The year 2015 will
come out as the most pivotal year for humanity. This is the year when
geopolitical rhetoric were translated into decisive actions and the once covert
and hybrid World War 3 has come out in the open for all the world to see.
This is the year
when multiple instigations for a full blown nuclear exchange with China were
rejected gracefully in favor of the establishment of multiple financial
institutions that will finance the massive revival of the ancient Eurasian Silk
Road which should render the Rothschild Khazarian World Bank a mere relic of
our decadent past.
This is the year
when BRICS Eurasian security groups were consolidated into one coherent force
to battle and defeat global terrorism – the Reformist Collective’s euphemism
for Khazarian Mafia; This is the year when the real face of terror was unmasked
in all its Khazarian glory for all the mainstream spectators to see;
This is the year
when alternative media celebrate its undeniable victory over mainstream media
which are losing at least 60% of the US audience, while the rest of the world
were already digging alternative sources of information much earlier.
But what they can’t
hide is their incoherent responses to multiple attacks by the BRICS Alliance
and other covert groups. The falling narrative anchored in false flag
operations that have lost their intended psychological effect is forcing the
White House / State Department spokesman to venture into the parallel world of
illusions.
This is the year
when multiple first-hand, direct witnesses and courageous whistleblowers are
taking the podium to tell the world we have been deliberately deceived and
poisoned for decades with all sorts of chemicals, heavy metals, and germ
warfare.
This is also the
year when the Keenan Group confirmed the recovery of at least 70% of the
Collateral Accounts and is releasing about $1.7 Trillion for humanitarian
assistance starting next year.
Surely, these could
all be exploited through that same dialectic principles guiding societies for
centuries, or maybe the whole objective all along is to turn everybody into
more obedient citizens just like the Chinese people in one massive social
engineering.
But we are much
better prepared now and we are ready to expose all their malice. Together.
These sociopaths are
evidently losing their grip on how people synthesize their own gathered
information, as oppose to just being fed.
The enemies of
humanity are now in panic mode.
Russian Strategic
Moves in East Asia Leave US
Policymakers in a Panic
Policymakers in a Panic
In their analysis, recently published in the US-based international affairs magazine The National Interest, experts Michelle Shevin-Coetzee and Axel Hellman warn that when it comes to foreign affairs, US policymakers “should not favor the short-term to the exclusion of the long-term,” particularly when it comes to Washington’s long-term plans for its so-called ‘pivot to East Asia’.
Affiliated
with the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), one
of Washington’s key think tanks on military affairs, Shevin-Coetzee
and Hellman warned that “as Russia manages to straddle” the fine line
between crisis management and strategic planning, managing “immediate
crises and investing in future partnerships,” US policymakers must attempt
to do the same.
In particular,
mindful of the Obama administration’s long-standing intention to ‘pivot’ toward Asia, and of Moscow’s new, more assertive stand, the
analysts suggest that “policymakers cannot afford to neglect the
Asia-Pacific [region] and the increasing role that Russia is playing there.
Home to vibrant economies, emerging powers and more than half the
world’s population, the region holds significant economic promise.”
“Yet there are real
perils and potential challenges that require careful attention,” the analysts
warn. These, they suggest, stem from Russia, naturally…
Commenting
on China’s recent moves to bolster its security position in the
Pacific, something which has irritated US policymakers used to American
dominance in the region to no end, Shevin-Coetzee and Hellman warn
that “recently…it is not only Beijing’s actions that should concern American
policymakers.”
“Russia is developing
a closer defense, economic and energy relationship with China and other
countries in the region. Although this burgeoning Sino-Russian partnership
is not a panacea for each country’s woes, it is a particularly convenient
one as Moscow secures both alternative export markets and political
influence, and Beijing counters the United States’ reluctance to craft a
new world order favorable to China.”
Now, “in light
of this newfound entente and Russia’s strategic shift eastward,” the
hawkish analysts suggest, “the Asia-Pacific [region] presents new challenges
that were not as salient when the United States first announced the
rebalance.”
“From a security
perspective, Beijing and Moscow are taking actions that could threaten American
interests and those of its allies and partners. In particular, Russia
plays a key role in China’s military modernization, providing the country
with advanced missiles, radar and other systems that are central
to Beijing’s acquisition of anti-access/area denial (A2/AD)
capabilities.”
Specifically,
Shevin-Coetzee and Hellman point to Russia’s deal, signed last year, to deliver the S-400 Triumf air-defense
systemto China,
suggesting that the move “represents an important milestone” in the
security relationship between the two countries.
Russia’s moves
to help China beef up its air defenses, according to the
analysts, will be sure to “lead American allies and partners, particularly
Japan, to fear the growing A2/AD threat in the Asia-Pacific, raising
the costs for Washington to respond to future Chinese actions.”
Reading between the lines, the experts seem to suggest that to the
US and its allies, China’s growing ability to defend itself
against US airpower is somehow ‘threatening’.
From an economic
standpoint, the CNAS analysts suggest that “a deeper Sino-Russian entente also
risks undermining the ability of the United States to project
economic and financial power,” limiting, for instance, Washington’s
ability to bring Russia to its knees following the crisis
over Ukraine last year.
“Sanctions
on Russia imposed by the West, for example, have squeezed
Russia’s external borrowing by forcing sanctioned corporations
to seek emergency funding from the Russian government, thereby
drawing down Russia’s sovereign reserves. Sino-Russian cooperation
in the financial sphere, however, can mitigate these effects. In 2014,
Moscow and Beijing signed a currency swap agreement worth $24 billion, a move
intended to reduce Moscow’s reliance on the dollar and promote the
international use of the renminbi.”
“Another pact,” the
experts note, “encourages billions in Chinese financing
to cash-strapped Russian companies through cooperative measures
between the China Construction Bank Corporation and the Russian Direct
Investment Fund.” And, “although Chinese banks have been relatively reluctant
to meet Russia’s demand for financial assistance, the prospect
for desperate Russian firms to turn to Beijing for fresh
capital could challenge the financial leverage of the United States and
its allies.”
“Overall,” the proponents
of American hegemony warn, “financial cooperation between the two
countries help project a weaker image of the United States, particularly
regarding the role of the US dollar in global markets.”
Accordingly, the
analysts suggest, “the Sino-Russian entente and the fresh challenges it
presents underscore the need for the United States to sustain its
focus on the region and broaden the rebalance.”
Vaguely alluding
to the establishment of “a clear interagency approach to best utilize
American diplomatic, financial and military power” to challenge “Russian
assertiveness,” the analysts do not seem to have any specific
recommendations on how the US might deal with China, the other
partner in the Moscow-Beijing ‘entente’.
Indeed, it remains
unclear exactly what options are really open to a Washington increasingly
looking to ‘contain’ China militarily and economically (including via the
proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership, a free trade pact which excludes China),
while simultaneously trying to diminish Beijing’s friendship
with Moscow.
In any case,
Shevin-Coetzee and Hellman suggest that despite the fact that “many
Washington policymakers view the Asia-Pacific as just one of the many
regions around the globe that requires attention,” the reality is that
“the dynamism of the Asia-Pacific and the prospect of a closer
Sino-Russian relationship will fundamentally shape the international economy
and global stability in the twenty-first century.” Accordingly, Washington
must do something, lest its opportunity to protect its own global hegemony
slips away.
While the United
States is trying hard to pivot to Asia, its “closest ally,” the Philippines,
has just signed with the AIIB a few hours ago as one of its founding member.
“After months of
holding out, the Philippines on Wednesday said it would join the China-led
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank before a year-end deadline for founding
members.
The Southeast Asian
nation will sign the AIIB’s articles of agreement before Dec. 31, the
government said in a statement. The Philippines said its indicative paid-in capital
would be $196 million, payable over five years.”
This is indicative
of the fact that without the persistent HAARP induced coercions of our
government we will be at peace with our neighboring Asian countries.
Although, we were
born spiritual warriors, our appetite for senseless wars of aggression is over.
Our people are beginning to see the travesty of it all.
We can see that
China’s airstrip constructions are the direct result of the constant US
provocations in the West Philippines Sea.
We don’t want US
military forces serving as magnet for China’s incursion into our territory in
the Kalayaan Islands. Proof of that is the non-renewal of the treaty for the
country to host the largest US military base outside of US mainland, back in
1991.
In the same token,
event the Okinawans are suing their Tokyo government in order to avert the
construction of another American military base in Japan.
And even at this
last few hours before we welcome the new year 2016, Iran has been provoked into
another military inflict by accusing the country of firing a rocket into Us
aircraft carrier at the Gulf.
“Tehran has
officially denied that its Revolutionary Guards’ patrol vessel launched rockets
in imminent proximity to the USS Harry S. Truman and its convoy entering the
Persian Gulf, calling the allegation an act of “psychological warfare.”
The United States
military misadventures around the globe is destroying secular nations
irreversibly, while it is undermining its own economy at home.
“Washington moved in
the wrong direction both in the economic and political arenas. In place of
diplomacy, Washington used threats and coercion. “Do as you are told or we will
bomb you into the stone age,” as Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage
told President Musharraf of Pakistan. Not content to bully weak countries,
Washington threatens poweful countries such as Russia, China, and Iran with
economic sanctions and military actions. Consequently, much of the non-Western
world is abandoning the US dollar as world currency, and a number of countries
are organizing a payments system, World Bank, and IMF of their own. Some NATO
members are rethinking their membership in an organization that Washington is
herding into conflict with Russia.
China’s unexpectedly
rapid rise to power owes much to the greed of American capitalism. Pushed
by Wall Street and the lure of “performance bonuses,” US corporate executives
brought a halt to rising US living standards by sending high productivity, high
value-added jobs abroad where comparable work is paid less. With the jobs went
the technology and business knowhow. American capability was given to China.
Apple Computer, for example, has not only offshored the jobs but also
outsourced its production. Apple does not own the Chinese factories that
produce its products.
The savings in US
labor costs became corporate profits, executive renumeration, and shareholder
capital gains. One consequence was the worsening of the US income distribution
and the concentration of income and wealth in few hands. A middle class
democracy was transformed into an oligarchy. As former President Jimmy
Carter recently said, the US is no longer a democracy; it is an oligarchy.”
“Christine Lagarde stated that global trade has seen a significant decrease and a plunge in commodities prices is threatening economies. Financial sectors in many states are also weak due to financial risks in emerging markets, she added.
“All of that
means global growth will be disappointing and uneven in 2016,” Lagarde
said.
Low productivity,
ageing populations in developed countries and the aftermath of a
global financial crisis have diminished growth, the IMF head asserted.
In IMF assessments
last October, the economy was projected to grow by 3.6 percent
in 2016.”
Compare that to the
Asian “new normal” projected growth at 7%, or thereabouts.
No wonder the Swiss
Army Chief is warning of social unrest and has called upon Swiss citizens to
armed themselves.
“Swiss army chief
André Blattmann warned, in a Swiss newspaper article on Sunday, the risks of social unrest in Europe are
soaring. Recalling the experience of 1939/1945, Blattman fears the increasing
aggression in public discourse is an explosively hazardous situation, and advises
the Swiss people to arm themselves and warns that the basis for
Swiss prosperity is “being called into question.”
This could also mean
another false flag is in the offing.
Another proof of US
irresponsible meddling is the impending Ukrainian debt default that will happen
a few hours from now.
“Ukraine has until January 1 to repay its $3 billion debt to Russia to avoid a default.
The Russian Finance
Ministry announced on Wednesday that Ukraine’s formal default would occur
on December 31 after the expiration of the 10-day “grace”
period, during which Kiev was still able to make a payment.
If Ukraine fails
to make payments under the Eurobonds Russia bought in late 2013,
Moscow warned it would bring the matter before an international
arbitration court.”
It’s very clear that
after a nation is effectively ruined they just left it for grabs. How can it do
otherwise when even the Obama government is struggling to survive until next
year?
“U.S. President
Barack Obama will make his fifth trip to Germany in late April, the White House
announced Wednesday, where he will meet with German Chancellor Angela Merkel
and address ongoing trade negotiations.
…
The trip
“underscores the enduring political and economic ties between Americans and
Germans and highlights the U.S. commitment to trade and investment as drivers
of job creation and economic growth on both sides of the Atlantic,” Earnest
said in a statement.
Obama will be the
first sitting president to participate in the proceedings, according to the
statement. During his trip, Obama will also discuss ongoing negotiation efforts
on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the United States
and the European Union, of which Germany constitutes the largest portion of
gross domestic product.”
Is it really about
“enduring political and economic ties between Americans and Germans”, or is it
out of sheer desperation forcing the US president to become “the first sitting
president to participate in the proceedings”?
On a more positive
note, the new year will be welcomed with a huge solar storm which means we’re
going to get much wiser next year.
So, go barefoot on
the first morning and welcome the first 2016 sunrise by charging yourselves
physically, mentally and optically. Yes, go ahead and sungaze.
Happy New Year 2016
everyone!
Mabuhay!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment