by Bob
Singer
Warning:
Reading the following may be hazardous to your mental health. The material
herein has caused readers to experience Cognitive Dissonance (CD). CD is the
discomfort felt at the discrepancy between what you already know or believe,
and new information or interpretation that contradicts a strongly held belief
system – It’s that queasy feeling that rises in your gut and screams, I DON’T
BELIEVE THAT! Because, if you accepted the new information, you would have to
admit you been ”had,” or ”conned,” in this case into shopping for stuff to
trash the planet.
The
benefit of the new information is that the world around you will finally make
sense. Hot, flat, and crowded Thomas L. Friedman will finally know what planet
George W. Bush is on. Bush lost the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq, but
is winning the war on the environment.
At this
point, it is advantageous to consider the efforts of writer Andrew Hitchcock,
author of The History of the House of Rothschild:
“The
Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very long time, their
tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily lives, and are the hidden
hand behind all the social cataclysms in history.”
The
French and American Revolution, the Civil War, World Wars, the Industrial
Revolution, the Federal Reserve and our consumer society. Rothschild policies
include “total ruthlessness” and as Frederic Morton writes in the Preface to
“The Rothschild’s,” “For the last one hundred and fifty years, the history of
the House of Rothschild has been to an amazing degree the backstage history of
Western Europe…. The overwhelming success of the Rothschild’s lay in their
willingness to do what had to be done.”
What
follows is the history that has been intentionally left out of our textbooks.
The historical research by Toqueville, Chartier and Hitchcock if examined
without prejudice supports a prima facie case that the House of Rothschild
orchestrated the French and American Revolutions to create the middle class
(consumers) for the purpose of trashing the planet.
Our
last President Bush, connected to the House of Rothschild Global Financial
Empire, was deadly serious when, after rejecting the global climate change
targets of the July 2008 G8 summit, he said, “Goodbye, from the (then) world’s
biggest polluter.” [1]
“Things
do not happen. Things are made to happen.” John F. Kennedy
In the
early 20th century historians (such as Charles Beard), looking for the social
forces they thought controlled history, emphasized industrialization and
urbanization. These were forces unleashed by the industrial revolution and the
textile industry. [2] By the mid 20th century, attention turned to the broader
concept of “modernization,” which included industrialization, urbanization,
psychological changes and changes in values. Eric Hobsbawm called
“modernization” (Consumerism), “probably the most important event in human
history.”
Consumerism
Needs the Middle Class
If you
were living in the 18th century looking for humans to consume the resources of
the planet where would you find them?
Answer:
95-97 percent of the population of Feudal Society. The “Third Estate” had
potential consumers but first they would need to be “enlightened” with a
philosophy and movement based on respect for the dignity of man, concern for
his welfare, and the creation of favorable conditions for a just social life.
Men
began to think government was not something kings exercised by divine right and
then Maximilien Robespierre started the French Revolution. The order was given
to Robespierre in book form by Rothschild’s agent Adam Weishaupt and his
associate Xavier Zwack. [3]
At the
beginning of the Revolution, Kings, Monarchs and the despots of our history
books held supreme power; by the time it ended, the human rights movement
replaced centuries of tyranny and oppression for the common man.
Is that
possible?
Revisionists
are still trying to explain why the despots of our history books wouldn’t use
the Guillotine to dispense with such a heretical movement.
Roger
Chartier writes in The Cultural Origins of The French Revolution, the popular
notion that the Enlightenment caused the Revolution makes the mistake of post
hoc ergo propter hoc – “after the fact, therefore because of the fact.” Thus,
Chartier and other historians claim it was the French Revolution that made the
Enlightenment.
The
Declaration of the Rights of Man is often seen as the quintessential
Enlightenment document but the declaration called for a meritocratic social
order, not an egalitarian one. Equality was conspicuously absent.
The
revisionists are consistent in dismissing the Marxist interpretation, but
without a 20th century perspective on environmental damage they have no
systemic theory explaining the events in late 18th century France. Ecocide was
a pivotal and necessary part of the Rothschild plan for a New World Order.
Liberté,
Egalité, Fraternité
In the
summer of 1789 when France rose up in revolt it wasn’t over intellectual,
social or political issues; it was food. The country was in the midst of a
famine caused by abnormal weather.
The
common man was having trouble developing his natural talent and potential
because he was hungry.
“The
French Revolution will only be the darkness of night to those who see it in
isolation; only the times which preceded it will give the light to illuminate
it.” The whole social edifice of Ancien Regime France collapsed at a single
blow, and the fact that this was in the midst of one of the worst El Niño
episodes of the millennium is something that should be taken into account when
examining this history.” Alexis de Tocqueville 1952, p. 249
September
11, 1814 should be examined as well. [4]
The
rise of humanism and the social injustices in the 18th century did not create
the revolutionary brew that saw the overthrow of the French monarchy. The House
of Rothschild and the weather changed the course of history.
When
the French government on the verge of bankruptcy from the seven years wars was
unable to provide famine relief, public frustration erupted into violent
demonstrations and the French Revolution.
Of
course most despots would call for an inquisition and blame the peasants for
the worst El Niño episode in history.
In 1795
when the people rebelled against a provision of the National Convention,
Napoleon simply fired “a whiff of grape shot” into the mob, and the rebellion
was over. [5]
Why did
the House of Rothschild allow the revolution to succeed?
Answer:
There were not enough consumers in the First and Second Estates in 18th century
Feudal Society to weaken the planet.
The
House of Rothschild Global Financial Empire
The
vast accumulation of wealth, financial and natural resources of the House of
Rothschild is legendary.
“And
there was no news more precious than the (predetermined) outcome at Waterloo…”
Considered
the turning point in history, exploiting the Battle of Waterloo gave the
Rothschild family complete financial control of Europe, and soon after, the
world. England would set up a new Bank of England, with Nathan Mayer Rothschild
in control.
According
to one source in the late 1800s, when the planet was still in ecological
balance, “it was estimated the House of Rothschild controlled almost half the
wealth of the world” [6]
That
would be real wealth: raw materials, commodities, copper, iron ore, petroleum,
lead, copper, silver and gold.
How
much are they worth today?
Almost
half of the world’s fiat wealth about $500 trillion of the fiat currency
(monopoly money) they created out of thin air to finance our consumer society.
[7]
And
their real wealth, where is it now?
Used
up, as in consumed, by the middle class so former members of the Third Estate
(serfs and slaves) could have houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs—the affordable
things we take for granted which put the planet on the bridge to Ecocide.
One of
the more absurd notions that found its way into the history books and the
writings of economic experts, is that somehow the International Bankers
(swindlers and scoundrels of history) were made wealthier accumulating the
monopoly money they printed.
The
swindlers and scoundrels wealth, not yours or mine, was eventually “cut, mined
and hauled away,” so that Americans could have that cheap stuff that is
currently “trashing the planet”.
During
the last 100 years those swindlers were able to distort the structure of
relative prices; generate misallocations of labor and capital throughout the
economy; rationalize new governmental interventions in the face of the market
“instability” manipulate the patterns of and the profits from international
trade which resulted in the Industrial Revolution, the Great Depression, the
stagflation of the 1970’s, the dot-com and the housing market bubbles…which
resulted in unprecedented prosperity for the middle class… and $500 trillion of
monopoly money for the House of Rothschild.
Did
Woodrow Wilson “ruin his country” when he signed The Federal Reserve Act of
1913 and made the middle class prosperous beyond precedent in the most powerful
nation in the world?
Yes,
because prosperous beyond precedent was unprecedented environmental damage for
the planet.
Capitalism
never made sense unless the goal was ecocide.
The
ideal and the principle of the market economy of Capitalism was never
fulfilled.
What is
called capitalism is a distorted, twisted and deformed system of increasingly
limited market relationships as well as market processes hampered and repressed
by state controls and regulations. And overlaying this entire system are the
ideologies of 18th-century mercantilism, 19th-century socialism, and
20th-century welfare statism.
Professor
Ebeling, the Ludwig von Mises professor of Economics at Hillsdale College, understood
something was wrong when he wrote: “the perverse development and evolution of
historical capitalism, the institutions necessary for a truly free-market
economy have been either undermined or prevented from emerging.”
But
when he claimed, “it is the principles and the meaning of a free-market economy
that must be rediscovered” in order to overcome the burden of historical
capitalism and save liberty, He should have written principles must be
rediscovered in order to save the planet from ecocide.
It
didn’t matter if we listened to Keynes, Friedman or Mises; or for that matter
anyone from the Rothschild-funded Austrian School of Economics, consumerism
never made economic, environmental, or common sense. [8]
Even
conscious consumers consume, as in use up the resources of the planet.
Revolution
The
American and French Revolutions made consumers out of 97% of the population who
could now afford, thanks to those scoundrels behind the Federal Reserve, their
own castle with all the furnishings and a two-car garage for their mobile
pollution devices – the personal automobile. [9]
Let me
repeat, since 1910 the House of Rothschild and the Rockefellers have exchanged
their real wealth for 600 trillion of fiat currency (monopoly money) they
printed so former members of the Third Estate (serfs and slaves) could have
houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs—the “stuff” which put the planet on the bridge
to Ecocide.
The
only thing dumber is when a poor person in the People’s Republic of China loans
about $4,000 to everyone in the (rich) USA. [10]
Rockefeller
philanthropy wasn’t limited to dimes.
Footnotes
[1] If
“trashing the planet” was his military objective, our last President Bush was
not stupid, but a brilliant commander-in-chief waging an all-out war on
biodiversity, animals and rainforests. He wanted to drill in the ANWR to trash
America’s last Arctic Wilderness. Sonar Testing is about torturing whales and
dolphins. And the Border Fence that keeps everything out but illegal’s will
disrupt an extraordinary source of biological diversity along the 2,000-mile
long region.
[2] By
1850 the United States following the lead of England built their own industrial
revolution around textiles. There arose a great demand for the one crop that
does more damage to the environment than planting coffee or even tobacco…
Cotton. Today, our planet is in desperate trouble. Earth is suffocating as
large tracts of rain forests disappear. Pollution, poisons and chemicals are
killing the planet. These problems could have been avoided if the British
textile industry hadn’t “suddenly” discovered Cotton.
[3] The
History of the House of Rothschild by Andrew Hitchcock, The Establishment By
Ted Lang, Rothschild Timeline – iamthewitness.com
[4] El
Niño and mankind before the 20th century by ELinacre,
August
25, 1814, British troops captured the nation’s capital during the War of 1812,
setting fire to buildings in retaliation for American wins. A tornado struck as
the government buildings burned, killing 30 soldiers and many local residents.
One British historian noted, “More British soldiers were killed and wounded by
this stroke of nature than from all the firearms the American troops had
mustered in the ineffectual defense of the city.” The account in “Washington
Weather” tells of a British admiral who asked a local woman whether the storm
was typical of the weather “in this infernal country.” The lady told him that
it was a storm specially sent by God “to drive our enemies from the city.”
September 11, 1814 the decisive battle of the War of 1812.
“Washington
Weather” at weatherbook.com/1814.htm,
Did a
tornado wreak havoc on the War of 1812? By Kevin Myatt,
Tornadoes:
library.thinkquest.org/C003603/english/tornadoes/casestudies.shtml
[5] The
World Book Encyclopedia
[6] The
Power Of The Rothschilds By Fritz Springmeier (Excerpt – Bloodlines of the
Illuminati, The History of the House of Rothschild by Andrew Hitchcock
[7] The
Zionist Connection – An Unholy Tripartite by Ted Lang
[8]
From the Congress of Vienna (September 1814 to June 1815) came the phrases
“Austrian School of Politics”, and the “Austrian School of Economics” presently
epitomized by Milton Friedman, in which Rothschild financial schemes are used
to carry out Rothschild political goals. The History of the House of Rothschild
by Andrew Hitchcock
[9] The
Automobile and the Environment in American History by Martin V. Melosi
[10]
The $1.4 Trillion Question by James Fallows
No comments:
Post a Comment