
global issues and for what they are about to do.
We already have the effective means to defeat any
known and unknown viral infections.
No comments:
Post a Comment