By Jonas E. Alexis on January 22, 2016
"The EU needs a Putin, and not a Merkel, and by
that I do not mean a sex change operation for her. They need someone who is not
a graduate of Fantasyland University, and who can deal with real geopolitics
and be straight with their constituency, rather than acting like an
occupational force mandarin, totally disconnected from the people."
“You can give that lady here an award for having no common sense at all and for making my job easy.”
…by Jonas E. Alexis
Jewish Neocon Victoria Nuland, who is now famous for
saying “fuck the E.U.,” said last November that “85 to 90 percent of Russian air strikes in Syria have killed moderate
opposition forces and civilians and that Moscow’s intervention has done little
to stop Islamic State militants.”
This is not new at all. In 2012, New World Order
agents declared that the Russians were slaughtering civilians in Syria “on ‘an hourly
basis.’”[1] Nuland declared then:
“On a daily basis, on an hourly basis, we are seeing
Russian- and Soviet-made weaponry used against civilians in towns all across
Syria.
“Russian- and Soviet-made helicopters form the base of
the Syrian helicopter fleet. We are seeing these helicopters used all over
Syria now against civilians. We’re seeing gun mounts on these being used to
fire on populations and homes. … We’ve seen the Russians resupply the weapons
that they’ve sold to the Syrians as recently as January.”[2]
Other reports quickly followed Nuland’s Zionist
dreams.[3]
Yes, Russia has attacked many so-called moderates.
Yes, Russia has killed many U.S.-backed rebels/terrorists, who were specifically
targeting Assad.[4] But Russian forces specifically targeting Syrian
civilians? Is that really a sober thought? How is it that Syrian civilians
themselves do not agree with this Zionist narrative?
Again, how is it that Assad won the presidential
election by almost 90%?[5] Does Nuland mean to tell us that the vast
majority of Syrians could not understand that their own government was
slaughtering them? Even here, Nuland is losing logical ground.
In response to her bold accusation, Russia immediately
asked for evidence. Nothing was forthcoming. Why?
VT readers
already know the answer. Lies and fabrications flow through the veins of NWO
agents, most particularly Nuland. In response to the false accusation, Russia
Today reported:
“Reports of alleged casualties among civilians caused
by Russian airstrikes in Syria emerged even before Russian warplanes were
launched for their first combat mission, President Vladimir Putin said,
branding such reports ‘information attacks.’”[6]
Putin himself declared:
“Other nations have been bombing Syrian territory for
over a year. We have such an invitation and we intend to fight against terrorist
organizations and them only.
“As for media reports claiming that the civilian
population is suffering, we are prepared for such information attacks. The
first reports about civilian casualties emerged even before our planes got in
the air”[7]
Let us suppose that NWO agents were right, even though
the accusation was and still is, as Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has
put it, “unfounded.”[8] Let us suppose that Putin did kill civilians.
NWO agents still have to explain the fact that Putin asked the U.S. to share
information about ISIS in the first place! The U.S. refused the generous offer.
And now they are condemning Putin for killing civilians?
Balderdash!
Let us turn the table around. The U.S. military forces have recently admitted
that civilian casualties are basically part of their ideological process. Army
Colonel Steve Warren told a Pentagon briefing on Wednesday:
“Yes, we were prepared to accept civilian casualties
in conjunction with this cash strike, it’s tragic and it’s not something that
we want to do.”[9]
Just four days ago, the LA Times lamented
in an article entitled “Long after most U.S. troops have left Iraq, civilians
are dying in ‘obscene’ numbers”:
“Civilians in Iraq face ‘staggering’ violence on a
daily basis, according to a United Nations report released Tuesday, which
recorded the killings of 18,802 people and almost twice as many wounded between
the beginning of 2014 and the end of October 2015…
“Long after the end of major U.S. combat operations in
Iraq, the country continues to be torn by sectarian violence that rarely rises
to the level of daily headlines but has taken what Jan Kubis, the U.N. special
representative in the country, called an ‘obscene toll on Iraqi civilians and
their communities…’
“The violence has also displaced more than 3 million
people, a full third of them school-age children, the report says.
“It also documents a litany of abuses and human rights
violations, whether at the hands of Islamic State or the sectarian militiamen
fighting alongside the government to reclaim areas under the Sunni extremist
group’s control.
“Hundreds of children have been forced to take up arms
and fight alongside their militant captors under the threat of being ‘flogged,
tortured or raped.’”[10]
In 2014 alone,
“17,049 civilians have been recorded killed in Iraq during 2014 (up to Dec
30). This is roughly double the number recorded in 2013 (9,743), which in turn
was roughly double the number in 2012 (4,622). These numbers do not include
combatant deaths, which even by the most cautious tallies have also seen a
sharp rise in 2014.
“The conflict in Iraq that began with the US/UK
invasion of March 2003 has continued now for nearly twelve years. During this
period, not a single day has passed without Iraqi civilians being killed. The
year 2014, however, reflects an increase in violence to levels not seen since
the worst years of 2006 and 2007.
“The rise of the group Islamic State (or ISIS or ISIL)
as a major force in the conflict, as well as the military responses by the
Iraqi Government and the re-entry of US and Coalition air forces into the
conflict, have all contributed to the elevated death tolls.”
“My country didn’t sign up for this.”
Brown University put out a report saying that:
“The wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan have
taken a tremendous human toll on those countries. As of March 2015,
approximately 210,000 civilians have died violent deaths as a result of the
wars. Civilian deaths have also resulted from the US military operations in
Yemen that began in 2002.
“People living in the war zones have been killed in
their homes, in markets, and on roadways. They have been killed by bombs,
bullets, fire, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and drones.
“Civilians die at checkpoints, as they are run off the
road by military vehicles, when they step on a mine or cluster bomb, as they
collect wood or tend to their fields, and when they are kidnapped and executed
for purposes of revenge or intimidation. They are killed by the United States,
by its allies, and byinsurgents and sectarians in the civil wars spawned by the
invasions.
“Death can also happen weeks or months after a battle.
Many times more Iraqis, Afghans, and Pakistanis have died as a result of
battered infrastructure and poor health conditions arising from the wars than
directly from its violence.
“For example, war refugees often lose access to a
stable food supply or to their jobs, resulting in increased malnutrition and
vulnerability to disease.
“The Costs of War reports document the direct and
indirect toll that war takes on civilians and their livelihoods, including the
lingering effects of war death and injury on survivors and their families.”
“Yes, I admit it. I’m a political prostitute. But
there are many of us out there, so it can’t be wrong.”
Keep in mind that Iraq is the place where Nuland and
her brethren invaded in 2003. Keep in mind that NWO agents and their puppets
unanimously declared that the invasion was true freedom. No exaggeration here.
Listen to political prostitute Ann Coulter: “The
magnificently successful Iraq War has been rewritten as a failure…”[11] In Iraq, Ms. Whore continues, “We had won,
executed a dictator, presided over democratic elections, and killed loads of al
Qaeda fighters.”[12]
The only way Coulter could get away with saying crazy
things like this is because she has deliberately refused to look at the
substantial evidence which literally debunks her essentially Zionist ideology.[13] After all, she is making millions of dollars
saying weird things, and decent Americans are buying those weird things like
cheesecake.
To go back to our main point, should we pay NWO agents attention when they
brazenly and promiscuously declare that Putin is “willing to flirt with
lawlessness in his global ventures”?[14]
Perhaps we should allow Mr. Putin to speak for
himself. After he intellectually humiliated a BBC reporter on
the question of whether Russia is actually pursuing an aggressive expansion,
Putin told the poor guy quite frankly: “Have you any common sense?”
In other words, “Are you stupid or a complete idiot?”
An idiot, as we all know, is a person who lacks normal intelligence or a person
who fails to apply common sense to the real world, sometimes for moral and
political reasons.
Are NWO agents idiots? No, they are worse than that.
Some people are idiots because they do not know what they are doing. Those
people can be forgiven.
But NWO agents know exactly that they are violating
the moral order and practical reason. As Jewish Neocon Jonah Goldberg
himself said:
“Every ten years or so, the United States needs to
pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to
show the world we mean business.”[15]
In 2003, the United States picked up “some small
crappy little country and throw it against the wall,” and that country turned
out to be Iraq. Then it was Afghanistan. Then Libya. What was next on the list?
Obviously it was Syria, but NWO agents are facing a
stumbling block there. Obviously Putin is kicking their butts. And they do not
like it when a small but significant country like Russia has been in the
business of butt kicking for more than a year.
Every country in Europe, most specifically Germany,
needs a Putin to get involved in that business. Angela Merkel is obviously
useless in this regard. As Jim W. Dean beautifully put it a few days ago:
“The EU needs a Putin, and not a Merkel, and by that I
do not mean a sex change operation for her. They need someone who is not a
graduate of Fantasyland University, and who can deal with real geopolitics and
be straight with their constituency, rather than acting like an occupational
force mandarin, totally disconnected from the people.”
[1] Chris McGreal, “US says Russian-made weapons are
killing Syrians on ‘an hourly basis,’” Guardian, June 12, 2012.
[2] Ibid.
[3] See Adam Withnall, “Russia ‘directly targets
civilians’ in Syria, killing at least 200 in possible war crimes, Amnesty
report reveals,” Independent, December 23, 2015; Paul Armstrong,
“Hundreds of civilians killed in Russian airstrikes in Syria – Amnesty,” CNN,
December 23, 2015.
[4] Raziye Akkoc and Roland Oliphant, “’Russia kills
US-backed Syrian rebels in second day of air strikes as Iran prepares for
ground offensive,’” Telegraph, October 2, 2015.
[5] “Bashar al-Assad wins re-election in Syria as
uprising against him rages on,” Guardian, June 4, 2014; “Landslide
Win for Assad in Syria’s Presidential Elections,” Haaretz, June 4,
2014; “Bashar Assad wins Syria presidential election with 88.7% of vote,” Russia
Today, June 4, 2014.
[6] “Putin: Claims Russian jets killed civilians in
Syria emerged before airstrikes started,” Russia Today, October 1,
2015.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Avaneesh Pandey, “Russia Rejects ‘Unfounded’
Accusations Of Civilian Deaths In Syria Airstrikes,” International
Business Times, October 1, 2015.
[9] Idrees Ali, “Recent strike targets Mosul ‘cash
collection point’: U.S. military,” Reuters, January 20, 2016.
[10] Nabih Bulos, “Long after most U.S. troops have
left Iraq, civilians are dying in ‘obscene’ numbers,” LA Times,
January 19, 2016.
[11] Ann Coulter, Never Trust a Liberal Over
3-Especially a Republican (Washington: Regnery Publishing, 2013), 3.
[12] Ibid., 14.
[13] For studies on this, see for example Stefan Halper
and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the
Global Order (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004); Murray
Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the
Shaping of Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2004); John J. Mearsheimer, Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in
International Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011); John
M. Schuessler, Deceit on the Road to War: Presidents, Politics, and American
Democracy (New York: Cornell University Press, 2015); Paul R. Pillar, Intelligence
and U.S. Foreign Policy: Iraq, 9/11, and Misguided Reform (New York:
Columbia University Press, 2011); John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The
Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy(New York: Farrar & Straus, 2007).
[14] “Mr. Putin and the Poisonous London Tea Party,” NY
Times, January 21, 2016.
[15] Conor Friedersdorf, “The Real Radicals of the
Iraq War: Its Proponents,” Atlantic, March 6, 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment