By F. William Engdahl
16 September 2019
Image credits: U.S. Department of Agriculture NRCS photo - Public domain but
use of appropriate byline/photo/image credits is requested.https://www.usda.gov/policies-and-links
The
American farm sector is undergoing its worst crisis since the 1980’s. Extreme
snow and then unusually heavy rainfall across the Midwest farm belt this spring
and summer have severely delayed or reduced crop plantings. That comes after
several years of falling farm income. A US EPA series of waivers to the oil
industry then sharply cut the market for corn ethanol. To make matters worse,
in retaliation for Trump Administration tariffs on China goods, China has
halted all import of US farm products. All this comes as US farmers struggle
with record high debt with bankruptcies spreading. Some compare the situation
to the crises of the Great Depression in agriculture. Farm production has long
been a major pillar of the US economy and exports. Could this little-noted farm
crisis become a factor that could determine if Donald Trump wins or loses
re-election in 2020 ?
The
Ethanol Fiasco
At a
time when farm income has fallen dramatically over the past several years, the
Trump Environmental Protection Administration just dealt a further severe blow
to the market for corn used to produce ethanol for E10 fuels. On August 9, the
EPA announced that it had approved 31 of its 38 pending small refinery
exemptions, allowing the oil refiners to avoid mandatory blending of gasoline
with corn ethanol. The approvals were retroactive to 2018, in violation of the
Biofuels law, and allowed oil refiners to evade mandatory blending of more than
1 billion gallons of corn-based ethanol, a huge blow to US corn growers.
To make
matters worse, the pro-oil Trump EPA, first under Scott Pruitt, a strong backer
of the oil industry, and now his successor, Andrew Wheeler, a former lobbyist
for the coal industry, have granted a record number of oil refiner exemptions
including to companies like Chevron and ExxonMobil, in direct violation of a
law intended to help only small distressed refiners. The exemptions are to date
some four times what was exempted under the Obama administration resulting in a
major loss of corn ethanol consumption.
Acting
retroactively, the EPA granted the equivalent of over 4 billion gallons of
ethanol exemptions for the period 2016 through 2018, equivalent to losing a 1.4
billion bushel corn crop, the entire annual harvest of Minnesota, a major corn
state. The US ethanol lobby organizations are demanding the Trump
Administration restore that lost ethanol volume as required by law. Emily Skor,
CEO of Growth Energy, an ethanol association, stated, “More biofuel plants are
closing their doors with each passing week, and farm families have run out of
options. The EPA must take immediate action to restore lost demand under the
2020 biofuel targets and repair the damage from abusive refinery exemptions
granted to oil giants like Exxon and
Chevron.”
The
growing of corn to produce ethanol for blending with gasoline for fuel additive
has become a major prop of US agriculture since the Bush Administration
proposed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 which amended the Clean Air Act,
requiring the EPA to mandate annual volumes of biofuel, mostly corn ethanol, to
be blended with gasoline fuel, heating oil or jet fuel. The growth of the US
ethanol production has been such that today almost 40% of all US corn grown is
for ethanol.Most USA gasoline today is E10 with 10% ethanol. Today the USA is
the world’s largest corn producer by far, almost doublenumber two, China.
The EPA
waivers to the oil industry have dealt a big blow to US corn farmers across the
Midwest states, especially Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Nebraska and Indiana. To
date the Trump Administration has made several gestures to address the loss of
ethanol markets for corn farmers. But the farmers and ethanol associations
claim it is far too little. Notably, in Iowa during the 2016 campaign, Trump
pledged to protect the Renewable Fuel Standard of 2005, which mandates a
certain amount of biofuel added to the fuel supply each year. Many farmers feel
betrayed by the EPA.
The
White House is now caught between its heavy support to the oil industry, a
major campaign donor source, and to the farm belt, the heart of the trump “Make
America Great Again” popular support in 2016 and critical to a re-election in
2020.
The
ethanol EPA rulings are by no means the only actions farmers see as a negative
coming from the White House. The China trade war has also dealt a huge blow to
US farm exports.
China
trade
Before
the Trump China trade disputes, US ethanol producers were optimistic that the
China market could be a major growth area as China increased efforts to deal
with air pollution. China ethanol imports from the US were rising steadily
until early 2018, when the Trump administration escalated its tariff wars and
China reacted by targeting the US farm sector, raising ethanol import tariffs
by July 2018 to70%. That essentially killed the China ethanol market for US corn
farmers and ethanol producers. The US exports are being
replaced by those from Brazil, a major producer of ethanol from sugar cane.
But loss
of China ethanol exports has been a relatively minor part of the China damage
to US agriculture. With pinpoint precision, Beijing has targeted their
counter-measures to the Trump trade actions in the politically important US
farm sector. Notable is that Xi Jinping spent some months in Iowa in his
younger years in an exchange program, and knows the US farm region better than
many foreign heads of state.
In early
August China’s government reportedly ordered its state purchasing companies to
stop imports of all us agriculture products after US President Trump announced
he would order added 10% tariffs on another $300 billion in China imports as of
September 1. Before that China had already cut imports of US soybeans to ten
year lows.
In 2017
before the trade war began in earnest, China imported 19 million tons of US
soybeans worth some $12 billion, some 60% of US total soybean production. China
was the largest export market for US soybean farmers, a major sector of US
farming. Soybean exports to China were the main export for Iowa agriculture.
All told US agriculture exports to China before the trade war were estimated at
nearly $20 billion. Since 2012 China had been the largest market for US
agriculture exports. Now that is all but gone, a staggering blow to US farmers
at a time they can ill
afford it.
Compounding
Problems
The loss
of the ethanol market for corn due to the Trump EPA combined with the latest
loss of the China agriculture export market would be grave but manageable
except for the fact they hit at a time when American farmers are in precarious
conditions. Record rainfall across the farm belt in the US Midwest earlier this
season has meant a heavy reduction in both acres planted and yields for
especially corn and soybeans. The government’s USDA estimate of the current US
corn crop in “good-to-excellent” condition, as well as for soybeans, is the
lowest since 2013.
For
various reasons farm net income has dropped dramatically. US wheat prices since
2012 have dropped by some 50%. Corn prices are down by more than 50% since
2013. Net farm income is down in 2019 so far by 35% from its 2013 peak. This is
before the impact of the current grain shortfall from flooding and the China
and ethanol effects are weighed.
High
Debt
Unfortunately,
all this hits the American farm family at a time of near record debt. While net
farm income has moved lower over much of the past decade, farm debt has risen
significantly. The average farm debt as of beginning 2018 had risen to $1.3
million per farm, most long term. The current conjuncture of farm crises is
leading to rising bankruptcies. With the Federal Reserve raising interest rates
the past two years it is increasingly difficult for farmers to refinance the
debt in hopes of better times. The result is rising bankruptcies.Already in
2018 net farm income fell to 12 year lows. This year 2019
is set to be far worse.
It is
not surprising that some farmers are beginning to rethink their earlier backing
for the Trump presidency. Roger Johnson, president of the National Farmers
Union noted in a radio interview end of August that it will take “decades” to
reverse damage caused by Trump farm and trade policies. China, he added, is now
a “lost market” for American farmers because of Trump’s trade war. Johnson
added, “Farmers are in a lot of financial stress right now; net farm income is
half of what it was six years ago. This is really tough. We’re in a
really, really
difficult spot right now.”
Ethanol
producer Nick Bowdish, CEO of Elite Octane in Atlantic, Iowa, backed Trump in
2016 in part because he supported taking on China. Recently he said, “Since he
got himself involved in agricultural policy issues, it has been a complete
disappointment to any of us out here in the heartland.” He added in a Newsweek
interview, “Where the president went wrong and made a serious misstep was when
he made the decision to start destroying the market for agricultural products
at home with these refinery waivers.” That he noted hit farmers just when they
were being hard hit by the trade war with China, “… and
that’s not acceptable.”
It‘s
still some four months until the first Presidential primary and the outcome at
this point is far from clear. Indications are that most farmers still back
Trump, though that is weakening after the latest setbacks from China trade and
ethanol. Now there are hints that China is willing to make a deal on soybeans
in return for trade concessions from Trump. That might be a needed boost for
the Trump farm support if it happens. The first 2020 Presidential primary is in
February. It’s in Iowa…
F.
William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in
politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and
geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern
Outlook”
No comments:
Post a Comment