“Boots on the Ground” Inside Syria? The Pentagon Comes
to the Rescue of the “Islamic State” (ISIS)
Global Research, October 28,
2015
Region: Middle East & North Africa
Theme: US NATO War Agenda
On October 27, US
Defense Secretary Ashton Carter announced that the Pentagon is
contemplating “direct action on the ground” in both Iraq and
Syria, “in an effort to combat the self-proclaimed Islamic State terrorist
group.” (Sputnik, October 27, 2015).
The not so hidden agenda,
however, is not “to combat” but rather “to protect and come to the
rescue” of the Islamic State terrorist group.
What’s new? Are we
witnessing a process of military escalation?
The US and its allies already
have boots on ground inside Syria. It’s not official, it’s a so-called
“covert operation” which everybody knows about.
The Pentagon together with
NATO, Turkey and Israel, et al, have routinely dispatched their military
advisers, special forces and intelligence operatives to the Syrian war theater.
These foreign forces have operated within rebel ranks from the outset of the
war on Syria in March 2011.
While neither Washington nor
the mainstream media have “officially” acknowledged their presence inside
Syria, it should be understood that these Western special forces have
performed routine command functions within the various terrorist
groups in liaison with the US-NATO led coalition. In other words, they are
largely responsible for coordinating countless ISIS and Al Nusrah terrorist
operations against civilians inside Syria on behalf of the US led coalition.
Needless to say, they are also supported by the US led air campaign, which
theoretically is targeting (rather than “protecting”) the terrorists.
“Responsibility to Protect”. R2P The Terrorists
In response to Russia’s
bombing raids against ISIS, Washington is now contemplating to announce
“officially” (what they have been doing for the last four) their resolve to have
boots on the ground in an extended military operation. Needless to say,
this operation, if it were to be carried out without the UN Security Council
stamp of approval would constitute a violation of international law
(Nuremberg).
The US administration is
considering the possibility of deploying a small number of ground forces in
Syria embedded among Kurdish troops or the “moderate” opposition, The Wall
Street Journal reported Wednesday, citing US officials.
The US military has also
proposed sending a group of combat advisers to the front lines
with the Iraqi army, and possibly also with Syrian rebels. This
proposal is, nevertheless, qualified by the newspaper as a less
likely scenario.
Moreover, the White House is
to examine the option of deploying a small squadron of Apache
attack helicopters to Iraq to step up the fight against the
Islamic State, the newspaper said. The measure will entail deploying several
hundred US servicemen to Iraq, according to the daily. Washington
heads a coalition that has been conducting airstrikes on ISIL positions in Syria
and Iraq since 2014.On Tuesday, US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said
the Pentagon had not ruled out conducting attacks on the ground
against ISIL terrorists. (Sputnik, October 28, 2015)
A No Fly Zone
Another important
development pertains to the statement by Defense Secretary Ashton Carter that
while “a no fly zone” is not contemplated in the immediate future by the
Pentagon, it nonetheless remains an option: “President Barack Obama has not
taken the option of a Syrian no-fly zone ‘off the table’”.
Meanwhile, Qatar has
announced that it is contemplating sending ground troops to Syria. This
statement announced by Doha was in all likelihood formulated in
Washington. According Qatar’s Foreign Minister Khalid al-Attiyah, Qatar could
intervene military in response to Russia’s intervention in support of the
government of Bashar Al Assad. (CNN Arabic (October 21):
“Anything that
protects the Syrian people and Syria from partition, we will not spare any
effort to carry it out with our Saudi and Turkish brothers, no matter
what this is,”
From the outset, Qatar has
acted as a US proxy. Together with Saudi Arabia it has contributed to the
recruitment, training and financing of Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists inside
Syria including ISIS and Al Nusrah.
We are at a dangerous crossroads
International diplomacy has
collapsed. US foreign policy makers are ignorant and corrupt, unaware of the
implications of their actions.
The US led air raids are
being implemented simultaneously with those of Russia.
Stalemate at the UN. The UN
Secretary General Ban ki-Moon (appointed by Washington ) supports the US led
war under a humanitarian banner.
These various actions and
threats by the US led coalition –not to mention the chatter pertaining to a
“World War III option” in the corridors of the US Congress– point
to a scenario of military escalation,which could potentially lead to direct
military confrontation between the US led coalition and the Russian
Federation.
Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment