By Moti Nissani
“If voting made any difference they wouldn’t let us do
it.”
― Mark Twain
“What is the use of voting? We know that the
machines of both parties are subsidized by the same persons, and therefore it
is useless to turn in either direction.”
—Woodrow Wilson
History reinforces the view that nothing can be
expected from electoral politics in America (and in most other countries of the
world). If change ever comes to our shores, it cannot possibly be brought
about by politics as usual.
Many of my acquaintances, and many writers in the
alternative media, put their faith in electoral politics. They feel,
despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that it makes a difference
whether a Republican or a Democrat is elected, that it makes sense to sue the
government for one or another gross violation of the public interest or common
decency. They fail to notice that most of our presidents, governors, and
mayors, most of our “elected” representatives at the local, state, and federal
levels, most of our judges—are puppets of the men in the shadows (a few
international banking families and their lieutenants in huge corporations,
governments, armed forces, and intelligence services).
Others acquaintances, a bit more sophisticated but
still profoundly misinformed about the nature of American politics, reject the
corrupt two-headed party system out of hand, yet put their trust in the
electoral process itself and in the ability of friends of the American people
(as opposed to the traitors, swindlers, sycophants, and psychopaths who now
infest most public offices of this land) to gain political or judicial office
and bring about meaningful change. That trust is touching, but it fails
to acknowledge incontestable political realities. To campaign for a Ron
Paul, or a Bernie Sanders, or a Donald Trump, or a Eugene Debs, or Jesus of
Nazareth himself, in this system is counterproductive. A few crystalline
raindrops cannot disinfect a cesspool.
The reasons for this futility, the reasons it is
misguided in principle and perhaps even immoral to take part in electoral
politics are many. For the moment, I can only offer a summary statement
and some supporting documentation for the seven interacting factors (there
could be more, but at this writing I can only think of seven) that render
electoral politics in America a sad joke (for a more detailed review of the
first three factors, please consult this).
1. Information
“I am sure that I never read any memorable news in the
newspaper.”
–Henry David Thoreau (Walden, 1854)
“American Journalism is a class institution, serving
the rich and spurning the poor.”
–Upton Sinclair (The Brass Check, 1919)
Almost all conventional sources of
information—schools, universities, think tanks, books, movies, newspapers, TV,
radio—are under the thumb of the men in the shadows. Most of us,
therefore, end up voting against our own convictions and interests. For
example, in 1919 Upton Sinclair (The Brass Check, p. 9) already sizzled:
“The social body to which we belong is at this moment
passing through one of the greatest crises of its history . . . What if the
nerves upon which we depend for knowledge of this social body should give us
false reports of its condition?”
Many people put their trust in experts, not realizing
the centuries-long dependence of academics and intellectuals on the bankers and
their lieutenants. Arthur Schopenhauer:
“Party interests are vehemently agitating the pens of
so many pure lovers of wisdom. . . . Truth is certainly
the last thing they have in mind. . . . Philosophy is
misused, from the side of the state as a tool, from the other side as a means
of gain. . . . Who can really believe that truth also will
thereby come to light, just as a by-product? . . . Governments
make of philosophy a means of serving their state interests, and scholars make
of it a trade.”
This is even truer today, and especially so when it
comes to disciplines that directly affect the bankers. As just one
example, an article in the mainstream press explains “how the federal reserve bought the economics
profession:”
“The Federal Reserve, through its extensive network of
consultants, visiting scholars, alumni, and staff economists, so thoroughly
dominates the field of economics that real criticism of the central bank has
become a career liability for members of the profession. . . . This dominance
helps explain how, even after the Fed failed to foresee the greatest economic
collapse since the Great Depression, the central bank has largely escaped
criticism from academic economists.”
William Hogarth, “Scholars Listening to a Lecture,”
1736
Prof. Anatal Fekete provides a less polite characterization:
“The light has gone out at the great American
universities as far as monetary science is concerned. Through bribe,
blackmail, and attrition all upright and serious monetary economists were
bumped from their academic chairs. The Great Chinese Cultural Revolution
was a picnic in comparison to the Great American Cultural Revolution
eliminating monetary economics from the curriculum.”
I wish to make the point clear: Information nowadays
is controlled everywhere and always. For instance, the bankers
reserve to themselves the right of censoring all academic publishing (not only
in economics, history, or political “science,” but also in the natural sciences) under the guise of the referee
system. And here is another typical example, this time from the
strait-jacketed world of children book publishing. Madeleine L’Engle looks back:
“A Wrinkle in Time was almost never published.
You can’t name a major publisher who didn’t reject it. And there were
many reasons. One was that it was supposedly too hard for children.
Well, my children were 7, 10, and 12 while I was writing it. I’d read to
them at night what I’d written during the day, and they’d say, “Ooh, mother, go
back to the typewriter!” A Wrinkle in Time had a female protagonist in a
science fiction book, and that wasn’t done. And it dealt with evil and
things that you don’t find, or didn’t at that time, in children’s books.
When we’d run through forty-odd publishers, my agent sent it back. We gave
up. Then my mother was visiting for Christmas, and I gave her a tea party
for some of her old friends. One of them happened to belong to a small
writing group run by John Farrar, of Farrar, Straus & Giroux, which at that
time did not have a juvenile list. She insisted that I meet John any how,
and I went down with my battered manuscript. John had read my first novel
and liked it, and read this book and loved it. That’s how it happened.”
Recommended Starting References: 1. Sinclair, U. 1919. The Brass Check. 2. Carlin, George. Who Really Runs America? 3. Loewen, James, 1995. Lies my Teacher
Told me. 4. Media Coverage of the Greenhouse Effect. Population and Environment: A Journal of
Interdisciplinary Studies 21: 27-43.
Freedom Sculpture, Philadelphia,
Zenos Frudakis: “I wanted to create a sculpture almost anyone, regardless of
their background, could look at and instantly recognize that it is about the
idea of struggling to break free. This sculpture is about the struggle for
achievement of freedom through the creative process.”
2. Sunshine Bribery
In the USA, bribery is institutionalized. In
fact, if one looks only at the sheer quantity of wealth being stolen from the
people, one can perhaps surmise that the USA is the most corrupt country that
has ever existed. Bribery is implemented principally through campaign
financing, then complemented by such things as lucrative speaking and
publishing arrangements after leaving office and by invitations to serve on the
boards of the corporations that benefited from the ex-politician’s or
ex-judge’s duplicity. As a result, politicians and judges gain adoration
and millions, while a handful of banking families and their thousands of
corporations gain extraordinary power and trillions.
Over the years we have gotten used to occasional
outbursts on this issue (please consult this source for countless quotations). For instance,
in 1987, Robert Byrd, then Senate majority leader, appealed to his colleagues:
“It is my strong belief that the great majority of
senators–of both parties–know that the current system of campaign financing is
damaging the Senate, hurts their ability to be the best senator for this nation
and for citizens of their respective States that they could be, strains their
family life by consuming even more time than their official responsibilities
demand, and destroys the democracy we all cherish by eroding public confidence
in its integrity. If we do not face a problem of this magnitude and fix
it, we have no one but ourselves to blame for the tragic results.”
Political scientists Adamany and Agree share that
view:
“[The] political finance system . . .
undermines the ideals and hampers the performance of American democracy . . . .
Officials . . . are . . . captives of the present
system. Their integrity and judgment are menaced—and too often compromised—by
the need to raise money and the means now available for doing it . . . . The
pattern of giving distorts American elections: candidates win access to the
electorate only if they can mobilize money from the upper classes, established
interest groups, big givers, or ideological zealots. Other alternatives have
difficulty getting heard. And the voters’ choice is thereby limited. The
pattern of giving also threatens the governmental process: the contributions of
big givers and interest groups award them access to officeholders, so they can
better plead their causes . . . . The private financing system . .
. distort[s] both elections and decision making. The equality of citizens
on election day is diluted by their inequality in campaign financing. The electorate
shares its control of officials with the financial constituency.”
A 2013 update:
“Pretty much every politician in the western world is
basically an employee of the ruling class, which is made up of a handful of
traditionally powerful families including the Rothschilds and Rockefellers.”
Recommended Starting Reference: Pillars of American “Democracy:”
Sunshine Bribery.
3. Contemporary Human Failings
We are not only indoctrinable, but seem to enjoy being
brainwashed (how many of us abstain from commercials and TV?). We are not
as open-minded as we need to be, nor do we readily surrender convictions in the face of overwhelming evidence
against them. More often than not, we prefer obedience and conformity to
individualism and critical thinking. Most of us lack the self-confidence,
and perhaps the inborn taste, to detect quality on our own—in food,
architecture, music, drama, paintings, literature, or politics. The vast
majority of the still-reading public (which is itself a small minority) depends
on the bankers for their choice of books, instead of trusting their own tastes
and proclivities. Many of us have accepted the bankers’ absurd
self-serving notion that crass materialism, endless accumulation of money and
power, consumerism, specialization, and selfishness hold the keys to personal
fulfillment.
Moreover, these failings are magnified by the
diminution—probably deliberate—of our very humanity. Our bodies nowadays
are loaded with synthetic chemicals, heavy metals (e.g., mercury, lead), and
radioactive substances. Our brains are loaded with thousands of
commercials, infomercials, trivialities, and lies. It is no accident that
the bankers facilitate prescription and illegal drug use in the USA, for such
use clearly serves their interests. The bankers and their allies
discourage us from ever getting even close to dissident literature, classical
music, folk music, critical or holistic thinking, compassion, and
non-conformity. By getting us addicted to TV and artless movies, through
their control of the educational system, and by doing everything they can to
suppress the love of reading, they even managed to diminish our vocabulary—and
thus our capacity to detect nuances of speech and thought.
Consider Thomas Paine’s 1776 pamphlet, Common
Sense. According to Wikipedia, “in relation to the population of the
Colonies at that time, it had the largest sale and circulation of any book in
American history.” Could 1% of today’s Americans understand and be moved
by such a pamphlet? In just 239 years, then, there occurred a remarkable
decline in the intellectual and spiritual caliber of the American people.
In short, we are not as rational, altruistic, and
compassionate as we should be. On top of that, the bankers have
deliberately diminished our positive qualities and amplified our failings, thus
putting another nail in the coffin of our electoral process.
Recommended Starting References: Human Failings: 1. Milgram, Stanley,
Obedience to Authority. 2. Conceptual Conservatism: An Understated
Variable in Human Affairs? Social
Science Journal, vol. 31, pp. 307-318. Human Strengths (under
natural conditions, human beings prefer cooperation, freedom, and rough
equality of material possessions): 1. Stefansson, Vilhjalmur. Lessons In Living From The Stone
Age. In A
Treasury of Science, 1943, p. 502. 2. Mann, Charles C. 2005. The Founding Sachems. 3. Harris, Marvin. Life Without Chiefs.
4. Cloak and Dagger
The Master Spider? According to David Rockefeller’s
own “encyclopedia,” he “has interfaced with every United States
president since Eisenhower . . . has connections to the Central Intelligence
Agency . . . was extensively briefed on covert intelligence operations . . .
sits at the core of a network of the most powerful and influential businessmen
and women in corporate America. . . began a lifelong association with the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) when he joined as a director in 1949 . . .
helped found the Trilateral Commission in July 1973 .”
Occasionally, in ancient Rome or Greece, or 21st
century UK or USA, a champion of the people poses a threat to the Machiavellian
system itself. In such cases, overwhelming evidence suggests, the top
oligarchs resort to character—or literal—assassinations.
They routinely
malign, incarcerate, poison, or blow the brains out of anyone, anywhere on
earth, who threatens their control—whistle blowers, congressmen, judges, U.S.
presidents, DC madams who know too much, environmental activists, businessmen
who dare tell the American people the truth about the Mexican Gulf disaster,
sport celebrities naïve and idealistic enough to join the neo-colonial armies
yet smart enough to read the writings of fake dissidents, journalists who
uncover the bankers’ collusion in the “war” on drugs, American peace activists,
singers/songwriters with a huge fan base who figure out how the system
works—and dare share this information with the public, movie directors who had
come to know a member of the Rockefeller family a bit too well—and who are bold
enough to tell the world what they have learned, British princesses who speak
up against landmines, union leaders, the bankers’ own head of the IMF
(International Mafia Fund), countless foreign heads of state who would not
betray their countrymen.
US Senator Frank Church displays a Central Institute
of Assassinations (CIA) poison dart gun that, depending on the poison used,
causes an immediate heart attack or belated cancer, 1975. According to
Congressional testimony, the gun fires a frozen liquid poison-tipped dart, the
width of a human hair and a quarter of an inch long. The dart can penetrate
clothing and leaves a barely-visible pin-sized tiny red mark where it enters
the victim’s body. In the heart attack version, once in the body, the poison
melts and is absorbed into the bloodstream and causes a heart attack. Once the
damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that a routine autopsy is
likely to trace the heart attack to natural causes. Church probably paid for
his courage–and for his progressive record–with his life. By 1984, at the early
of 59, he died of . . . cancer.
Once upon a time, oligarchs kept such calumnies and
strangulations below the surface, following their masters Niccolò Machiavelli’s
and Amschel Rothschild’s sage advice. But now, as befits the emerging
in-your-face style oligarchy, some of these atrocities are carried out in the
open.
There is a common misconception in progressive circles
that America had once been the land of the free and the home of the brave, and
that its decline only commenced with President Reagan. In reality, what
is happening in 2016 is merely a culmination of a centuries-long gradual march
towards fascism. I have provided numerous examples of this here, so, for now, let me give a couple of quotations from
the past (Upton Sinclair’s self-published The Brass Check, 1919):
“There was a certain labor leader in America, who was
winning a great strike. It was sought to bribe him in vain, and filially
a woman was sent after him, a woman experienced in seduction, and she
lured this man into a hotel room, and at one o’clock in the morning the
door was broken down, and the labor leader was confronted with a
newspaper story, ready to be put on the press in a few minutes.
This man had a wife and children, and had to choose between them and the
strike; he called off the strike, and the union went to pieces. This
anecdote was told to me, not by a Socialist, not by a labor agitator, but by a
well-known United States official, a prominent Catholic.”
“I cite this to show the lengths to which Big Business
will go in order to have its way. In San Francisco they raised a million
dollar fund, and with the help of their newspapers set to work deliberately to
railroad five perfectly innocent labor men to the gallows. In Lawrence,
Massachusetts, the great Woolen Trust planted dynamite in the homes of
strikebreakers, and with the help of their newspapers sought to fasten this
crime upon the union; only by an accident were these conspirators exposed, and
all but the rich one brought to justice. Do you think that ‘interests’
which would undertake such elaborate plots would stop at inventing and
circulating scandal about their enemies?
“Most certainly they did this in Denver. I was
assured by Judge Lindsey, and by James Randolph Walker, at that time chairman
of Denver’s reform organization, that the corporations of that city had a
regular bureau for such work. The head of it was a woman doctor, provided
with a large subsidy, numerous agents, and a regular card catalogue of her
victims. When someone was to be ruined, she would invent a story which
fitted as far as possible with the victim’s character and habits; and then some
scheme would be devised to enable the newspapers to print the story without
danger of libel suits.
“In extreme cases they will go as far as they did with
Judge Lindsey—hiring perjured affidavits, and getting up a fake reform
organization to give them authority. Lindsey, you understand, has made
his life-work the founding of a children’s court, which shall work by love and
not by terror. Love of children—ah, yes, all scandal-bureaus know what
that means! So they had a collection of affidavits accusing Lindsey of
sodomy. They brought the charges while he was in the East. A reporter
went to the Denver hotel where his young bride was staying, and when she
refused to see the reporter, or to hear the charges against her husband, the
reporter stood in the hallway and shouted the charges to her through the
transom, and, then went away and wrote up an interview!”
Recommended Starting References: 1. Pepper,
William, F. 2008. An Act of State: The Execution of Martin Luther King.
2. Caldwell, Taylor, 1972.Captains And The Kings (fiction).
3. People vs. the Banks. 4. Pillars of American “Democracy:”
Cloak-and-Dagger Smoking Gun Evidence.
5. Rigged Elections
Joseph Stalin reportedly said: “It is enough that the
people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide
nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.” Now that the
bankers everywhere in the Western World are ingeniously re-introducing their
version of Stalinism, following the same script in each and every country (just
to dispel any doubt about this being a coordinated attack), the Trojan Horse in
modern Western elections is the counters themselves. Such outrageous
rigging provides the bankers another safety valve, and again makes a mockery of
those who believe in electoral politics.
Recommended Starting Reference: Palast, Greg. Election Rigged for Bush.
6. Broken Promises
There is a vast gap between what a politician or a
party promise before the elections and what they deliver after the
elections. Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt, for instance, promised
peace but, once elected, served the bankers and, through guile, false-flag operations, and propaganda, led their country to catastrophic
wars. Politicians lie and get away with it, again making a mockery of the
people’s will and of ballot-box reformers.
Woodrow Wilson’s betrayal was, perhaps, the most
disastrous of them all. He not only dragged the American people to
war–against their will and on behalf of the bankers–but also broke his campaign
promises not to sell his country to the bankers:
“During the Democratic Presidential campaign, Wilson
and the rulers of the Democratic Party pretended to oppose the Aldrich
bill. As representative, Louis T. McFadden, explained twenty years later,
when he was Chairman Of The House Banking And Currency Committee (and before
the bankers silenced him forever),
‘The Aldrich Bill was condemned in the platform . . .
when Woodrow Wilson was nominated . . . the men who ruled the Democratic Party
promised the people that if they were returned to power there would be no
central bank established here while they held the reins of government.
‘Thirteen months later that promise was broken, and
the Wilson administration, under the tutelage of those sinister Wall Street
figures who stood behind Colonel House, established here in our free country
the worm-eaten monarchical institution of the ‘King’s Bank,’ to control us from
the top downward, and to shackle us from the cradle to the grave.'”
We may note in passing that, to his credit, Wilson
would later rue his betrayal:
“I’m a most unhappy man. I have ruined my
country; a great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of
credit. We’re no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a
government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the
opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”
One additional supporting example: Obama’s promise to end the neo-colonization of
Iraq. In
another example, John Perkins documents the assassination threats, blackmail,
and bribes used to turn decent elected officials into renegades.
7. Co-Option
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead
it.”
–Lenin
The men in the shadows often support phony dissident
organizations, e.g., the so-called “Tea Party” in the USA. Or, with their
limitless supply of money, they might infiltrate and achieve partial control of
a formerly genuine reform organization, e.g., the Sierra Club.
They are
thus able to control their own opposition. Also, an individual who
discovers for the first time the sorrows of the biosphere might join, say, the
Wilderness Society, and might never realize that this suit-and-tie organization
had sold out decades ago. If she uncovers the deception, she might give
up in disgust, mistakenly believing that it is just “human nature” to deceive,
look out for number one, and ignore long-term perils. And even if she
manages to find her way to a grass-roots environmental organization, she might
have only few years left to put her wisdom to good use.
This applies, in particular, to “alternative”
media. Many of these accept commercials and thus are, to a certain
extent, at someone else’s beck and call. Other media have been created,
funded, and sustained in order to throw confusion into the dissident
camp. They magnify certain issues (which pose no threat to the bankers),
thus deflecting attention from more pressing issues (e.g., Who is behind the ongoing
destruction of the middle class, the ongoing Syrian and Palestinian genocides,
the USS Liberty Massacre and cover-up, Pearl Harbor, USS Maine, 9/11, or the
Boston Marathon explosions? How in heaven’s name did the Rockefellers and
Rothschilds manage to exclude themselves from the list of the richest people in
the world? What is money? Is the Rothschild/Rockefeller Cartel doing
God’s work, as it claims, or Satan’s? Did this cartel accumulate its
wealth and power honorably, or by sleight of hand? Who really owns
British Petroleum, Monsanto, and just about any giant western corporation?).
These phony media and websites often accept the absurd
contention that our rulers never ever engage in conspiracies(relying on that standard, absurd dismissal: “She is
just a conspiracy theorist”). For them, there is no point in
investigating9/11, for the simple reason that our rulers never plot in
secret! Well, yes, the Russians, or the Chinese, or the Romans might
have, but our lily-white bankers conspiring? Are you out of your
mind? Such sites often refer to bankers’ propaganda organs (e.g., CNN,
New York Times) and to government sources as legitimate interpreters of
reality. And again, seekers of truth must laboriously sift through their
contrivances before beginning to see the world as it is.
Similarly, one of the most spectacular achievements of
the Men in the Shadows is their success in defining our leading dissidents.
Even though these “leading dissidents and intellectuals” receive financial
support from the Deep State and are actively undermining the prospects of a
revolution (the only path that can save us now), even though such “dissidents”
are conspiracy scoffers, even though such “dissidents” are not interested in
meaningful change (e.g., public central and state banks), even though they have
never risked anything for the cause of a better world, they are still regarded
as our best and brightest.
I’m writing these words, scarcely believing them
myself. My heart tells me that this is preposterous, that there cannot
possibly be people out there so vicious as to corrupt everything they touch and
to deliberately diminish goodness, health, decency, and kindness in this
world. But then my cortex takes over, providing me with multiple
proofs—both personal and research-based—that these people do exist. The
existence and ascendancy of pure evil is no conjecture, but fact. There
are people in this world who have enough ill-gotten money to last them one
thousand and one reincarnations of obscene physical comfort, but yet give
nothing, absolutely nothing, to help the thousands of children who will go
blind this year because they can’t afford $1 worth of Vitamin A. As if
this is not enough, these villains steal from these children the few centavos
they do have, and torture or kill them outright if they refuse to surrender
these centavos. A key step in planetary recovery is acknowledging the
existence of evil, its pervasiveness, and its capacity to control human
destinies.
“We must admit to ourselves that there are truly evil
geniuses out there, and in most cases these characters have taken control of
the power structure (corporations, politics and factions of the military in
most of the nations we reside in).”
Recommended Starting Reference: 1. Helvarg,
David. 2004. The War Against the Greens. 2. The Co-Option Pillar of American
“Democracy.” Part I: Why Subvert the Opposition?
Closing Remarks
Electoral participation, in any way, shape, or form is
counter-productive because it help foster the facade of participatory democracy
and the belief that piecemeal reform is possible. Also, as long as we
accept the bankers’ myth that the system can be changed peacefully from within,
the bankers and the system are safe. Some of our best people take part in
this charade either as candidates or supporters, deluding themselves that
anything at all can come from their electoral toil. Imagine all that
energy and good will channeled into a strategy that could possibly work!
Electoral politics cannot work for many reasons.
To begin with, how can we tell whether our champion is indeed our
champion? How do we know that she would prefer probable death by saying
no to the bankers to joining the fairly exclusive multimillionaire club by
saying yes? What guarantees do the people have that she will not break
every single promise?
Moreover, the vast majority of gullible voters would
believe that she is their enemy and that the bankers’ and weaponeers’
marionette is their friend. She cannot effect change because bankers can
steal and print as much money as they want, which they can give to her
opponents. In the very unlikely event that she survives all this and
becomes a threat to the bankers, they will crucify her in their media, threaten
her, offer her bribes, slander her, arrest her on false charges and keep her
naked and humiliated, without trial, in solitary confinement, in a
freezing-cold, filthy, noisy cubicle. In the still more unlikely event
that she actually receives a majority of the votes, they will doctor the
results. If she miraculously manages to overcome all this, and if nothing
else works, she will be impeached on false grounds, suicided, incinerated in
the skies or roadways, or poisoned.
She will waste time and money, and never change
anything, even if she is sincere and courageous. Since the American
people are too drugged and televised, they will not be outraged by yet one more
assassination, and will accept the bankers’ version of events. In cases
that cannot be readily forgotten, the bankers will establish a commission,
appoint its members—and then proceed to ignore subsequent reports of even these
carefully-screened commissioners that the investigation was a cover-up, a
hoax. The vast majority would still do nothing when the bankers
derisively reproduce the image of the people’s murdered champion on their fiat
money or highways.
In more general terms, putting our hopes for freedom
and for a better world in the process of electoral politics is fundamentally
ill-advised, if not immoral. We must grow up, as the Ancient Athenians did, or as the American revolutionaries did, and
provide for our own freedom and security. Our system is irreparably
broken and must be overthrown, one way or the other. The contemporary ballot box
is a bewitching siren, a mirage, a shibboleth, a bankers’ trap.
00
Moti Nissani is
professor emeritus, Wayne State University, interdisciplinarian, and compiler of A Revolutionary’s Toolkit.
A Revolutionary's Toolkit
I learned this, at least, by my experiment; that
if one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and endeavors to
live the life he has imagined, he will meet with a success unexpected in common
hours. . . . If you built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that
is where they should be. Now put the foundations under
them."
--Henry David Thoreau
A revolution cannot be won by the justice of one's
cause, by the belief that the truth will out, nor by a helter-skelter of
intuitive actions. A revolution must be planned more carefully than
a scientific experiment or a chess game, and revolutionary strategists must
educate themselves and transcend or tame their own failings. They must
understand the present system in all its complexity, grasp its weaknesses and
strengths, and develop a comprehensive strategy to defeat it. Once
fully convinced that the system is vicious and self-destructive, they must
cease to pay attention to its daily crimes against humanity and the biosphere,
let go of the hope that the system will ever reform itself, and dedicate
themselves to its overthrow.
This work-in-progress attempts to assemble a toolkit
for would-be revolutionaries, doing so through a series of articles and links. This
toolkit cannot be constructed overnight, and it is, moreover, a never-ending
project. So if you gain some insights from what you have seen here so far,
you might wish to re-visit this site every few months for updates and
revisions.
How can you take a fake dissident from a real
one? "The best way of controlling the opposition," Lenin
says, "is leading it." Many reform organizations, alternative
websites, and so-called leading dissidents in the USA and elsewhere are CIA's
or New York Times' creations, and pose a grave risk to
intellectual freedom and to a genuine revolutionary movement. These
compromised sources of dissent include the vast majority of
environmental, human rights, and all other reform organizations, dissident
websites and publications, and "leading dissidents. How then is one
to figure out that Amnesty International, the Sierra Club, Wikipedia,
or most "leading" dissident historians and intellectuals are either
seriously compromised or learned ignoramuses?
I shall have more to say about this subject
soon. In the meantime, here are a few telltale signs that should help you
uncover such sell-outs or compartmentalized fools:
Where do they get
their money?
Are they leading a life of luxury?
Do the corporate
media talk about them in a neutral fashion or do the media ignore or virulently
attack them?
Did these individuals die prematurely or spend much time in
jail?
Do they scoff at precisely the things that might wake the people
up, e.g., suggestions to abolish the Federal Reserve or to re-investigate 9/11
and the bankers' assassinations of well-known figures such the Kennedy
brothers, Martin Luther King, or John Lennon?
Do these organizations and
"dissidents" subscribe to the fiction of three branches of government
or do they explicitly recognize the existence of an Invisible Government that
controls these branches?
Do they talk about the Obamas or Clintons as the
center of real power--or about the Rockefellers and Rothschilds?
Do they
see that the present system, by its very nature, undermines morality,
freedom, justice, peace, and human survival?
Do they urge people to vote
or revolt?
Do they ever come forward with practical ways of
overthrowing the bankers, or do they confine themselves to such palliatives as
working within the system?
To embark upon this disquieting journey of betrayals
or obtuseness, read David Helvarg's War on the Greens (the
focus of that book is co-option of environmental organizations, but the same
general pattern applies to almost all major reform organizations, from Human
Rights Watch to the American Medical Association, from Columbia University to
Caltech, from the FDA to the SEC). For an introduction to the subject of
compromised or compartmentalized dissidents, watch James Corbet's Meet Noam Chomsky, Academic
Gatekeeper.
The first article in this series has already been
posted, and will be soon followed by others: The Co-Option Pillar of American
"Democracy." Part I: Why Subvert the Opposition?
Pillars of American "Democracy." Before launching a revolution, we must explore this key question: How did the bankers and their partners in crime manage to steadily increase their power and wealth at the expense of the vast majority? Eight supporting pillars have already been introduced:
- Sunshine
Bribery
- Cloak-and-Dagger:
I. Case Studies II. Smoking
Gun Evidence.
- Contrived
Terror and false-flag Operations: I. A Preview II. Backdrop of Terror III. The Gladio Conspiracy IV. 19 Telltale Signs of Fake
Terror
V. History: Read it and Learn VI. Give
me Logic or Give me Terror.
- Absence
of Real Democracy
- The Conspiracy Theory Bogeyman (2010; originally appeared here)
- Co-option (shown as The Co-Option Pillar of
American "Democracy" above)
- Banking (shown as People versus the Banks below)
The cloak-and-dagger pillar points to one key weapon
in the bankers' arsenal: Assassinations, smears, incarcerations, tortures, and
false-flag operations. This ubiquitous tactic of our rulers leads to two
conclusions of great concern to would-be revolutionaries. First, those
who openly and effectively threaten the system vanish before they can overthrow
the system. So, if revolutionaries wish to succeed, they must mimic the
bankers' and spooks' obsession with anonymity. A counter-attack on the
Cabal probably mandates an anonymous, internet-based, leaderless
revolution. Second, since the Cabal sustains itself in part by destroying
innocent lives, the belief in non-violence is playing into the Cabal's
hands. While the oligarchs kill millions and grievously endanger the
lives of billions, they imbue their subjects with the notion that violence, by
its very nature, is a one-sided affair. It's OK for them to kill two
million Iraqis and maim each and every survivor of their neo-colonization
program in that country, blow up the World Trade Center, murder Pat Tillman,
kill sitting American presidents and Senators, slaughter countless non-violent
union members and dissidents, torture, incarcerate, or kill whistle blowers and
ordinary Americans--but it is not OK for us to give them a bit of their own
medicine!
Genuine revolutionaries must let go of the naive belief that
non-violence can win a war with determined psychopaths. Revolutionaries
may wish to recall Jefferson's admonition: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed
from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
Banking.
Another pillar supporting fascism in America
is banking. Thomas Jefferson felt that "banking institutions are
more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies." Franklin Delano
Roosevelt remarked that "a financial element in the large centers
has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson." To remove
the danger and dethrone the bankers, we must understand how these producers of
nothing are gradually becoming the owners and controllers of
everything. As well, we must realize that only thoroughly bad people can
reach the top of the banking pyramid. See: People versus the Banks.
Other pillars include mind control (through propaganda
and chemicals); meticulous cohesion and long-term planning on the side of our
rulers and almost nothing on our side; human nature; rigged, controlled,
manipulated, and trivialized elections; broken election promises;
compartmentalization; an ever-stronger police state; and, finally, a system
which permits the ascendancy of psychopaths. Again, the very existence of
this very long list forcefully suggests that it will take a lot more than voting,
marching, or protesting to overthrow a suicidal system that rests on so
many powerful and mutually-supporting pillars.
Holistic Thinking. One of the most striking aspects of
the reform camp is fragmentation. There are thousands of reform
movements, each more often than not dedicated to one ill or another of the
present system, and each ignorant of the tapestry as a whole. To succeed,
revolutionaries must strive to see the whole picture. This article will
get you started: Ten Cheers for Interdisciplinarity. A more readable version is available here.
Systemic Thinking. Most analysts center their
attention on one or another rotten aspect of the political, social, and moral
landscape, not on the landscape itself. As I write, some of these good
people focus on the Fukushima nuclear disaster; others focus on the
blood-soaked neo-colonization of Ukraine; others are preoccupied with growing
income inequality in America; while still others focus on diminishing civil
liberties. A few focus on one or another larger broader aspects of
sustainability, peace, social justice, freedom, compassion, rationality, and
spirituality. Fewer still pay attention to all these inter-related
aspirations. And precious few realize that all these aspirations are
impeded by a putrid system of governance and production--a system which
sustains and strengthens itself via an interconnected set of pillars (see
above). This essay provides one example of a systemic view of
reality.
The Insanity, Needlessness, and Criminality of
Biospheric Destruction. Writing in 1992, and echoing the warnings of
earlier environmental writers, some 1,700 of the world's leading scholars,
including the majority of Nobel laureates in the sciences, issued a Warning to Humanity. They were convinced that "human beings and the
natural world are on a collision course." Here are a couple of
lead-ins to this crucial topic, showing that we could readily reverse course,
thereby helping to save our species, billions of lives, and trillions of
dollars.
- The Human Experiment is
Probably Coming to an End (Originally appeared here).
- Terror
against The Biosphere
Revolutionary Strategies I: Letting go of
Electoral Politics and Ideological Provincialism. Revolutionaries must
comprehend, first, that politics as usual cannot possibly bring meaningful
change, owing to the pillars of American "democracy" listed above and
explained in somewhat greater detail in the following link: Revolutionary Strategies I: The
Folly of Electoral Politics and the Imperative Merger of the Humanitarian Camp. This link again argues that revolutionaries
must enlarge their scope to include at least these four objectives: Freedom,
environmental sustainability, social justice, and peace.
Revolutionary Strategies II. At this late hour,
only this dismal approach seems to hold some promise: The Al-Sabbah Brigade (also available here).
Revolutionary Strategies III. Real
Democracy. Our final goal--the one we'll dream about when blood
starts flowing in the hovels, mansions, and yachts--must be real
democracy. To begin with, we must organize our own clandestine
revolutionary movement in a true democratic fashion. We must then let go
of the illusion that the system can be tweaked into compassion and
rationality. No, it must be overhauled--in the direction that has proven
itself since our hunter-gatherer days as the only political system worth dying
for. In a direct democracy, every major decision is made by the people,
without the intermediation of judges, legislators, presidents, governors,
mayors, politburo members, clergymen, or tribal chiefs. Although far from
perfect, it is the political system most likely to sustain peace, justice,
freedom, and stewardship of the biosphere. In my view, the forcible removal of
the oligarchs from power can only be justified if, at the end, their rule is
replaced by genuine democracy (=rule of the people). See: Seven Billion Cheers for Real
Democracy
Future Scenarios. 1. Extinction? 2. Environmental degradation, enslavement,
extreme inequality, and constant warfare? 3. Reasons for hope:
Re-emergence of a multi-polar world? 4. Reasons for hope: The Cabal falls
apart? (internecine fighting among bankers, tycoons, generals, and
spooks) 5. Reasons for hope: Al Sabbah-style targeting of
powerful psychopaths?
|
|
Other Suggested Readings for Would-be Revolutionaries: 1.
Stefansson, Vilhjalmur. Lessons In Living From The Stone Age. 2. Mann, Charles. The Founding Sachems. 3. Galeano, Eduardo. I Hate to Bother You. 4. Harris, Marvin. Life Without Chiefs (PDF: Are we forever condemned to a world of
haves and have-nots, rulers and ruled? ) 5. I Ain't Flying Anymore. 6. Perkins, J. Confessions of an Economic Hitman. 7. Sinclair, Upton. The Brass Check (PDF; 1919).
Revolutionary Insights: 1. The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (Heinlein) (PDF) 2. Brass-Tacks Ecology (1997). 3. Shining the Light on the
Rockefellers: Upton Sinclair's Non-Violent Reform Strategy.
Future Scenarios: 1. The People vs. the United States. 2 Will We Have to Wait for a 21st Century
Peasants' Revolt Before Seeing Any Real Change?. 3. The Four Just Men (PDF; 1905) 4. The Dispossessed (Le Guin).
No comments:
Post a Comment