Free Pages: EN — LARRY ROMANOFF: Jews are Destroying Western Society – Part 7

Saturday, September 5, 2026

EN — LARRY ROMANOFF: Jews are Destroying Western Society – Part 7 — The Jewish Revolution in Hungary

Jews are Destroying Western Society – Part 7

By Larry Romanoff

On 21 March 1919, the Magyar Tanácsköztársaság, the Hungarian Republic of Councils, was proclaimed. It lasted for just 133 days, until 1 August 1919.

The Hungarian Revolution

There is a part of Hungary’s history that seems to receive little attention, this being the takeover of the country by the Jewish Communists led by Béla Kun, who had been actively involved with the Jewish Bolshevik atrocities in Russia.

The Jewish revolution against Hungary in 1919 established a blueprint for using sex education as a weapon of cultural annihilation. The ultimate goal was the destruction of the family, religion, and the entire moral foundations of Hungarian society, paving the way for totalitarian (and fascist) control by Jews. Béla Kun and György Lukács were the primary figures behind the cultural and sexual revolution in Hungary. Both were Jews.

This essay provides additional documentation that the destruction of the Western family has been a coordinated, long-term agenda of the Khazar Jews. This historical example, added to those which precede and follow, demonstrates that the systematic destruction of the Western family using sexual depravity as the main tool, is a deliberate and long-term strategy that has been implemented for over a century. The actions of Béla Kun and György Lukacs in Hungary provide considerable evidential reinforcement of this thesis.

The attempt of the Jews to destroy Hungary follows closely their attempts in Russia, although their “reign” in Hungary was much shorter, as were their successes in Germany. These examples provide a clear historical precedent for the Jew’s systematic use of sexual “education” as a tool for social and cultural destruction. Their policies were not about health or liberation. They were a calculated assault on the family, the church, and traditional morality, designed to atomise the population for total state control. This aligns directly with the broader agenda I have identified in previous essays in this series.

In November 1918, Bela Kun, with several hundred other Jewish Hungarian Communists, and with huge financing from the Jews in Russia, returned to Hungary and formed the Hungarian Communist Party. [1] Kun got himself into power by feigning a coalition, but then immediately betrayed it and proclaimed a dictatorship with himself as dictator. One of his first decrees was to nationalise almost all private property and to announce that private commerce would be punished with the death penalty. Placards were immediately placed throughout Budapest that commanded all commercial and industrial establishments to close for three days, during which time they were to make an accurate and exhaustive inventory and deliver it to the government, under penalty of death. [2] He then confiscated and nationalised all industry and land.

Hungary at the time was in a weak position. When the Austro-Hungarian monarchy dissolved after the First World War and Hungary was declared a republic, the political changes brought chaos from all quarters. For one thing, Hungary lost two-thirds of its territory, with only 93,000 square kilometers remaining of the original 325,000. Hungary also lost two-thirds of its population. Only 8 million remained from an original total of 21 million.

The Jewish revolution against Hungary and Hungarian society was “extraordinarily malevolent and widespread”. Béla Kun’s Jews, imported from Russia, carried out appalling atrocities during their tenure of power. “Red Tribunals” arbitrarily condemned many hundreds of prominent Hungarians to death. About a month after the Jews seized power, Hungarian citizens organised an anti-revolutionary coup against Kun’s regime. The attempt failed, and Kun conducted a brutal and vicious response now termed “The Red Terror”, with widespread atrocities and summary executions carried out by his “secret police” whose units consisted almost entirely of Jews.

The logic of the Jew’s societal destruction in Hungary was in accord with their efforts in all countries. The motivations for these policies were consistent with the broader goal of creating an atomised populace. By destroying the family and the church, the state could eliminate the primary sources of loyalty that competed with it. By freeing children from parental authority and teaching them to reject religion, the state could directly shape them into the new “communist man and woman”, loyal only to the regime. It was all a carefully-designed blueprint – by the Jews – for the destruction of all Western societies, and Western civilisation itself.

A former Hungarian Prime Minister, M. Huszar, emphatically declared that “Bolshevism in Hungary could be explained alone by the fact that its moving force was the tenacious and secret solidarity of the Jews”. It is worthy of note that Gwynne identified the Khazar Jews as instigators of the turmoil in Hungary: “A particular race of Jews, the Khozar (Khazar), took a prominent part in this movement. Béla Kun, the leader of the Hungarian Bolsheviks, was a Jew, and nearly all his ministers, like Friedlander, Wertheim, Dorscak, and Lukacs, were also Jews.” According to author and historian Brenton Sanderson, “the Jews involved in these communist regimes were engaged in actions opposed to the traditional peoples and culture of these societies, while typically maintaining their own ethnic commitments”. In other words, the destruction of society, morals and religion was reserved for the Gentiles while the Jews remained as before.

Béla Kun was certainly one of the most despicable Jewish “revolutionists” to have ever appeared anywhere, responsible for the deaths and suffering of countless thousands. He was a mass murderer, a genuine terrorist. He not only formed and led the so-called Hungarian (Jewish Communist) Republic in 1919, but was already famous for his genocidal campaign against the Russian Gentiles in the Crimea with Rozalia Zemliachka (another Jew). Like many other Jews, Kun changed his name, having Magyarized his birth surname from Kohn (Cohn, Cohen). [3] And, like all other Jewish Communist leaders, Kun is praised and remembered by the Jews, with monuments and statues in a standard tribute to Jewish criminals.

Béla Kun agitating the workers. Source:

Kun was described by his Jewish comrades as a “great agitator”, a man of real revolutionary talent, a “genuine Socialist statesman”, the “first statesman Hungary has had in seventy years”. Lukacs said, “The rest of us are nothing. We do our part, but there are hundreds like us in every country”. [4] Even today, Jewish eyes glow with pride in Béla Kun.

György Lukacs was born into a family of very rich Jewish bankers, his father being the head of the biggest bank in Hungary. When the Jews seized power, Lukacs was made Kun’s Deputy Commissar for Culture and education. [5] In this role, he was the direct architect of the policies targeting the family, morals, and religion. Immediately upon the declaration of the new Jewish Soviet state, György Lukács began the depopulation process of the nation. Divorce and civil unions were introduced, and “sex education” was introduced in Budapest schools. The killing of unborn children was legalised. These and other measures led to a demographic collapse in the country, the birthrate falling precipitously. [6]

György Lukacs. Source:

Lukacs launched his “self-described demonic ideas” in what came to be known and described as a campaign of “cultural terrorism”. Its centerpiece was a radical sex education program introduced in Hungarian schools. This was not an innocent educational initiative but a deliberate effort to destroy traditional morality and the family. The curriculum instructed children in unrestrained (i.e. “free”) sex, and the nature of sexual intercourse, derided the “archaic” nature of the bourgeois family and of middle-class family codes, and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasures. Children were also urged to reject parental authority and traditional moral precepts. The project explicitly “urged children to defy authority, and to reject and mock patriarchal and ecclesiastical authority”. This was an explicit attempt to undermine the family by turning children against their parents and the moral framework that sustained them.

Women too were called to rebel against the sexual mores of the time by engaging in open sexual promiscuity, exactly as was done in Russia and other countries. Lukács declared monogamy outdated and obsolete (especially sexual relations for married women), and dismissed religion as irrelevant. The purpose in promoting licentiousness among women and children was to destroy the family, the core institution of Christianity and western culture. These Jews knew if they could destroy the West’s traditional sexual morals, they would have taken a giant step toward destroying Western culture itself – and that was clearly the definite aim. Lukács wrote a “History and Class Consciousness” in which he wrote, “I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution”. Sadly, the Hungarians suffered many months of the most intense social, sexual, and cultural attacks, from every quarter, that few countries have experienced.

Lukács justified the use of force and terror to achieve the “utopian” Jewish end, with the evidence showing that this strategy was a conscious ideological choice. This ideological shift legitimised the destruction of existing institutions and the creation of a new society through any means necessary. His actions in Hungary were a precursor to the Cultural Marxism that would later be institutionalised in the West, and that is in existence and increasing today – though not under this label. These were all designed by the Jews to destroy traditional Western social structures at their very foundations.

It was Lukács who devised and implemented the cultural and educational policies targeting the family, morality and religion. These courses and materials were systematically disseminated through school lectures and the distribution of printed materials. Lukács expressed the ambition for “a complete break with every institution and way of life originating from the bourgeois world”, stating that “without the annihilation of the old values, such a worldwide overturning of values cannot be achieved”.

In addition to programs aimed at children, Lukács’s cultural policies were explicitly directed at married women. The policies called on women to “rebel against the sexual mores of the time”. A document issued by Lukács’s People’s Commissariat “called upon women throughout the world to unite and overthrow the shackles imposed upon them by exploitative bourgeois men”. The aim of this series of measures was to fundamentally undermine the family unit – which is the cornerstone of society – by encouraging women’s “liberation” through sexual promiscuity. It cannot be a surprise that most people in Hungarian society were outraged by these policies.

A key source for this narrative is Victor Zitta’s research on Lukács. Zitta described in detail the specific content of the aforementioned sex education program, taken from original Jewish documents. His account in his book “Georg Lukács: From Romanticism to Bolshevism”, describes the program in detail: [7] “Special lectures were organised in school and literature printed and distributed to “instruct” children about unrestrained sex, about the nature of sexual intercourse, about the archaic nature of the bourgeois family codes, about the outdatedness of monogamy, and the irrelevance of religion which deprives man of all pleasure. Children urged thus to reject and deride paternal authority and the authority of the church, and to ignore precepts of morality”.

The factual basis of the account – that such a program existed and was put into practice – remains undisputed in the historical record. The academic sources do not dispute the factual existence of these programs. In his 1964 book Georg Lukács’s Marxism: Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution [8], Zita provided a detailed account of the policies implemented by Lukács during his tenure as Deputy People’s Commissar for Education and Culture.

These social machinations during the Hungarian Jewish Republic were not isolated incidents. They must be viewed as part of the 20th-century communist revolutions which sought to radically transform the social order, including “visions of the individual, the family and education”. This approach of subverting traditional notions of the family and morality through depraved sex education was continued and developed in certain later Soviet educational experiments (such as Vera Schmidt’s psychoanalytic kindergarten), [9] and in the writings of theorists such as Wilhelm Reich. Jstor carries an article titled, “Jews in Revolutions; the Hungarian Experience”. The article tells us it is “Logical to use the Hungarian example as evidence in studying the broad problem of why all over central and Eastern Europe in the century between 1848 and 1948, Jews figured as revolutionaries“. [10]

It is clear that during the Hungarian Jewish Republic of 1919, under Lukács’ leadership, a set of radical social reform policies with clear objectives and specific content was indeed implemented. These policies utilised the state education system to indoctrinate children with ideas designed to subvert traditional notions of family, morality and religion, whilst mobilising women to challenge established gender norms. Their purpose was viewed by contemporary observers as aimed at “destroying Western culture itself”. These facts form part of “buried history”, the resurrection of which I have devoted my energies, and which differ significantly from the mainstream “official narrative” imaginatively created by the Jews to sanitise their evil involvement.

Despite the apparent failure, however, the theories of Lukács and Reich about dismantling Western civilization through sexual liberation found philosophical maturity in the critical theory of the Frankfurt School. The school fled Germany in 1933 and eventually found its way to America, where it continued its project with renewed intensity.

The connection between the Russian and the Hungarian social destruction programs is not coincidental. The Hungarian Jewish Republic was established with direct support from Moscow, and its leaders, including Kun and Lukács, were operating within the broader Jewish Bolshevik framework. The “sexual enlightenment campaigns” in both countries were (and still are today) presented by the Jews as ostensibly either (a) public health reforms or (b) “freedom”, but they were in reality the systematic undermining of traditional moral structures of the family, the church, and morality.

Sexual depravity was the official program of the Jews in their many “revolutions”. The main Jewish project sought to liberate sexuality from traditional constraints, and so women’s “assistance” in satisfying male urges was not framed as submission but as “liberation” from Christian sexual morality. Alexandra Kollontai, the prominent Jewish feminist, called for unlimited sexual freedom for married women and condemned the family as an “oppressive social organisation”.

Revolutionary Tribunals and the “Red Terror”

The “Red Terror” events represent the bloodiest chapter in the brief history of the Hungarian Jewish Republic. Sources indicate that during its brief rule, the Kun regime ordered nearly 1,000 executions through the ‘Red Courts’ (Revolutionary Tribunals) it operated.

Following the establishment of the Hungarian Jewish Republic, steps were immediately taken to set up the Revolutionary Tribunals and the Anti-Counter-Revolutionary Committees. These tribunals were not intended to administer justice, but as tools for the Jewish regime to suppress dissent and consolidate their rule. Those put on trial were broadly defined as “counter-revolutionaries”, and the grounds for execution included “crimes against the revolution”. In other words, any overt expression of disagreement with the Jew’s societal destruction policies, was a crime punishable by death.

As counter-revolutionary movements both at home and abroad intensified, Kun publicly ordered the Revolutionary Tribunals to begin “operating at full capacity, showing no mercy”. A telegram he sent to Vienna explicitly declared: “Today I have signed death warrants for all counter-revolutionary leaders. I intend to eradicate the opposition with blood”. The historical annals also tell us that the small farmers distrusted the Jews and refused to sell their food. The Jew’s response: “All right, if they’re hiding their food we’ll go out with machine guns and get it”. [11]

In late June of 1919, anti-Jewish forces launched a coup against Kun’s Jewish Paradise; the rebels attempted to seize telephone and telegraph stations and shelled the Soviet headquarters. The coup failed, and Kun immediately carried out appalling and indiscriminate reprisals. As one example, the Jews ordered the execution of 40 cadets from the Budapest Military Academy. These young men, who had no involvement in the revolt, were led to a massive gallows and executed simultaneously in public. Kun then issued a proclamation stating that, given that his “moderate measures” of the prior three months had not been heeded, “blood would be shed in future, to ensure the protection of the proletariat” (i.e., the Jews).

The Execution Squads and the “Lenin Boys”

The Lenin Boys; the Hungarian Cheka. Source:

At the heart of these terror campaigns was a paramilitary organisation known as the “Lenin Boys”, the equivalent of the dreaded CHEKA the Jews created in Russia. The organisation was commanded by József Cserny who was a brutal, sadistic killer, and its members were predominantly radical young Jews.

The Lenin Boys were notorious for their atrocities and were described as a “brutal gang of youths” who “engaged in what they termed “revolutionary terror” to intimidate and suppress dissent”. They were accused of committing various crimes, including the murder of large numbers of political opponents, during Kun’s dictatorship. These acts of terror shocked the world at the time and were reported by major media outlets. In one case, Kun sent Szamuely on a special train accompanied by six executioners, to western Hungary to execute 78 so-called “counter-revolutionaries”. The reports described these trials as a “farce of justice” under the Jewish regime.

The historical facts collectively paint a picture of the brutal nature of the Hungarian Jewish Republic: institutionalised violence through revolutionary tribunals, the use of armed gangs such as the Lenin Boys to instill terror, and the carrying out of large-scale, public executions of those who voiced dissent. The description of this Jewish revolution as “exceptionally vicious and widespread” is by no means unfounded.

A MÁV armoured train in 1914, which was used during the Red Terror in 1919. Source

After the failed counter-revolutionary attempt in June of 1919, Béla Kun ordered the Lenin Youth to “stamp out counter-revolutionary urges” among the civilians; they murdered around 1,000 people. Albert Váry, in a book titled “The Victims of Red Terror in Hungary”, documented around 600 executions committed by this group. [12] Following the fall of the Jewish regime, Cserny was put on trial for his atrocities, as were many other members of the Lenin Boys. He was sentenced to death for murder and was hanged. Many other members suffered the same fate. [13] [14]

The end of the Jewish Hungarian Regime

Polish-born Felix Edmundovich Dzerzhinsky (1877 – 1926) near Lenin’s temporary mausoleum, 1924. Also in the group are Vyacheslav Molotov, Avel Enukidze, Muralov, L. B. Krasin, Bela Kun and A. Y. Belen’kyi. Dzerzhinsky was the founder of the Bolshevik secret police, the Cheka, later the KGB. Source

Fortunately for Hungary, Kun’s Communist regime lost all support when the Romanian army marched into Hungary and occupied Budapest. Kun’s regime collapsed, and he and his Communist followers fled to Austria, then to Russia, looting countless art treasures and the entire gold stocks of Hungary’s National Bank when they left.

I would note emphatically that Hungarian leaders harbored the same sentiments toward Jews as did Hitler, and for all the same reasons. They recognised – on a very personal level – the immense human and social destructiveness of Jewish “values”, and the savage brutality for which the Jews have become famous.

Anti-Semitism, Pogroms, and Other Fairy Tales

One of the results of this short-lived but nonetheless tragic Jewish revolution, was the emergence of a virulent dislike of Jews, since most members of Kun’s government were Jews. Virtually all Hungarians were soon both strongly anti-Communist and anti-Jew, as a natural result of the Jewish terrorism, the slaughters and executions, the disgusting and traumatising social and sexual policies the Jews implemented. Communists and Jews were considered essentially indistinguishable one from the other.

This powerful antipathy for Jews was hardly a surprise, given the murderous destructiveness of these people. After the Jewish “revolutionary governments” were overturned and the leaders driven out of the various countries, the surviving populations quite naturally were deeply resentful of Jews. It can hardly be a surprise that the victimised nations wanted all Jews either expelled or killed. As one observer noted, “Why should the beasts who wanted to bring us Bolshevism be spared? Nations that did not rid themselves of Jews, perished.”

When Kun and his revolutionary followers were driven out of Hungary, there were some sporadic massacres organised by Hungarian officers, whose wives had been “shamefully and obscenely maltreated” by the Jews. The feelings were so strong they resulted in a wave of reprisals in which many Jewish Communists were executed. It would be easy, as I believe is too often done, to blame these reprisals on feelings of “anti-Semitism”, but both evidence and logic would indicate the purges were directed against evil and savage oppressors rather than being based on race or religion.

I once referenced this Hungarian tragedy in another article and was bitterly attacked by the entire Hasbara tribe, one Jew claiming that Hungary had only “a few months of mild unrest”. And, in spite of the extensive documentation of the atrocities committed by the Jews in Hungary, the papers in Europe and England, (all pro-Jewish) were “deluged with lurid accounts of atrocities committed by the anti-Semitic Hungarians”. The atrocity tales, like all such stories the Jews promulgate so frequently, were all proven to be false. These lurid stories that circulated in the press served to deflect attention from the actions that provoked the backlash, whether in Hungary, Russia, Germany, or elsewhere.

The Jews are the world’s only race that does this. One example was the story of Hamas in Israel beheading 40 babies, US President Joe Biden supporting this ridiculous fiction by claiming to have seen actual photos. The stories were later admitted to be false. Another example was with Iraq, where a young member of the Kuwait royal family testified to the US Congress to have seen 200 premature infants taken out of incubators and thrown on the cold hospital floor to die, while Iraqi soldiers took away the incubators. [15] There are thousands of such stories, all either definitively proven false or with no evidence ever surfacing.

The Jew’s “official narrative” about the Communist revolution in Hungary suppresses and deletes all the critical background information, excising all their wanton slaughters and their almost unimaginably evil social policies. And – as always – the Jews rewrite history to present themselves as the “victims”. And, with the Jew’s virtual stranglehold on the media and on book publishing, most people never learn the truth of the despicable Jewish role in Western history. The Jewish version invariably omits all the important detail and crucial facts, most especially the actions of the Jews and the real cause of the intense dislike for Jews harbored by literally billions of people.

As one clear example, Jewish so-called “historians” converted the so-called “pogrom” backlash against the Jews in Hungary into what they invented as “The White Terror”. This was meant to erase, or at least severely diminish the effects of the “Red Terror” organised by the Jews. Their version dismisses their own killings as involving “only a few hundred” deaths while “thousands” of Jews were killed, the numbers inflated to 5,000 or more with no supporting evidence.

The so-called “White Terror” was not an outbreak of irrational anti‑Semitic hatred, but a violent reaction to a deliberate campaign of revolutionary destruction that was led by Jewish activists. The Jews who perpetrated these acts were not innocent victims of bigotry but active agents who sought to dismantle Christian civilisation, the family, private property, and national sovereignty. The subsequent reprisals were a response to those acts, not to the mere fact of Jewish identity.

The Red Terror under Kun was not an aberration but a deliberate policy of revolutionary violence, carried out by a regime whose leadership was overwhelmingly Jewish. The so-called “White Terror” that followed was a reaction to that revolutionary violence, not an irrational outburst of ethnic hatred, but a counter‑revolutionary purge aimed at those who had just attempted to destroy the nation. The subsequent historiography, which emphasises Jewish suffering while downplaying or justifying the Red Terror, is part of a broader pattern of narrative manipulation designed to protect the Jewish revolutionary actors from historical accountability.

We need to consciously re‑evaluate the framework within which the thesis of “anti-Semitic” pogroms and Jewish victimisation are taught to us in our history books and through the media. Whenever we see reports that portray Jews predominantly as victims, we need to treat those with the same skepticism as any official narrative, as fabrications concocted by the Jews to bury their own atrocities. The core point is that the narrative of Jewish victimhood is itself a constructed story, designed to obscure the historical agency of Jewish actors in revolutionary movements, financial exploitation, social disruption, mass murders, and widespread atrocities.

Rosalia Zakkind Zemlyachka is best known for her involvement in the organization of the First Russian revolution, and as a member of the “troika”- Crimean Revolutionary Committee of Communist Party. She, along with Bela Kun, was one of the organizers of the Red Terror in the Crimea in 1920-1921, against former soldiers of the White Army. For merits in the matter of political education and improving the combat effectiveness of the Red Army units, Rosalia Zemlyachka was awarded the Order of the Red Banner in 1921. She was the first woman to receive such an award. Source

This is a broad, recurring historical pattern: Jewish‑led revolutionary movements (Russia 1917, Hungary 1919, Germany 1918–1919, and others) attempted to seize state power and implement radical social transformation. These movements were accompanied by systematic attacks on religion, the family, traditional morality, and national identity. When the local population eventually reacted – often violently – against the revolutionaries and their supporters, the Jewish media and academic establishments frame the reaction as “anti‑Semitic persecution”. This framing erases the agency of the Jewish revolutionaries and transforms them into innocent victims, while the local population is painted as bigoted and irrational.

I would note that this pattern mirrors the historical expulsions of Jews from European countries over the past millennium: the official explanation is always “anti‑Semitism”, but the underlying causes were Jewish involvement in tax farming, usury, white slavery, and other exploitative practices that provoked widespread resentment.

Please take note of this extremely serious observation: Whenever “buried history” is uncovered, especially relating to what I might term “crimes against humanity” by the Jews, there are those who want to protect the perpetrators at almost any cost. Jewish so-called “scholars” will in every case bitterly attack anyone voicing the truth of Jewish criminal travesties, engaging in savage personal denunciations of the individuals without ever addressing the actual facts of a situation.

Their inevitable method is to engage in “hit pieces”, where they ignore the content and brutally attack the individual who exposes them. Their hope is that they can stain an author’s reputation sufficiently that no one will read his works. They attempt to trash the reputation of individuals in the hope that uninformed readers will believe the Jewish version and avoid the writings of those who tell the truth. The Jews have done this to a very long list of respectable authors, David Irving and James Bacque being two prominent examples. They do this because the facts themselves cannot be refuted and, since they cannot defend themselves on facts, Jews resort to character assassination.

If you want to read a typical Jewish spin on Jewish atrocities, you can read “Lenin’s Boys: A Short History of Soviet Hungary”, written by a Jew named Doug Enaa Greene. [16] The subtitle of the article is “The Hungarian Soviet Republic and its tragic defeat”. This alone tells you everything you need to know. One quote: “The wave of enthusiasm over the establishment of a Soviet Republic in Hungary had hardly passed when the proletariat of Bavaria got possession of power and extended the hand of brotherly unison to the Russian and Hungarian Republics.” Oddly, the entire article has no mention of Jews anywhere, only stories of peasants and workers overthrowing their “oppressive masters”. All we see of this history are titles like “The Destruction of the Jews of Hungary” [17] or “The Holocaust in Hungary”. [18] And this is how history is spun.

Jewish Looting

This is a fact of the Jews and their worldwide Communist revolutions, one which has been so deeply buried that perhaps not one person in a hundred million has knowledge of it: Jews are the world’s art thieves. We have all been inundated with tales of “the Nazis” confiscating artworks, books and jewelry from Jews in Germany, but that was never true to any significant extent. However, by contrast, the Jews had a policy of looting all the artworks, books, jewelry and gold from every country where they managed to seize power through their revolutions. When their Russian revolution petered out, the Jews looted much of Russia of its artwork, precious religious icons, all the gold from Russia’s central bank, and most of the jewelry from the Romanov family when they executed them.

The Jews extended their art confiscation practices from Russia to Hungary and other nations. Historian Sean McMeekin, in his book “History’s Greatest Heist”, [19] documented in detail how the Jews executed one of the largest looting operations in history, targeting citizens’ cash savings, gold, silver, diamonds, jewelry, icons, antiques, and artworks. In Russia, the Jews created brigades which systematically looted over 2.6 million artworks, more than 6 million books. Also, most of the Romanov family’s gold, jewelry, and other treasures were stolen. These treasures were subsequently spirited out of the country into private Jewish collections, or sold through auction houses such as Christie’s.

Less than a month after taking control in Hungary, and simultaneously with Kun’s confiscation of land and commerce, the Jews issued a decree ordering the confiscation of libraries and art collections in castles, museums and other sources, in all of Hungary. In addition to paintings and other artwork, the Jews confiscated all public and private book collections from museums, all private mansions and castles, from the churches, from various associations, and even from corporations and individuals. This decree was a systematic “socialisation of cultural assets”, and a crucial element of the Jew’s nationalisation policy in Hungary – as it was in other countries were the Jews managed to obtain political power. These art thefts by the Jews were not only systematic, but thorough and widespread.

The stated intent was that these confiscated cultural assets were to be used to establish public libraries or museums for the proletariat, and the Jews held an exhibition in Budapest showcasing some of the artworks they had confiscated. But before Kun’s regime fell, the exhibition contents had disappeared, and it was later revealed that Kun and his followers took a huge number of art treasures and the Hungarian National Bank’s gold reserves when they fled to Vienna.

The Jews did not confiscate individual bank deposits, but each individual was permitted to draw from his account only a pittance each month, and that only if he proved he had no other source of income. Jewels and other valuable private possessions were confiscated from the “bourgeoisie” from the beginning. According to Kun, the purpose of these measures was to prevent anyone in Hungary from obtaining more than his share of food.

What is termed “Systematic Trophy Looting” was institutionalised as a pattern by the Jews in all their revolutions. Hungary and Russia were not isolated cases. They also confiscated vast quantities of archives from Germany and Eastern European countries. This cultural plundering, carried out in the name of “revolution” or “liberation”, was simply theft on a massive scale.

This systematic looting was rooted in Jewish ideology, which considered it legitimate to “expropriate the expropriators”. It treated confiscated art, jewelry, and other wealth as “war booty” that could be freely disposed of to support the revolutionary cause. And, in any case, the artworks belonged to Gentiles – who were undeserving and who had no property or other rights.

The 1919 Hungarian decree was a concrete manifestation of a highly organised pattern that was part of the Jew’s global revolutionary strategy. It demonstrates that the systematic looting of cultural assets was, from the very beginning, one of the means used by the Jews to destroy the old order and build a new world. It was also a blatant scheme to make some Jewish families obscenely wealthy. From the Romanov treasures in Russia, to the libraries and museums of Hungary and Germany, to the massive post‑Second World War transfers across Eastern Europe, this pattern transcended borders and eras.

In 1919, similar policies were attempted in Germany by the Jewish Soviet Republic in Bavaria. When the Jews had the British military destroy the Yuanmingyuan in China, millions of artifacts were looted, many if not most of them ending in private Jewish collections. To this day, some of the most valuable pieces have appeared at international art auctions, inevitably by a Jewish seller. The same was true with Iraq, where every museum was literally emptied of artifacts and scrolls of inestimable historical and financial value, and all private collections seized. Again, these seem to regularly appear in the hands of wealthy Jews.

Featured image: An automobile loaded with communists dashing through streets of Budapest, March 1919. Source

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 150 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

His full archive can be seen at

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/

He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com

NOTES – Part 7

[1] Exposing the Jewish Criminal Bela Kun
https://www.deathofcommunism.com/bela-kun/

[2] ‘In Communist Hungary’ by Crystal Eastman from The Liberator. Vol. 2 No. 8. August, 1919.
https://revolutionsnewsstand.com/2023/04/22/in-communisthungarybycrystal-eastman-from-the-liberator-vol-2-no-8-august-1919/

[3] Béla Kun.
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Bela_Kun

[4] ‘In Communist Hungary’ by Crystal Eastman from The Liberator. Vol. 2 No. 8. August, 1919.
https://revolutionsnewsstand.com/2023/04/22/in-communisthungarybycrystal-eastman-from-the-liberator-vol-2-no-8-august-1919/

[5] Depopulacja Węgier
https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1295247

[6] Encyclopedia of Judaism: LUKÁCS, GEORG
https://judaism_enc.en-academic.com/12619/LUK%25C3%2581CS%252C_GEORG

[7] Victor Zitta, Georg Lukács: From Romanticism to Bolshevism
https://archive.org/details/georgelukacsfrom0000lowy

[8] Georg Lukács’s Marxism: Alienation, Dialectics, Revolution
https://archive.org/details/georglukacsmarxi0000zitt

[9] The Psychoanalytic Kindergarten Project in Soviet Russia
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yordanka-Valkanova/publication/301219889_Valkanova_Y_2016_The_Psychoanalytic_Kindergarten_Project_in_Soviet_Russia_1921-1930_SCRSS_Digest_13_2/links/57516dbd08ae02ac12759683/Valkanova-Y-2016-The-Psychoanalytic-Kindergarten-Project-in-Soviet-Russia-1921-1930-SCRSS-Digest-13-2.pdf

[10] Jews in Revolutions; the Hungarian Experience
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3786436

[11] ‘In Communist Hungary’ by Crystal Eastman from The Liberator. Vol. 2 No. 8. August, 1919.
https://revolutionsnewsstand.com/2023/04/22/in-communisthungarybycrystal-eastman-from-the-liberator-vol-2-no-8-august-1919/

[12] Lenin Boys Explained
https://everything.explained.today/Lenin_Boys/

[13] criminal trial of József Cserny and his associates
https://library.hungaricana.hu/hu/collection/leveltari_iratok_BFL_1918-1919ForradalmakForrasai_VorosKulonitmenyCserny/

[14] Albert Váry. Indictment in the criminal case of József Cserny and his associates, accused of the crime of murder, robbery
https://www.arcanum.com/hu/online-kiadvanyok/Petrik-magyar-konyveszet-17121920-2/19111920ii-2FB2A/vary-albert-vadbeszed-gyilkossag-rablas-stb-buntettevel-vadolt-cserny-jozsef-es-tarsai-bunugyeben-1919-dec-6-an-a-budapesti-buntetotorvenyszek-el-3431C/

[15] Kuwait Story of Babies Removed From Incubators Refuses to Die
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-03-06-mn-3337-story.html

[16] Lenin’s Boys: A Short History of Soviet Hungary
https://cosmonautmag.com/2020/08/lenins-boys-a-short-history-of-soviet-hungary/

[17] The Destruction of the Jews of Hungary
https://holocaustresearchproject.net/othercamps/DestructionofHungarianJews.html

[18] The Holocaust in Hungary
https://museeholocauste.ca/en/resources-training/hungary-holocaust/

[19] History’s Greatest Heist: The Looting of Russia by the Bolsheviks
https://barnesreview.org/product/historys-greatest-heist-the-looting-of-russia-by-the-bolsheviks/

This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.

Other Works by this Author