The Two Centers of Unaccountable Power in America
15 June 13
here
are two great centers of unaccountable power in the American
political-economic system today - places where decisions that
significantly affect large numbers of Americans are made in secret, and
are unchecked either by effective democratic oversight or by market
competition.
One goes by the name of the "intelligence community"
and its epicenter is the National Security Agency within the Defense
Department. If we trusted that it reasonably balanced its snooping on
Americans with our nation's security needs, and that our elected
representatives effectively oversaw that balance, there would be little
cause for concern. We would not worry that the information so gathered
might be misused to harass individuals, thereby chilling free speech or
democratic debate, or that some future government might use it to
intimidate critics and opponents. We would feel confident, in other
words, that despite the scale and secrecy of the operation, our privacy,
civil liberties, and democracy were nonetheless adequately protected.
But the NSA has so much power, and oversight of it is
so thin, that we have every reason to be concerned. The fact that its
technological reach is vast, its resources almost limitless, and its
operations are shrouded in secrecy, make it difficult for a handful of
elected representatives to effectively monitor even a tiny fraction of
what it does. And every new revelation of its clandestine "requests" for
companies to hand over information about our personal lives and
communications further undermines our trust. To the contrary, the NSA
seems to be literally out of control.
The second center of unaccountable power goes by the
name of Wall Street and is centered in the largest banks there. If we
trusted that market forces kept them in check and that they did not
exercise inordinate influence over Congress and the executive branch, we
would have no basis for concern. We wouldn't worry that the Street's
financial power would be misused to fix markets, profit from insider
information, or make irresponsible bets that imperiled the rest of us.
We could be confident that despite the size and scope of the giant
banks, our economy and everyone who depends on it were nonetheless
adequately protected.
But those banks are now so large (much larger than
they were when they almost melted down five years ago), have such a
monopolistic grip on our financial system, and exercise so much power
over Washington, that we have cause for concern. The fact that not a
single Wall Street executive has been held legally accountable for the
excesses that almost brought the economy to its knees five years ago and
continues to burden millions of Americans, that even the Attorney
General confesses the biggest banks are "too big to jail," that the big
banks continue to make irresponsible bets (such as those resulting in JP
Morgan Chase's $6 billion "London Whale" loss), and that the Street has
effectively eviscerated much of the Dodd-Frank legislation intended to
rein in its excesses and avoid another meltdown and bailout, all offer
evidence that the Street is still dangerously out of control.
It is rare in these harshly partisan times for the
political left and right to agree on much of anything. But the reason, I
think, both are worried about the encroachments of the NSA on the
privacy and civil liberties of Americans, as well as the depredations of
"too big to fail or jail" Wall Street banks on our economy, is
fundamentally the same: It is this toxic combination of inordinate power
and lack of accountability that renders both of them dangerous,
threatening our basic values and institutions.
That neither Republicans nor Democrats have done much
of anything to effectively rein in these two centers of unaccountable
power suggests that, if there is ever to be a viable third party in
America, it will may borne of the ill-fated consequences.
Robert B. Reich, Chancellor's Professor of Public
Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of
Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the
ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has
written thirteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock" and "The
Work of Nations." His latest is an e-book, "Beyond Outrage." He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.
No comments:
Post a Comment