Democracy, The Most Dangerous Religion
9. Chapter 9 – Democracy and Universal Values
BULGARIAN CHINESE ENGLISH ESTONIAN POLSKI ROMANIAN
Democracy, The Most Dangerous Religion e-book
My Fellow Americans :
The United States of America has many laws, but why does it have them? As an example, why does your country have laws against insider trading in securities? The answer should be obvious: at some time in the past, some Americans tried to unfairly enrich themselves by gaming the system. Your government responded by enacting legislation and regulations that might prevent or at least punish those who committed these acts in the future. But then why doesn't everyone have these same laws? It isn't because they approve of insider trading; it's because they have (so far) had no need for such laws. Some countries have no stock exchanges, so the point is moot. Some countries have stock trading in its infancy and insider trading has not been a problem. Maybe in some countries the people are more honest than Americans or, more likely, have found other preferred ways to cheat the system. In any case, not everyone has what you have. The reason your country has these laws is because you needed them. Your nation developed in a manner that exposed a weakness which required preventive legislation.
But most importantly, your securities legislation was not enacted because God told you to do it. That excuse is reserved for George Bush invading Iraq to find WMDs. The laws are there because of your country's history – the way your nation developed. It shouldn't be necessary to point out to you that another nation that developed in a different way might well have different laws. The point of all this, is that there ain't no “ democracy ” here. There ain't no religion here, no freedoms, no human rights, no universal values, here. What there is here, is “ let's stop some Americans from cheating .” And no more than that. Again, you should be able to extrapolate from this one example, and maybe begin to more clearly see your country the way it is.
Why did your former governments insist on a separation of church and state? And why didn't every nation enact those laws? Why did your government – and ONLY your government – adopt the principle of separation of powers? Why did it proclaim the (largely illusory) independence of the judiciary? The reason should be obvious to you. There was a felt need for such legislation because of the way your nation developed. Your laws, policies, procedures, attitudes, developed from your history. You are a product of your environment, or maybe your environment is the product of you. You have enacted all these laws, adopted all these attitudes, because they were necessary – for you. Since each other nation did what was necessary for them, not everything is the same – nor should it be.
Why do people in the UK drive their cars on the left side of the road, when you drive on the right? And who cares? They developed differently than you, and they do things differently. Are you going to tell us that driving on the right side of the road is a “ universal value that reflects the true yearnings of all mankind ”? Do you want to add this to your long and foolish list of the 1,001 things included in “ democracy, freedom and human rights ”? Other countries may not need those same laws, for any number of reasons. So, in what mental state are you operating when you demand that all other nations adopt these same values – just because YOU have them? Who are you, anyway ?
No comments:
Post a Comment