Labels

SUPPORT JULIAN ASSANGE

Showing posts with label KATEHON. Show all posts
Showing posts with label KATEHON. Show all posts

Friday, January 20, 2017

TRUMP’S DECLARATION OF WAR -- Paul Craig Roberts



 21.01.2017
President Trump’s brief inaugural speech was a declaration of war against the entirety of the American Ruling Establishment.  All of it.
Trump made it abundantly clear that Americans’ enemies are right here at home:  globalists, neoconservatives and other unilateralists accustomed to imposing the US on the world and involving us in endless and expensive wars, politicians who serve the Ruling Establishment rather than the American people, indeed, the entire canopy of private interests that have run America into the ground while getting rich in the process.
If truth can be said, President Trump has declared a war far more dangerous to himself than if he had declared war against Russia or China.
The interest groups designated by Trump as The Enemy are well entrenched and accustomed to being in charge. Their powerful networks are still in place.  Although there are Republican majorities in the House and Senate, most of those in Congress are answerable to the ruling interest groups that provide their campaign funds and not to the American people or to the President. The military/security complex, offshoring corporations, Wall Street and the banks are not going to roll over for Trump. And neither is the presstitute media, which is owned by the interest groups whose power Trump challenges.
Trump made it clear that he stands for every American, black, brown, and white.  Little doubt his declaration of inclusiveness will be ignored by the haters on the left who will continue to call him a racist just as the $50 per hour paid protesters are doing as I write.
Indeed, black leadership, for example, is enculturated into the victimization role from which it would be hard for them to escape. How do you pull together people who all their lives have been taught that whites are racists and that they are the victims of racists?
Can it be done?  I was just on a program briefly with Press TV in which we were supposed to provide analysis of Trump’s inaugural speech.  The other commentator was a black American in Washington, DC. Trump’s inclusiveness speech made no impression on him, and the show host was only interested in showing the hired protesters as a way of discrediting America. So many people have an economic interest in speaking in behalf of victims that inclusiveness puts them out of jobs and causes. 
So along with the globalists, the CIA, the offshoring corporations, the armaments industries, the NATO establishment in Europe, and foreign politicians accustomed to being well paid for supporting Washington’s interventionist foreign policy, Trump will have arrayed against him the leaders of the victimized peoples, the blacks, the hispanics, the feminists, the illegals, the homosexuals and transgendered.  This long list, of course, includes the white liberals as well, as they are convinced that flyover America is the habitat of white racists, misogynists, homophobes, and gun nuts.  As far as they are concerned, this 84% of geographical US should be quarantined or interred.
In other words, does enough good will remain in the population to enable a President to unite the 16% America haters with the 84% America lovers?  http://brilliantmaps.com/2016-county-election-map/ 
Consider the forces that Trump has against him:
Black and hispanic leaders need victimization, because it is what elevates them to power and income. They will turn a jaundiced eye toward Trump’s inclusiveness. Inclusiveness is good for blacks and hispanics, but not for their leaders.
The executives and shareholders of global corporations are enriched by the offshored jobs that Trump says he will bring home. If the jobs come home, their profits, performance bonuses, and capital gains will go away. But the economic security of the American population will return.
The military/security complex has a 1,000 billion annual budget dependent on “the Russian threat” that Trump says he is going to replace with normalized relations. Trump’s assassination cannot be ruled out.
Many Europeans owe their prestige, power, and incomes to the NATO that Trump has called into question.
The financial sector’s profits almost entirely flow from putting Americans into debt bondage and from looting their private and public pensions. The financial sector with their agent, the Federal Reserve, can overwhelm Trump with financial crisis. The New York Federal Reserve Bank has a complete trading desk. It can send any market into turmoil. Or support any market, because there is no limit on its ability to create US dollars.
The entire political ediface in the US has insulated itself from the will, desires, and needs of the people.  Now Trump says the politicians will be accountable to the people.  This, of course, would mean a big drop in their security in office and in their income and wealth.
There are a large number of groups, funded by we-know-not-who.  For example, RootsAction has responded today to Trump’s forceful commitment to stand for all of the people against the Ruling Establishment with a request to “ask Congress to direct the House Judiciary Committee to open an impeachment investigation” and to send money for Trump’s impeachment.
Another hate group, human rights first, attacks Trump’s defense of our borders as closing “a refuge of hope for those fleeing persecution.”  Think about this for a minute. According to the liberal-progressive-left and the racial interest group organizations, the US is a racist society and President Trump is a racist. Yet, people subject to American racism are fleeing from persecution to America where they will be racially persecuted?  It doesn’t make sense.  The illegals come here for work. Ask the construction companies. Ask the chicken and animal slaughter houses. Ask the vacation area cleaning services.
This list of those on whom Trump has declared war is long enough, although there are more that can be added.
We should ask ourselves why a 70 year old billionaire with flourishing businesses, a beautiful wife, and intelligent children is willing to give his final years to the extraordinary stress of being President with the stressful agenda of putting the government back in the hands of the American people.  There is no doubt that Trump has made himself a target of assassination.  The CIA is not going to give up and go away. Why would a person take on the grand restoration of America that Trump has declared when he could instead spend his remaining years enjoying himself immensely? 
Whatever the reason, we should be grateful for it, and if he is sincere we must support him.  If he is assassinated, we need to take up our weapons, burn Langley to the ground and kill every one of them.
If he succeeds, he deserves the designation: Trump the Great!
Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, and any other country on the CIA’s hit list should undersand that Trump’s rise is insufficient protection. The CIA is a worldwide organization. Its profitable businesses provide income independent of the US budget.  The organization is capable of undertaking operations independently of the President or even of its own Director.
The CIA has had about 70 years to entrench itself.  It has not gone away.
Нажмите здесь, чтобы Ответить или Переслать

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

NON-STATE WARFARE IN BATTLEFIELD OPERATIONS

NON-STATE WARFARE IN BATTLEFIELD OPERATIONS




10.01.2017
I.
In contemporary dialogue or debates on the Russian Art of Modern Warfare, there is the fashionable use of “Hybrid War” or “Hybrid Threat” to define such friction of engagements on the battlefield. Therefore, I have created a term which I call Non-State Warfare which I feel is more appropriate to such a war state condition. This definition which I wish to employ when discussing contemporary engagements between Russia and her political advisories. the United States and its ally, NATO nations is due to the essential fact that in such a war or wars, there is no admittance of contained or small warfare that has a hidden political and social strategic goal to be achieved by another means, in this case “NON-STATE WARFARE”. It can be argued that such a war as NON-STATE WARFARE is a prerequisite kind of guerrilla urban warfare which is the first initial stage to the eventual confrontation in symmetrical warfare, or what is commonly known as conventional, modern warfare. The political struggle between nation-states like that of the class struggle inevitably is one of violent friction that is war, with all the variants of war that have been a part of human history. As Lenin wrote so judicially and without the language of false illusions about war “We Marxists differ from both the pacifists and the Anarchists in that we deem it necessary historically (from the standpoint of Marx’s dialectical materialism) to study each war separately. In history there have been numerous wars which, in spite of all the horrors, atrocities, distress and suffering that inevitably accompany alt wars, were progressive, i.e., benefited the development of mankind by helping to destroy the exceptionally harmful and reactionary institutions… Therefore, it is necessary to examine the historically specific features of precisely the present war”. i With this quote about war and its modern day development in mind, I would like to discuss or make some commentary on Captain John Chambers’ essay “An Analysis of Russia’s ‘New Generation Warfare’ and Implications for the US Army, which can be found in MODERN WAR INSTITUTE At West Point, published in October 18, 2016.
There is a curious complex among Western military science academics, particularly American military analysis about so-called “Open –Warfare Threats” verses a type of engagement called “Gray-Zone Hybrid Threats”.
As perceived in the essay by Captain John Chambers’ “The Army must adequately define Hybrid threats and the gray zone in order to achieve shared understanding amongst strategists, leaders, and policy makers. When doing this, the Army should consider that the gray zone is not as specific type of conflict but an operational environment as defined in Joint Publication (JP) 1-02, Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. Finally, the Army must recognize that there is a distinct difference between hybrid threats in the gray zone and open-warfare hybrid threats… Criminal Organizations and Networks and (5) Using Laws and Cultural Norms as a Weapons System. Open warfare hybrid threats are what are commonly thought of today as hybrid tactics/warfare”.ii

Thursday, January 5, 2017

Bobana M. Andjelkovic -- LUMPEN-PROLETERIAT, SO-CALLED 'ELITE' FACEBOOK


LUMPEN-PROLETERIAT, SO-CALLED 'ELITE'Facebook

VKbloggerLiveJournalTwitterGoogle+EmailPrintPartilhar























05.01.2017
As countdown for the Obama's administration in White House started, it is obvious that the beasts are unleashed and the Atlantists' destroying machinery has no intention to stop. Various branches of unleashed mercenaries and sickos are globe-trotting, hoping to save all the problems, create new and wait for the orders from sicken bosses to cause some more atrocities. 
And, that is why Obama got Nobel Prize for Peace in advance. That he can bomb in peace and for peace. Although, there was peace in Syria when Obama decided that Syria needs peace. Once a warmonger got some prestigious prize, it is written on his forehead that he is winner of the prize and he can continue warmongering. Maybe some people sometimes got it for peace, really. But, even Nobel was not some peaceful guy, he engineered some of the tools of warfare. So, everything comes to its place – the prize finally started to go to right hands or, Nobel Prize Committee uncovered finally its real nature. Every normal person should reject this, literary, bloody prize. It became especially disgusting, since the Nobel Prize for Literature for this year is given to Robert Zimmerman, a.k.a. Bob Dylan, one of the main CIA musicians from '60s to today, recruited for all the wrongdoings connected to promotion of narcotics, riots, pacifying anti-establishment movements, anti-war movements or any kind of social 'alternative' which was against prescribed state policy, but not prescribed by the state.
At the end of the day, Obama's administration is just an executive group of Atlantist's military-industrial complex and its role was nothing else but to maintain wars, clashes, terrorist attacks, assassinations, 'civil wars' and economic exhausting of countries and states in order to maintain power.

Friday, November 25, 2016

Andrew Korybko -- FRANCE, GERMANY, RUSSIA AND MULTIPOLARITY

The first part of the study established the methodological criteria which researchers can attempt to use in scientifically assessing whether a country is unipolar or multipolar at any given moment in time. This section of the work contains a cursory example of this process in practice, but it must be prefaced by explicitly stating that it is by no means comprehensive and has been done according to the author’s understanding of each of these states and their examined variables. It simply wasn’t possible to carry out the proposed research in the specific manner that was earlier described due to obvious time and personnel constraints, though the author holds to his below-mentioned conclusions and believes that they remain consistent to his prior writings on each of the studied states. Furthermore, despite the relative subjectivity (or more accurately, self-described unscientific approach) of the categorization, it’s intended to be used as an introduction to the topic of differentiating states into unipolar, multipolar, and contested camps and relatedly provoke a much-needed discussion about the latter. 
Methodological Review
To refresh the reader’s memory, the author will look at the following characteristics for each examined state before making the final determination about whether it’s unipolar, multipolar, or contested:
Media/Economic/Institutional/Grassroots/Geopolitical/Political System/Elite/Military 
The following countries are included in the review:
France/Germany/Russia/Turkey/Iran/India/Indonesia/China/Japan
In classifying each of the selected states, relevant historical and present circumstances will be included in order to add the appropriate situational context when needed. 
France
Media:
French media such as France24 are decidedly unipolar, although there’s a growing rank of alternative media outlets that are challenging this narrative, such as the ones that are supportive of Le Pen’s National Front. 
Economic:
As taken from the Observatory of Economic Complexity, (which will be used as the primary source for this category going forward), France’s trade partners are overwhelming within the EU, although China has risen to being the top third import partner at $53.2 billion. 
Institutional:
Having shed its Gaullist roots of cautionary distance, France is now a leading member in NATO, the most important of its institutional determinants to the study. It’s also one of the main countries in the EU, which is presently American-controlled and on the verge of becoming a complete satellite if TTIP is agreed to. 

NATO — PRIVATE CLUB OF WAR CRIMINALS

Writer, independent thinker

What has happened is that NATO provides cover for these transgressions of the United States government’s policy. In other words, it absolutely legitimizes what effectively is NATO aggression. Moreover, what one needs to bear in mind and what one needs to be mindful about is the fact that in Western Europe you no longer have rulers with the independence of Charles de Gaulle.
It seems that Washington, and we can use Washington, America and NATO interchangeably because NATO is dominated by the United States. It is a command structure, which ultimately is based on American military power and American military precedence.  Everybody else is effectively a vassal. Or, if the word vassal is too hard, they are certainly juniors in rank to what the Americans do.
America has used NATO and it has used the European Union as the means, in which it can have these designs implemented. By designs, I mean the overthrow of Gaddafi in Libya, the attempt to overthrow Assad in Syria. These are actually illegal. Russia and China were duped when they came to the UN position on Libya. Effectively, now we can see what it was.
It was right from the beginning a deceptive arrangement, based on overthrowing Gaddafi. On these occasions, they have been wholeheartedly supported by European leaders. During that campaign, Italian bases were used to bomb Libya and British Special Forces participated in training these Islamist rebels, who were eventually successful in overthrowing Gaddafi. French planes also were very instrumental in the bombing of Libya, the actual tracking down of Muammar Gaddafi and his lynching.
These are effectively war crimes. There are no two ways about it. Waging an aggressive war and assassinating foreign leaders. Therefore, this lack of spine in the European leadership is particularly regretful in the sense that the Americans are forcing them to do things against their interests.
We saw this after the coup in Kiev, which was sponsored by American intelligence, with the illegal overthrow of the legitimate government of Viktor Yanukovych. That was a situation in which the EU was complicit. In doing that, they have been forced by the United States to impose sanctions against Russia, which are against their economic interests.
So, absolutely, I would agree with that interpretation that NATO and the European Union don’t want Britain to break away from the EU. They have used that sufficient cover to give the validation of legality to what are illegal actions on the part of the United States and NATO.

MOSCOW ESTABLISHES A MULTIPOLAR MILITARY BLOC

MOSCOW ESTABLISHES A MULTIPOLAR MILITARY BLOC


Moscow, April 27-28, 2016
The Fifth International Conference on International Security has opened in Moscow. The annual forum is hosted by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. The main topics on the agenda are the fight against terrorism, security in the Asia-Pacific region, the security of Central Asia, and the fight against color revolutions.
Hide
The main objective of the conference is to offer an alternative to Western views on key issues of international security and world stability. Events of this kind are tools for the formation of a multipolar agenda which involves other centers of power besides just the West. The forum itself does not involve any Western countries’ defense ministers, who traditionally avoid the conference. There are, on the other hand, high-ranking delegates from Iran (including the defense minister) and China. The top Russian speakers include the ministers of foreign affairs and defense, who declared that they are worried by NATO’s anti-Russian actions and plan to respond adequately.
Hide
The forums’ participants openly denounce the interventionist policy of the West and the imposition of Western liberal values on the rest of humanity. The head of the Russian General Staff, Army General Valery Gerasimov, in particular emphasized: "Attempts to transfer the values of Western democracy onto countries with their own mentalities, moral values and traditions leads to the opposite result. The artificial planting of alien ideals led to the explosion of North Africa and the Middle East. "

assange



At midday on Friday 5 February, 2016 Julian Assange, John Jones QC, Melinda Taylor, Jennifer Robinson and Baltasar Garzon will be speaking at a press conference at the Frontline Club on the decision made by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on the Assange case.

xmas





the way we live

MAN


THE ENTIRE 14:02' INTERVIEW IS AVAILABLE AT

RC



info@exopoliticsportugal.com

BJ 2 FEV


http://benjaminfulfordtranslations.blogspot.pt/


UPDATES ON THURSDAY MORNINGS

AT 08:00h UTC


By choosing to educate ourselves and to spread the word, we can and will build a brighter future.

bj


Report 26:01:2015

BRAZILIAN

CHINESE

CROATIAN

CZECK

ENGLISH

FRENCH

GREEK

GERMAN

ITALIAN

JAPANESE

PORTUGUESE

SPANISH

UPDATES ON THURSDAY MORNINGS

AT 08:00 H GMT


BENJAMIN FULFORD -- jan 19





UPDATES ON THURSDAY MORNINGS

AT 08:00 H GMT

PressTV News Videos