THE GLOBALIZATION OF CENTRAL BANKS
By JC Collins
Disclaimer: The following
material is written from the perspective of the global interests which are
engineering the multilateral financial system and shifting the monetary
frameworks away from the USD based system, and the imbalances that are inherent
within that framework. In researching this material and structuring essays such
as this one, it is challenging to coherently write from an opposing position,
or even supporting position for that matter. The material is presented in
a neutral manner and the reader can make self determinations based on their own
prejudices and analytical abilities. Where I have expressed opposition
should be obvious to the reader.~
With
the coming multilateral financial system the framework of global institutions
such as the International Monetary Fund will have to be adjusted, which is what
we are seeing with the now imminent implementation of Plan B for
the 2010 IMF Quota and Governance Reforms. The reforms will restructure the
institution to more accurately reflect the economic realities of the emerging
economies, such as China.
As
we discussed in the previous post, the shift towards the multilateral is in
essence a shift away from the USD structured system. The current dollar based
system has survived on a monetary policy framework which has focused on price
stability and output growth, both of which affect financial stability through
impacts on asset valuations, commodity prices, credit, leverage, and exchange
rates.
The central banks of the
world have followed inconsistent monetary policy frameworks with only
marginal attempts at preventing domestic growth initiatives from having a
negative spillover effect into other regions and countries. This spillover
effect is most profound in the practice of cross border capital flows, which
lead to many of the financial stability metrics listed above.
The imbalances in the
USD balance of payment system and the monetary policy framework of central
banks has been the main cause of economic imbalances between developed
economies and emerging economies. For any multilateral financial system
to work effectively these imbalances must be addressed and related frameworks
adjusted.
The 2010 Quota and
Governance Reforms address the needed adjustments to the International Monetary
Fund but not for the broader framework of central banks.
Central bank mandates
and monetary policy frameworks have been insufficient at addressing these
broader imbalances. As such, the frameworks of the central banking system
needs to be restructured around the same lines as the IMF Reforms.
The Bank for International
Settlements has set the mandates and policy frameworks of the central
banks since its inception. The BIS holds regular meetings with the
governors of the banks but these meetings are also insufficient at developing
alternative frameworks and creating the atmosphere of transparency which would
be required to minimize the spillover effect of inconsistent policies.
The
coordination between the central banks of the world is necessary in order for
any adjustments and restructuring of mandates and framework policies to be
effectively implemented. Within the BIS organization is a working group called
theCommittee on the Global
Financial System, which is mandated with designing and implementing
these adjustments and building transparency between the banks themselves, and
between the banks and other global institutions, such as the IMF.
This committee is made
of the more important central banks and the focus is on global liquidity, joint
money and credit policies, and financial stability. The member banks are:
Reserve
Bank of Australia
|
Bank
of Korea
|
National
Bank of Belgium
|
Central
Bank of Luxembourg
|
Central
Bank of Brazil
|
Bank
of Mexico
|
Bank
of Canada
|
Netherlands
Bank
|
People’s
Bank of China
|
Monetary
Authority of Singapore
|
European
Central Bank
|
Bank
of Spain
|
Bank
of France
|
Sveriges
Riksbank
|
Deutsche
Bundesbank
|
Swiss
National Bank
|
Hong
Kong Monetary Authority
|
Bank
of England
|
Reserve
Bank of India
|
Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
|
Bank
of Italy
|
Federal
Reserve Bank of New York
|
Bank
of Japan
|
The astute reader will
notice that Russia is not included in the list, which likely has a lot to do
with the recent demonization of Russia in the western media and the attempts by
Russia to be included into the broader multilateral reforms. We could
potentially see a situation down the road where China turns its back on Russia
and the BRICS alliance is fragmented, but at that point the multilateral
financial system will be in play, which in such a case would suggest that China
manipulated the BRICS development to its own advantage.
Some of the items that
the committee will have to develop are a new set of mandates for financial
stability, stress tests to measure effective changes on asset prices, economic
activity, and how to prevent bubbles as opposed to only identifying them, or
causing them.
Others items will
consist of non-monetary tools which are both micro and macroprudential.
These adjustments to the
monetary policy frameworks could potentially lead to periods where the central
banks deviate from previous inflation targets, but that outcome is now
considered acceptable over the continuation of financial instability. This
statement alone signals the inevitable end of QE policies and ZIRP, or zero
interest rate policies which have kept deflation at bay by promoting
inflation. Interest rates will rise for the broader adjustments to be
effective and the spillover effect will be minimized.
The move to the
multilateral system requires the broader integration and coordination between
central banks and institutions such as the IMF and BIS, with governments
giving up more of their financial autonomy in regards to financial regulation.
The alternative is a deepening and continuation of financial instability, which
is now beginning to become more entrenched as deflation and a growing liquidity
crisis.
The globalization of
financial institutions is mandatory in order for the world to enact orderly sovereign
debt restructuring. An important component of this debt restructuring is
the exchange of foreign reserve accounts with SDR’s, or Special Drawing Rights
of the IMF. This exchange will be completed through substitution accounts,
which will allow for the creation of SDR liquidity, as currently SDR’s are only
created through allocation, which is insufficient at meeting the global demands
for liquidity.
SDR claims should
be exchanged directly with the central banks for domestic currency.
For the full integration
of SDR’s and central bank monetary policy frameworks to be successful,
governments around the world will have to pass legislation which would amend
the policies and mandates surrounding national treasuries, and how they
interact with the national central banks.
These important
adjustments to legislation will help prevent the potential of large foreign
exchange losses as the USD balance of payments system completes the transition
to the multilateral SDR based system.
Pending adjustments to
national legislation to support the SDR, a system of credit lines could be
developed which would be administered by both the IMF and BIS. But with
the existing availability of the SDR, it is counter productive to not pass
national legislation supporting framework policy adjustments.
The American Congress
holding up legislation supporting the 2010 IMF Quota and Governance Reforms is
one such situation where delays have been counter productive. As
previously discussed, the reforms will be implemented whether through Plan A or
Plan B, with the latter being extremely more destructive to American monetary
policy frameworks.
The Committee on the
Global Financial System continues to restructure the monetary policy frameworks
of the worlds central banks and we await the implementation of Plan B for the
IMF reforms. Things are progressing as planned and the world continues the
shift into 2015 and closer to the full realization of the multilateral
financial system. – JC
No comments:
Post a Comment