Column: Politics
Region: Russia in the World
It may
not be the United States. There is a war going on, not in Syria or against
Eastern Ukraine or the dozen other hot spots around the world. World War III
may already be under way, started over Sinai when an airliner was downed, or
over Ukraine when another was downed or maybe on the pages of a newspaper.
Governments spend nearly as much on
the stuff of conspiracy theories, hoaxes, black propaganda, or even organizing
their own opposition, be it phony activist groups or even terror organizations
than they spend on spying on their own people, and we are learning how much
that has cost with frightening revelations nearly every day.
Before we move into background, we
might want to take a minute to look at something. In today’s world of “internet
reality” where a viral YouTube video a child could create with computer
generated graphics and crisis actors may well now be preferred to the old
standby, attacking yourself using agent provocateurs wearing enemy uniforms.
Governments have found that events
like 9/11, claimed by engineers, scientists and investigators to be something
totally different that claimed by the Bush regime in Washington, are no longer
needed to start wars or justify the takeover of American government by
organized crime, most probably the real reason for the 9/11 “event.”
What can safely be assumed is that
nothing is what it seems, no terror group, no “outrage,” not even the
geopolitical conflicts fed the masses. Anyone who refuses to knuckle under to
organized crime is targeted for regime change, typically begun by either
sanctions, a color revolution or a “just add water” instant terror group like
ISIS or Boko Harum, intelligence agency constructs so obvious that little
explanation is needed.
You see, one government can never
accuse another of a false flag attack, not and risk being accused of spreading
“conspiracy theories,” no matter how lame the event such as the 7/7 London
attacks debunked by John Anthony Hill in his film, Ripple Effect, or the
Charlie Hebdo “event” in Paris, deconstructed by Dr. Kevin Barrett in his
widely banned book, “We are Not Charlie.”
The question today, or how we begin,
is taking a quick look at the highly acclaimed somewhat fictional political
television show in America called Madame Secretary. In this very popular
mainstream network fictional drama, a woman becomes Secretary of State when her
corrupt predecessor is murdered in what is later learned, on the TV show at
least, to be a plot by the CIA to bring about a war with Russia.
A few episodes later something quite
amazing happens. Though characters in this type of drama are usually fictional
and bashing Russia or Iran has been a Hollywood staple for some time, a new and
very unexpected plot line emerges.
In this story, the President’s plane,
Air Force One, is “hacked,” taken control of totally and is nearly destroyed,
killing the fictional president played by veteran actor Keith Carradine. Russia
is immediately blamed and America retaliates by disabling Moscow’s power grid
through.
Then something quite amazing happens.
As both Russia and America approach a nuclear confrontation, it is learned that
the real attack was staged, not by Russia, but by the new government of
Ukraine, a government brought to power by a US backed coup. The new president
of Ukraine had ordered the terror attack, remind you the “fictional” new
president of a not so fictional Ukraine, in order to blame Russia and convince
the US to flood Ukraine with weapons, “lethal aid” as opposed to advisors.
Ukraine believed that a false flag
ploy might actually bring in American forces, which as we learn, would have
been subjected to attack by Ukrainian Secret Service dressed as Russian troops.
This is the question we pose, was
this plotline in Madame Secretary, framed with a highly accurate depiction of
Washington politics and American policymaking procedure set in a much respected
television drama the only way a certain “official channel” in Washington could
explain is position on the MH17 downing?
The comparison between the real and
fictional events are simply too close to ignore. Now we can do some background.
Yesterday, the UK Guardian, the
world’s last mainstream “investigative news organization,” reported that
470,000 had been killed in the Syrian conflict, a much higher figure than given
before. The source for that figure, which any reasonable analyst can assume
will be blamed on Russia or the Assad government in Damascus, was not just
obscure, it was a total fabrication.
The Guardian and the hundreds of
other news organizations that picked up the story, were quoting the Syrian
Center for Policy Research. Within minutes a web page was found, one created
from a template in less than an hour.
A Facebook listing was found as well
as well as several online voluntary listings typically used by ad hoc groups
such as the 1.5 million “non-governmental organizations,” or NGO’s the UN no
longer bothers to be involved with anymore.
There is no membership for the SCPR,
no governing board, no officers, no offices listed, no specifics of any kind.
When I reported this to Veterans Today’s editor, Jim W. Dean, he immediately
assumed defacto control of the ethereal organization, not assuming they were a
harmless hoax but rather, though done in a humorous vein, they are something
else.
Maybe the vacuous “SCPR” is just like
the “SHRO,” the source of the long debunked sarin gas stories that nearly
brought the world to war, yes the good old “Syrian Human Rights Observatory,”
the all-powerful source of information the Guardian, Washington Post and other
news organizations still use.
Some months ago, it was found
initially by Veterans Today and then by Russia Today that the “SHRO” was
actually one man living over a noodle shop in the bleak British town of
Coventry. The hundreds, maybe even thousands of news stories issued by him, as
one man is not a “group” or “organization,” were all simply made up. The
“confirmed reports” that nearly brought the world to war were not so innocent
inventions.
Worse still, in the United States,
the profound anti-government movement, a combination of militia extremists,
white supremacists, the Israeli-Saudi-Turkish lobby and organized crime, which
includes not only Wall Street but their real lifelong partners in narcotics and
human trafficking, the Pentagon and running America’s political parties.
Somehow, in the process those
opposing Washington’s excesses were to embrace not only closed borders but
became torture advocates, push for expanded police powers, lower wages, fewer
consumer and environmental protections and elimination of all oversight of
election fraud.
Thus, those screaming to jail Obama
and Clinton also hail “boots on the ground” in Ukraine, Syria, Afghanistan and
seizure of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.
Let’s suppose America’s elections are
rigged, that Bush was never fairly elected, that congress is bought and paid
for with drug money and that America’s courts, media and police are totally
corrupt, run by drug cartels or paid off by foreign intelligence services.
Then, were this last statement a safe
assumption, and I believe this to be the case, wouldn’t every political,
intellectual and social function that failed to take these “facts” into account
be nothing more than folly and delusion?
Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam
War that has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades and consulted with
governments challenged by security issues. He’s a senior editor and chairman of
the board of Veterans Today, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
No comments:
Post a Comment